Comments on: I’m for Romney http://tammybruce.com/2008/02/im_for_romney.html Independent. Conservative. Unruly. Fri, 25 May 2012 23:10:51 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2 By: jerocat http://tammybruce.com/2008/02/im_for_romney.html#comment-97840 jerocat Sun, 03 Feb 2008 17:53:00 +0000 http://tammybruce.com/2008/02/im-for-romney/#comment-97840 <p>Thank you Tammy for your thoughtful words.</p> <p>Regarding your other issues I say, live and let live and, keep the government out of the bedroom and out doctors' offices where both social liberals and social conservatives want government to encroach. My body is my property not the government's. However these are not the major issues of the presidency today. Neither is race or gender.</p> <p>On handling America's vitality and strategic place in the world Mitt Romney emerges as the clear leader. The rest can return to the senate where they may or may not even belong.</p> <p>!!! MITT ROMNEY for president !!!</p> Thank you Tammy for your thoughtful words.

Regarding your other issues I say, live and let live and, keep the government out of the bedroom and out doctors’ offices where both social liberals and social conservatives want government to encroach. My body is my property not the government’s. However these are not the major issues of the presidency today. Neither is race or gender.

On handling America’s vitality and strategic place in the world Mitt Romney emerges as the clear leader. The rest can return to the senate where they may or may not even belong.

!!! MITT ROMNEY for president !!!

]]> By: Home in AK http://tammybruce.com/2008/02/im_for_romney.html#comment-97839 Home in AK Sat, 02 Feb 2008 17:57:00 +0000 http://tammybruce.com/2008/02/im-for-romney/#comment-97839 <p>I suppose you could call me a FredHead for Mitt, since I really wanted Fred to be the nominee. Due to his withdrawal the logical choice is Mitt.</p> <p>Not only is he pro-business and a proven chief of state, he is for border control, strong defense and realizes our own recourses are the best way to start down the road of energy independence.</p> <p>McCain wants to tighten controls and raise taxes on business', open borders and lock up ANWR. Sorry Senator, Mitt will get my vote in the Alaska Caucus on Tuesday.</p> I suppose you could call me a FredHead for Mitt, since I really wanted Fred to be the nominee. Due to his withdrawal the logical choice is Mitt.

Not only is he pro-business and a proven chief of state, he is for border control, strong defense and realizes our own recourses are the best way to start down the road of energy independence.

McCain wants to tighten controls and raise taxes on business’, open borders and lock up ANWR. Sorry Senator, Mitt will get my vote in the Alaska Caucus on Tuesday.

]]> By: WildPointer http://tammybruce.com/2008/02/im_for_romney.html#comment-97838 WildPointer Sat, 02 Feb 2008 12:29:00 +0000 http://tammybruce.com/2008/02/im-for-romney/#comment-97838 <p>I am also for Romney at this point. I will not vote for McCain. I would rather vote for the real democrat over the 'pretend' conservative. But actually I just won't vote for anyone if McCain wins the primary. I will vote for state reps and such but I will leave the president check boxes blank. I cannot vote for McCain who is as conservative as Hillary and as far right as Obama. I will not vote for him. I voted for Perot twice. I understand that is why the democrats won those elections. If the republicans do not want to lose this one too then they better choose Romney in the Primaries. I would have preferred Fred or Hunter, but I will vote for Romney. I will NOT 'hold my nose' and vote for any idiot the New York Times endorses as the republican candidate. If there is any 'nose holding' to be done it will have to be McCain supporters voting for Romney, or nothing. </p> I am also for Romney at this point. I will not vote for McCain. I would rather vote for the real democrat over the ‘pretend’ conservative. But actually I just won’t vote for anyone if McCain wins the primary. I will vote for state reps and such but I will leave the president check boxes blank. I cannot vote for McCain who is as conservative as Hillary and as far right as Obama. I will not vote for him. I voted for Perot twice. I understand that is why the democrats won those elections. If the republicans do not want to lose this one too then they better choose Romney in the Primaries. I would have preferred Fred or Hunter, but I will vote for Romney. I will NOT ‘hold my nose’ and vote for any idiot the New York Times endorses as the republican candidate. If there is any ‘nose holding’ to be done it will have to be McCain supporters voting for Romney, or nothing.

]]> By: Tim Peck http://tammybruce.com/2008/02/im_for_romney.html#comment-97837 Tim Peck Sat, 02 Feb 2008 09:05:00 +0000 http://tammybruce.com/2008/02/im-for-romney/#comment-97837 <p>I guess I'll stick with Ron Paul.</p> I guess I’ll stick with Ron Paul.

