<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:rawvoice="http://www.rawvoice.com/rawvoiceRssModule/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Sharon Stone Treatment</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tammybruce.com/2006/04/the_sharon_stone_treatment.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tammybruce.com/2006/04/the_sharon_stone_treatment.html</link>
	<description>Independent. Conservative. Unruly.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 20:20:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Artist for truth</title>
		<link>http://tammybruce.com/2006/04/the_sharon_stone_treatment.html#comment-109129</link>
		<dc:creator>Artist for truth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Apr 2006 01:02:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tammybruce.com/2006/04/the-sharon-stone-treatment.php#comment-109129</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;CraigC,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;No . . . sorry to say . . . have a mind of my own&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>CraigC,</p>
<p>No . . . sorry to say . . . have a mind of my own</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CraigC</title>
		<link>http://tammybruce.com/2006/04/the_sharon_stone_treatment.html#comment-109128</link>
		<dc:creator>CraigC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Apr 2006 03:42:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tammybruce.com/2006/04/the-sharon-stone-treatment.php#comment-109128</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I haven&#039;t really looked all that hard at any pictures of Sharon Stone lately, but I&#039;d be very disappointed if she&#039;s had work done. She is one the great natural beauties of all time. She doesn&#039;t need it.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Artist For Truth, please tell me you were being ironic in quoting de Beauvoir.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I haven&#8217;t really looked all that hard at any pictures of Sharon Stone lately, but I&#8217;d be very disappointed if she&#8217;s had work done. She is one the great natural beauties of all time. She doesn&#8217;t need it.</p>
<p>Artist For Truth, please tell me you were being ironic in quoting de Beauvoir.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Artist for truth</title>
		<link>http://tammybruce.com/2006/04/the_sharon_stone_treatment.html#comment-109127</link>
		<dc:creator>Artist for truth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Apr 2006 22:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tammybruce.com/2006/04/the-sharon-stone-treatment.php#comment-109127</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Let&#039;s consider the source of who thinks who is worthy and why:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&quot;Representation of the world, like the world itself, is the work of men; they describe it from their own point of view, which they confuse with the absolute truth.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Simone de Beauvoir&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let&#8217;s consider the source of who thinks who is worthy and why:</p>
<p>&#8220;Representation of the world, like the world itself, is the work of men; they describe it from their own point of view, which they confuse with the absolute truth.&#8221;</p>
<p>Simone de Beauvoir</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gkboy</title>
		<link>http://tammybruce.com/2006/04/the_sharon_stone_treatment.html#comment-109126</link>
		<dc:creator>gkboy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Apr 2006 20:43:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tammybruce.com/2006/04/the-sharon-stone-treatment.php#comment-109126</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;What your saying is true about the treatment of men vs women in hollywood, but comparing a 48 yo woman to a 64 yo man and a 76 yo man isn&#039;t quite fair. Lets see Connery and Ford at 48. Most women would have fallen into their arms hearts a flutter. I don&#039;t care for stone&#039;s movies, but she is hot, and yes women can do that without surgery. Genetics help and taking care of yourself. My mother is still mistaken as my wife when we are out, and she is 52 and I am 32. My dad never gets mistaken as brother though, I don&#039;t get it.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What your saying is true about the treatment of men vs women in hollywood, but comparing a 48 yo woman to a 64 yo man and a 76 yo man isn&#8217;t quite fair. Lets see Connery and Ford at 48. Most women would have fallen into their arms hearts a flutter. I don&#8217;t care for stone&#8217;s movies, but she is hot, and yes women can do that without surgery. Genetics help and taking care of yourself. My mother is still mistaken as my wife when we are out, and she is 52 and I am 32. My dad never gets mistaken as brother though, I don&#8217;t get it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tink</title>
		<link>http://tammybruce.com/2006/04/the_sharon_stone_treatment.html#comment-109125</link>
