Hillary Formally Announces Bid for Presidency

by Tammy on January 20, 2007 · 12 comments

The arrogance of these people never ceases to amaze me. After their bumbling, self-obsessive control of the White House for 8 years brought us Monica Lewinsky and September 11th, Hillary thinks she’s worthy of getting it in her paws again. This is like your son totaling your car after driving under the influence and killing 3 pedestrians in the process, and he has the gall to ask for the keys the very next week.

She does this, of course, because she knows her constituency doesn’t care (or believes we deserved September 11th), and you, the “other side,” is just bunch of retards who can be manipulated and controlled.

With how this is being received in the press, one of my questions is, How can you have two Messiahs?

Analysis: Clinton enters historic race
[Analysis? Hahahahahah! None of the coverage, let alone this AP piece, is 'analysis.' It's one big orgiastic cluster f***.--ed.]

Hillary Rodham Clinton enters the race for the 2008 Democratic presidential nomination with unrivaled political strengths and challenges to match, a former first lady turned senator, soon to be tested in a campaign unlike any other in American history.

While Clinton seeks to become the first woman commander in chief, Illinois Sen. Barack Obama is in the early stages of what promises to be the most credible White House campaign ever by a black politician. [Hahahahaha! he hasn't even done anything yet!!--ed.]

Share and Enjoy:
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Digg

{ 12 comments… read them below or add one }

1 Rod January 20, 2007 at 12:25 pm

I said 2 years ago this was her goal. Why else would she strongly support the War on Terror by backing the Minute Men and their stand on building a real fence? In so doing she set herself apart from GW Bush, G Soros, the ACLU, Move on.org the Kos Klan and many other leftists. She made it easier to wint the Nov election but much harder to get the nomination. The dems general side with Soros, the ACLU et. al. But as Lieberman showed a Dem can win the November election without formally being on their ticket.

To do better in the primaries she has modified her support of the Minutemen and has supported Krauthamer’s call for a “4th” choice. Something other than the wee micro surge Bush has put out. This may help her do better in the primaries. ‘by backing Krauthamer she can be against Bush while still being a “hawk”.

The next 1.8 years are going to be interesting!

2 Kimj7157 January 20, 2007 at 1:13 pm

From Judith Hope, Democratic Party Chairwoman:
“I think it’s an exciting moment in history for New York women, for American women and, in fact, for women around the world,” added Hope, who heads “Eleanor’s Legacy,” a New York-based political action committee named for former first lady Eleanor Roosevelt and dedicated to advancing the political careers of women candidates.”

It would be exciting if the woman wasn’t Hillary. You know, instead, maybe someone with vision, character and integrity. Someone who would truly do what is in this country’s best interest instead of their own. THAT AIN’T HILLARY, and never will be.

In dealing with the “Bill” baggage, this Hope person says “…under Bill Clinton this country was prosperous and peaceful and Americans were doing very well… .” Oh terrific. Back to “head in the sand” mode. Super. Just what we need.

3 SteveOk January 20, 2007 at 1:59 pm

The MSM has been laying the ground work for Hillary ever since 9/11 doing everything it can to blame the Bush Administration for 9/11 and refusing to give him credit for no attacks on our homeland since 9/11. They never mention that Bush was only in office for 9 months before 9/11 and during the 8 years of Slick Willey we were attacked time after time by Al Qaeda and he did almost nothing. The other thing that really bothers me about Hillary is that she is a liar. When the revelations came out about Monica and Slick she blamed it all on the “vast right wing conspiracy” when in fact she knew full well that Slick had played the field for decades on her and SHE DID NOTHING. Her health care plan was a disaster, and her moving target Iraq policy is calibrated to win the Primaries. How could America vote for a woman for President who allowed her husband to stomp all over her face for decades? I feel sorry for her but I don’t want her to lead the free world when she doesn’t have the courage to stand up to that. How could she ever stand up to Iran or N. Korea? My God deliver us from that doomsday senario.

4 pat_s January 20, 2007 at 2:47 pm

Why should women get so excited about this? Margaret Chase Smith was the first woman to be placed in nomination for the presidency at a major party convention 1964.