]]> By: Hangfire http://tammybruce.com/2008/02/im_for_romney.html#comment-97836 Hangfire Sat, 02 Feb 2008 04:48:00 +0000 http://tammybruce.com/2008/02/im-for-romney/#comment-97836 <p>Very cool, Romney is the best thing going;-)</p> Very cool, Romney is the best thing going;-)

]]> By: LtDan http://tammybruce.com/2008/02/im_for_romney.html#comment-97835 LtDan Sat, 02 Feb 2008 03:52:00 +0000 http://tammybruce.com/2008/02/im-for-romney/#comment-97835 <p>I think the man is brilliant, honest, strong, and has more character than I have seen in a politician since Reagan. One of my favorite Romney quotes, was when a reporter said to him "I represent the people..." to which he instantly (and respectfully) replied "no, I represent the people, [i]you[/i] represent the media, and are supposed to be unbiased."<br /> </p> I think the man is brilliant, honest, strong, and has more character than I have seen in a politician since Reagan. One of my favorite Romney quotes, was when a reporter said to him “I represent the people…” to which he instantly (and respectfully) replied “no, I represent the people, [i]you[/i] represent the media, and are supposed to be unbiased.”

]]> By: dmg333 http://tammybruce.com/2008/02/im_for_romney.html#comment-97834 dmg333 Sat, 02 Feb 2008 03:05:00 +0000 http://tammybruce.com/2008/02/im-for-romney/#comment-97834 <p>Being from Utah, I'm glad I don't have to worry about how people are going to vote here.</p> <p>I still want to slap him upside the head for not deluging the media for the pro amnesty pig McCain really is, which could of changed the FL outcome.</p> Being from Utah, I’m glad I don’t have to worry about how people are going to vote here.

I still want to slap him upside the head for not deluging the media for the pro amnesty pig McCain really is, which could of changed the FL outcome.

]]> By: DEM because I say so.. http://tammybruce.com/2008/02/im_for_romney.html#comment-97833 DEM because I say so.. Sat, 02 Feb 2008 01:56:00 +0000 http://tammybruce.com/2008/02/im-for-romney/#comment-97833 <p>DARK-HORSE-MI says:</p> <p>"I have yet to see one Republican candidate endorse Mitt after withdrawal. Duncan Hunter supports Huckabee (I don't get that); Fred Thompson has yet to endorse anyone (even though his views seemed prettly close to Romney's); and Rudy plugs for McCain (I don't get that either)."</p> <p>For us previous "TANCREDO" supporters...lest we forget:</p> <p><a href="http://marklevinfan.com/?p=2526" rel="nofollow">http://marklevinfan.com/?p=2526</a></p> DARK-HORSE-MI says:

“I have yet to see one Republican candidate endorse Mitt after withdrawal. Duncan Hunter supports Huckabee (I don’t get that); Fred Thompson has yet to endorse anyone (even though his views seemed prettly close to Romney’s); and Rudy plugs for McCain (I don’t get that either).”

For us previous “TANCREDO” supporters…lest we forget:

http://marklevinfan.com/?p=2526

]]> By: Colocelt http://tammybruce.com/2008/02/im_for_romney.html#comment-97832 Colocelt Sat, 02 Feb 2008 01:24:00 +0000 http://tammybruce.com/2008/02/im-for-romney/#comment-97832 <p>Big thumbs WAY WAY up Tammy. I pray that this kind of momentum will work in educating the masses exactly who our candidate this fall should be and that will be reflected next week. I love this post! This is why you are one of my divas!! </p> Big thumbs WAY WAY up Tammy. I pray that this kind of momentum will work in educating the masses exactly who our candidate this fall should be and that will be reflected next week. I love this post! This is why you are one of my divas!!

]]> By: dark_horse_MI http://tammybruce.com/2008/02/im_for_romney.html#comment-97831 dark_horse_MI Fri, 01 Feb 2008 23:55:00 +0000 http://tammybruce.com/2008/02/im-for-romney/#comment-97831 <p>Whoops, that was a typo! MI has 30 delegates, not 20. I suppose they could round that up to 1 after Thompson withdrew. But I don't know which state that one delegate for Rudy came from. It's kind of moot,now. I see as of today he has 0.</p> <p>I'm not sure why Edwards still has 11 delegates since he's also out.</p> <p>Why on earth is Ron Paul still in the race? He has yet to get even one delegate. Give it up, Ron.</p> Whoops, that was a typo! MI has 30 delegates, not 20. I suppose they could round that up to 1 after Thompson withdrew. But I don’t know which state that one delegate for Rudy came from. It’s kind of moot,now. I see as of today he has 0.

I’m not sure why Edwards still has 11 delegates since he’s also out.

Why on earth is Ron Paul still in the race? He has yet to get even one delegate. Give it up, Ron.

]]>