		<dc:creator>Tink</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Apr 2006 18:31:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tammybruce.com/2006/04/the-sharon-stone-treatment.php#comment-109125</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Peter, I agree with you about Stone, and prefer women with some life on their face.  My comment was about the Hollywood age thing in general which still holds true.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I saw Her High-and-Shininess on Leno and Letterman and something just wasn&#039;t right.  Besides her perfect glossy look, she just sat there and giggled constantly...throwing about sexy glances.... and barely speaking 2 or 3 complete sentences in either interview. I thought maybe she was trying to be in character or something weird like that. Maybe she knew her girlfriend Hillary would be watching.  :o)!!!&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Peter, I agree with you about Stone, and prefer women with some life on their face.  My comment was about the Hollywood age thing in general which still holds true.</p>
<p>I saw Her High-and-Shininess on Leno and Letterman and something just wasn&#8217;t right.  Besides her perfect glossy look, she just sat there and giggled constantly&#8230;throwing about sexy glances&#8230;. and barely speaking 2 or 3 complete sentences in either interview. I thought maybe she was trying to be in character or something weird like that. Maybe she knew her girlfriend Hillary would be watching.  :o)!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PeteRFNY</title>
		<link>http://tammybruce.com/2006/04/the_sharon_stone_treatment.html#comment-109124</link>
		<dc:creator>PeteRFNY</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Apr 2006 18:04:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tammybruce.com/2006/04/the-sharon-stone-treatment.php#comment-109124</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Not to play Devil&#039;s Advocate...but if I had any complaint about Ms. Stone, it&#039;s that she looks a little bit to plasticine for my liking. Either she&#039;s had a cheek lift or a face pull or SOMETHING (look at those eyebrows...yikes!)- then had it buffed off with a fine coating of Madame Tussaud&#039;s finest wax.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I prefer women that age gracefully, naturally - without the need to keep trying to LOOK like they are 30. That&#039;s far hotter than any oddly-shiny topcoat can ever be.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Ford and Connery are geezers - but at least they are OK with that. Not that Sharon Stone ISN&#039;T...but something there just don&#039;t look quite right, know whut I mean?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;-P-&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not to play Devil&#8217;s Advocate&#8230;but if I had any complaint about Ms. Stone, it&#8217;s that she looks a little bit to plasticine for my liking. Either she&#8217;s had a cheek lift or a face pull or SOMETHING (look at those eyebrows&#8230;yikes!)- then had it buffed off with a fine coating of Madame Tussaud&#8217;s finest wax.</p>
<p>I prefer women that age gracefully, naturally &#8211; without the need to keep trying to LOOK like they are 30. That&#8217;s far hotter than any oddly-shiny topcoat can ever be.</p>
<p>Ford and Connery are geezers &#8211; but at least they are OK with that. Not that Sharon Stone ISN&#8217;T&#8230;but something there just don&#8217;t look quite right, know whut I mean?</p>
<p>-P-</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tink</title>
		<link>http://tammybruce.com/2006/04/the_sharon_stone_treatment.html#comment-109123</link>
		<dc:creator>Tink</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Apr 2006 15:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tammybruce.com/2006/04/the-sharon-stone-treatment.php#comment-109123</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Tammy&#039;s right about the way mature women and old geezers are treated differently. I think it&#039;s really bizarre that it seems to only be getting worse.  Great actresses of the 30s and 40s kept working well into their more mature years, on par I think with the men.   But the great actresses of today are shelved after a few good years. What happened to all those good liberal progressives on the Left Coast?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;And there is an entire market that Hollywood ignores by sticking to what it obviously thinks is a formula. It&#039;s young man/young woman or old man/young woman.  The exception is a middle aged man/middle aged woman... like &quot;Broken Flowers&quot; or one of my favs &quot;Open Range&quot; with Costner and Annette Bening. Those were actually refreshing to watch because they didn&#039;t follow the age formula.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Harrison Ford, Connery, and the &quot;Indiana Jones and the Nursing Home of Doom&quot; will tank. I&#039;m so over them.  He&#039;s not just old.... he&#039;s tired. And that earring of his is laughable... come on Harrison, act your age.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tammy&#8217;s right about the way mature women and old geezers are treated differently. I think it&#8217;s really bizarre that it seems to only be getting worse.  Great actresses of the 30s and 40s kept working well into their more mature years, on par I think with the men.   But the great actresses of today are shelved after a few good years. What happened to all those good liberal progressives on the Left Coast?</p>