5 JuddyB January 20, 2007 at 4:23 pm

It is a great day in history! Finally we have a woman and a genius husband to fix our country!

She plays by the rules, has good intentions, and is not a stubborn, arrogant, and out of touch like our current administration and especially the current President and his close staff!

1. Hey SteveO, Who’s Margaret Smith, she had no chance! Hilary has the budget and the brains!

2. Yo KimJ, So we haven’t been hit big deal! what about before 9/11 we were never hit so how can you compare? They dropped the ball and we got hit, face it they are not organized! It’s pure chaos with their crew of cronies like Brownie and Snowjobby…

3. Listen Rod! Next 1.8 years are gonna be horrilble! I hope we just don’t start anything with the Rigs in Iran… Ahmadinajead is powerless ! He’s a puppet and the real power is the 12 Imams there! So it’s doesn’t matter what he says, just ignore him… Ahmadinejad can’t make laws, declare war, he can’t do anything worth our attention! Let’s get the focus back on Osama Bin Laden and Afghanistan and the Taliban. Then let’s work our way into Africa and end some of the true suffering! No more war for Oil, it’s not worth the blood of our soldiers!

Thanks for the forum Tammy! Your show Rocks !

6 Lib85 January 20, 2007 at 5:16 pm

The MSM does not hold the public in high regard. They think that the public will overlook the 8 years of degenerate behavior in the White House under Clinton. The MSM might be right about this. Clinton had high approval ratings because of the perception of peace and prosperity. The fact that the Muslim problem was growing as a result of his inaction is lost on many. Keep in mind, this is the same MSM that is worried about there being attacks on innocent Muslims in this country because a nuclear bomb was detonated on the fictional TV show “24.” The MSM is VERY condescending toward the general public. But the public has given them a right to be in some ways. There is very little support for the Iraq war because it is hard. Americans do not have the stomach for things that are hard. The MSM knows this. It was easy under Clinton, as long as you didn’t watch the news.

7 Kimj7157 January 21, 2007 at 4:25 am

JuddyB, I wholeheartedly agree(on this point)—Tammy’s show does Rock! And here’s to “agreeing to disagree” and informed, civil debate and perhaps a few changed minds along the way. :)

8 SLABBOTT January 21, 2007 at 5:01 am

Get ready conservatives! We have no credible alternatives to this shrew and I believe we probably can’t stop her from being elected! Once she is and comes into office with a solid Democratic congress…hang on! We will probably all be sent to a Gulog for “re-education” by the “Village”…

9 Rod January 21, 2007 at 2:12 pm

JuddyB – - No question the left winger in the White House is a liberal liar. But he is still better than JFK. Bush is a very bad President; but I would vote for the liberal liar again over JFK!
It is the long primary fighting that will make the next 1.8 years exciting. Not our timid, cowardly President.

10 YankeeWanker January 22, 2007 at 11:14 am

Will one reporter please ask Mrs. Clinton if her administration would re-employ the Ostrich Doctrine in response to terrorism.

11 pat_s January 22, 2007 at 1:46 pm

My concern is the same as SLABBOT.

The Republicans are in meltdown mode. In the next two years there’s not much hope in Bush recovering respect or credibility. Not much hope Iraq will improve appreciably. A time-limited troop surge confined to a particular zone is the same stupidity as the Cambodian incursion during the Viet Nam war. Could say a lot more about the incompetence of war management. Forget about a border fence. Bush presumably will suggest a tax increase tomorrow night. No candidates with any pizzazz.

The conservative base rebelled in ’06 and the bluebloods seemed glad to be rid of us. The conservatives liability is they are principled. The only hope as I see it at the present is the Dems become overconfident and give us a glimpse of who they really are. The American heart is not with the liberal-socialists.

12 Marie January 23, 2007 at 4:42 pm

Imagine this:

Hillary finally gets the Oval Office…terrorist strike on American soil again…she hasn’t a clue on how to really handle the savages, and looks to Bill for advice…

Frightening isn’t it?!!

Previous post:

Next post: