Tammy Bruce: Anti-HIllary YouTube Video

Anti-HIllary YouTube Video

As we discussed on the show, here's the video making the news--the anti-Hillary/pro-Barak Hussein ad running on YouTube.

Posted by Tammy · March 19, 2007 12:01 PM · Permalink
Internet/Communication | Politics

Comments

The ad is great. Orwell was great! But - you Tube has a small part of the market. Much less than the MSM/DNC. Billary wins. Few will see this.

Watch that TV over your bed - Big Brother's people are watching! Think proper thoughts and do proper things. (don't ask me what the later is.)

Posted by: Rod at March 19, 2007 12:34 PM

I looked in on this video, and couldn't help thinking that this scene must've brought a smile to Shrillary's lips and a warming to her heart, wishing that it could all be true.

But there won't be any moonbat barking about this video, since it cannot be said that any Republican produced it. Afterall, it's only conservatives who aren't afforded the Freedom of speech by the 1st Amendment. See today's LA Times editorial on Obama, the 'Magic Negro', if you need more proof.

Posted by: localmalcontent at March 19, 2007 01:40 PM

For the record, this isn't patterned after the famous Apple 1984 Macintosh ad; it is the famous Apple 1984 Macintosh ad, cleverly edited. You'll find the original in various YouTube updates; here's one. This was directed by Bladerunner's Ridley Scott, and it aired only once, during the Super Bowl on January 22, 1984.

Posted by: Talkin Horse at March 19, 2007 02:16 PM

As someone who loves 1984 and definitely views Hillary as a confiscatory socialist, I hate to say that I find this ad totally ineffective. In fact, I think it could backfire in Obama’s face. While Obama’s people deny being a part of this, the creator links directly to his website. The ad will be connected to his campaign in the mind of the public (plus the “denial” of his staff was pretty flimsy; it sounded like they were struggling to keep a straight face when they commented on it).

The creator could have used much shriller clips of Hillary. The video they used of one of Hillary’s internet addresses where she spoke very calmly and used vague, but positive language made her almost look sympathetic, especially when the ad ends with a sledge hammer smashing her face.

So that’s twice now (the first time was with David Geffen) that we’ve seen an Obama proxy issuing a pretty nasty attack on Hillary/The Clintons. There hasn’t (yet) been anything comparable from the Clintons directed at Obama. If this pattern holds, it’s just going to make Hillary look like the bigger person, and that’s a tall order.

Posted by: ashleymatt at March 19, 2007 04:47 PM

Localmalcontent:

You underestimate the MSM's world-class lying ability. Of course Republicans will get the blame. This is the same MSM that successfully lied about global warming and who insist the surge is not working despite evidence to the contrary. This is the same MSM that brought us the fake Koran-flushing story, the fake National Guard memos, the fake "no WMDs in Iraq" story, the fake "Jamil Hussien is real - honest" stories, and the elegant fauxtography done by Reuters. This is the same MSM that hides crimes committed by Democrats such as William Jefferson and Harry Ried.

And never underestimate the GOP's ability when it comes to self-infliction of political wounds. Any day now I expect Alberto Gonzales (before he gets the axe) to trot out and say, "Well, we had nothing to do with it but mistakes were made. We are very sorry and we will never do it again."

Posted by: Mwalimu Daudi at March 19, 2007 08:42 PM

I like the ad, especially because it doesn't matter whos' face and voice, Billary or Hussein Obama, is used - the agenda of socialism is the same. My suggestion would be, to our conservatives creating ads for the political season, to use this ad, or type of ad, to get the point across. There is a growing thought that all politicians are the same and it's just a matter of where their bread is buttered; this could be no further from the truth and I think the use of this type of add can accomplish the separation that conservatives need from these libs. Maybe instead of zombies in the add it could be a bunch of men dressed in code pink drag.

Posted by: Todd at March 19, 2007 09:56 PM

Be careful with your comments and your thoughts...the "Village" is watching and once she's elected in '08 the "conversation" with the American people will be over and the implementation of her vision for the rest of your life will begin! Thanks to Mr. Bush, the Republican party will not be able to mount a serious challenge and Mr. Obama will have been adopted by Madonna long ago when this election arrives. For those of you still drinking the Bush koolaide...enjoy!

Posted by: SLABBOTT at March 20, 2007 01:16 AM

I would hire those ad people in a minute. If they were not supporting a candidate who attended a Madrasa, I would take a look.

1984; the year the Democrat party chose a candidate who represented their core values (those of the left elite in the party) over a candidate who lead Ronald Reagan in the polls for 6 months straight (John Glenn). Is Walter Mondale still the record holder for fewest electoral votes to a major party candidate?

Posted by: ahwatukeejohn at March 20, 2007 04:25 AM

"Is Walter Mondale still the record holder for the fewest electoral votes to a major party candidate?"
Yes, at 13. He is also the only major party candidate to be rejected for federal office by all 50 states. He lost his senate bid from Minnesota (the only state that voted for him for President)trying to succeed Paul Wellstone.

Posted by: St. Thor at March 20, 2007 06:20 AM

By Category

By Month

Anti-HIllary YouTube Video

Comments

Post a comment