<p>And there is an entire market that Hollywood ignores by sticking to what it obviously thinks is a formula. It&#8217;s young man/young woman or old man/young woman.  The exception is a middle aged man/middle aged woman&#8230; like &#8220;Broken Flowers&#8221; or one of my favs &#8220;Open Range&#8221; with Costner and Annette Bening. Those were actually refreshing to watch because they didn&#8217;t follow the age formula.</p>
<p>Harrison Ford, Connery, and the &#8220;Indiana Jones and the Nursing Home of Doom&#8221; will tank. I&#8217;m so over them.  He&#8217;s not just old&#8230;. he&#8217;s tired. And that earring of his is laughable&#8230; come on Harrison, act your age.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave J</title>
		<link>http://tammybruce.com/2006/04/the_sharon_stone_treatment.html#comment-109122</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave J</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Apr 2006 15:24:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tammybruce.com/2006/04/the-sharon-stone-treatment.php#comment-109122</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Mmmmm...Sharon Stone.  Err...[collapses in highly uncharacteristic slack-jawed speechlessness] ;-)&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mmmmm&#8230;Sharon Stone.  Err&#8230;[collapses in highly uncharacteristic slack-jawed speechlessness] ;-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chase</title>
		<link>http://tammybruce.com/2006/04/the_sharon_stone_treatment.html#comment-109121</link>
		<dc:creator>chase</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Apr 2006 14:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tammybruce.com/2006/04/the-sharon-stone-treatment.php#comment-109121</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Of course Sharon Stone is hot, sheâ€™s our generation!  But I think Iâ€™ll skip BI:3, where she crosses her legs in a wheelchair.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Of course Sharon Stone is hot, sheâ€™s our generation!  But I think Iâ€™ll skip BI:3, where she crosses her legs in a wheelchair.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve in Ohio</title>
		<link>http://tammybruce.com/2006/04/the_sharon_stone_treatment.html#comment-109120</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve in Ohio</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Apr 2006 13:36:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tammybruce.com/2006/04/the-sharon-stone-treatment.php#comment-109120</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Tammy, I think the difference between Sharon and Harrison/Sean is that the boys aren&#039;t appearing in a movie designed to exploit their looks (no nudity as far as I know or hope. Blechhh!!!) Their appeal is to forty-something hairy-back guys like myself who like to think that we can still do heroics (you know, true fantasy.) And while I&#039;m not naive enough to believe that Harrison/Sean haven&#039;t had any plastic surgery, they haven&#039;t gone nearly as far as Sharon has. I haven&#039;t seen the movie, but did Sharon&#039;s plastic surgeons (and I&#039;m sure she has a staff) get credits?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;You want a sexy older woman actress? Sela Ward. Rrrroooowwwrrrrr. &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.fox.com/house/bios/sela.htm&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.fox.com/house/bios/sela.htm&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Sela&#039;s not afraid of a few wrinkles. Sharon&#039;s beauty seems too artificial to me, too store bought. That may be unfair I know, but if she managed to look like that at her age without a scalpel, she&#039;s about the only woman on the planet who has.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tammy, I think the difference between Sharon and Harrison/Sean is that the boys aren&#8217;t appearing in a movie designed to exploit their looks (no nudity as far as I know or hope. Blechhh!!!) Their appeal is to forty-something hairy-back guys like myself who like to think that we can still do heroics (you know, true fantasy.) And while I&#8217;m not naive enough to believe that Harrison/Sean haven&#8217;t had any plastic surgery, they haven&#8217;t gone nearly as far as Sharon has. I haven&#8217;t seen the movie, but did Sharon&#8217;s plastic surgeons (and I&#8217;m sure she has a staff) get credits?</p>
<p>You want a sexy older woman actress? Sela Ward. Rrrroooowwwrrrrr. <a href="http://www.fox.com/house/bios/sela.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.fox.com/house/bios/sela.htm</a><br />
Sela&#8217;s not afraid of a few wrinkles. Sharon&#8217;s beauty seems too artificial to me, too store bought. That may be unfair I know, but if she managed to look like that at her age without a scalpel, she&#8217;s about the only woman on the planet who has.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

