I have lots to say about the arrest of that freak in Thailand, a big part of which is my skepticism at his involvement in the killing of JonBenet. Yes, he seems like a freak, and yes it’s probably good he’s been arrested, but from all I’ve seen this guy seems more like a MalNar crime groupie who has inserted himself into the situation.
I’m doing Tammy Radio right now and I’ll expand on all of this shortly, but I wanted to give you all a thread for your comments on this as it, well, unravels.
Have at it.
UPDATE:
Legal analyst: break in Ramsey case could be hoax
Ya think?
And more people are beginning to look funny at this entire situation.
ABC: A Break in the JonBenet Ramsey Case: Too Easy?
In some ways, the long-awaited possible big break in the 10-year-old case of the murder of JonBenet Ramsey seemed a little too easy…Laura Karr said to ABC News affiliate KGO-TV in San Francisco that she was with her former husband in Alabama, where they lived at the time of JonBenet’s killing, and that she did not believe he was involved in the slaying.
Karr, she said, was fascinated with the Ramsey investigation long before his arrest and spent a lot of time studying her case, as well as the case of Polly Klaas, the 12-year-old girl who was abducted from her Petaluma, Calif., home and slain in 1993.
Could Karr have falsely confessed to JonBenet’s killing? It’s possible, some experts say. Karr could have had such an obsession with JonBenet that he could have falsely confessed.
And this:
Confession in JonBenet case questioned
Denver attorney Larry Pozner, past president of the National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers, said there were “serious questions” about the case. “I hope we have found the murderer of JonBenet, but I have not heard the evidence that compels that conclusion,” he said.
Karr’s description of the case as an accident also rang false to experts.
“It’s hard to imagine a more intentional, deliberate murder than hitting a little girl in the head so hard that she had almost a foot-long fracture in her skull and then deliberately fashioning a garrote to twist until it buries in her neck and slowly stops her breathing,” said Silverman, the former Denver prosecutor. “This has always been a case of deliberate murder.”
This comment is especially interesting because it points out one of the several oddities in Karr’s confession. Karr says here that her death was due to an accidental overdose of chloroform. Last time I check chloroform doesn’t cause your skull to be bashed in.
And there is still this question: in a home the size of the Ramsey’s this man is expecting us to believe he, as a stranger, broke into a house on Christmas Eve, walked upstairs and managed to find JonBenet, woke her causing no noise, chloroformed her? then carried her downstairs back to the basement to rape her while still inside the occupied house. He then “accidentally” kills her, and instead of fleeing, writes a ransom note in the house, and then leaves? Why?
Or, let’s say he writes the ransom note before going upstairs. We know the note was written on paper from inside the home. But if you’re planning a ransom kidnapping, why not bring the demand with you? Why extend your time in the house, exposing yourself to capture? None of this makes sense, making me more and more convinced this is what we’ve got here.
{ 7 comments… read them below or add one }
I don’t think this is a bogus confession, just from what I’ve heard thus far.
He says he “loved her†and that “There’s no way [he] could be brief about it. It’s a very involved series of events”.
Unfortunately this sounds just like a sicko pedophile mentality. And consider where he was picked up.
The only thing ‘very involved’ is my desire to see our justice system in optimal effect in this case. I’m curious if this guy had any history that would have foreshadowed this event.
My take on him is similar to Tammy’s, I suppose.
We have a sick individual, obsessed with child murders, who collected all the information he could about a famous case, and even corresponded at length with people around the case.
Then we see him captured for doing sick things to children in Thailand (or more likely, for not paying the right people off, who would have been happy to allow him to do sick things to children, for the right price).
Where do you think this monster would rather serve his time, in a Thai dungeon, or a US prison?
So, the manipulative malignant narcissist he is, he uses the knowledge he gleaned about the JonBenet case and concocted a story that would get him a ticket back to the United States, the ego stroke of media attention, and most likely a deal where he doesn’t face the death penalty.
Plus his ex-wife is saying that she can definitively prove that he wasn’t in Colorado at the time of the slaying.
Frankly, I think he should have stayed to rot in Thailand, and the FBI may have been duped.
Assuming he killed her as he claims, it is probably
better for the world’s balance of good and evil that he rot in a Thai dungeon. But, even if he deals out of the death penalty from the Colorado, he will have to watch his back very carefully around other prisoners, since their favorite targets are child molesters. And he might not be around as long to consider his crime in US prison as he would be in a Thai prison.
Hmmm, the more I hear, the more I think it may be a hoax.
That’s funny, one of the segments on the Oreilly Factor was how the media is getting info to the public before all the facts are in order. I had the guy guilty (based on his confession mind you) before I heard that his story conflicted with the coroner’s report.
I think Dr. Cyril Wecht’s analysis is is correct.
Whoever murdered JonBonet was not a stranger to the family. They knew the layout of the house.
Even if John and Patsy Ramsey are innocent, they made themselves look suspicious because of the way they acted.
My guess is that the murderor was an aquaintance of the Ramsey’s who had visited the home many times. I think that the Ramsey’s know a lot more than they have said.
The police should be able to corroborate this nutcakes’s “confession” in short order. If he did do this awful crime a terrible monster will have been taken off the streets. If he didn’t do it, he will have gotten his 15 minutes of fame and he will forever be known as the nuttiest nutjob in the universe.
2 things bug me about this. 1. did anyone else find it creepy how he was paraded out in front of reporters, lee harvey oswald-style? why were all those guys touching him and wanting their pictures taken with him? the guy is creepy-looking enough.
the other thing is that the media-locusts and talking-heads are out and on this like flies on meat. now it looks like the 24/7 cable-nets will be nothing but Jon-Benet for the next 9 months again. cable news really is a society-killer. i really do hate fox/cnn/cnbc/msnbc and their yelling bubble-heads
You must log in to post a comment.