Tammy Bruce: Cindy McCain: Sugar Mommy

Cindy McCain: Sugar Mommy

Yep, I'm there. If McCain can get Cindy, a beautiful smart woman with money who can do whatever she pleases, to stay married to him he must be doing something right. Behold now the new leftist attack strategy against McCain: He's a man who scored and is successful! You know how the fat boys on the left just hate that. If this is the best George Soros' Finger Puppets can come up with, I think we're going to have a rather amusing general election.

Just one suggestion--they better not keep making commercials that make us admire the guy. Oh, I especially like the foreign accent of the moderator--Everything sounds much more important and serious when all these things are said to us by the British instead of by a pesky, bitter, and mean Amerikkkan (HT Hot Air). And I've decided with this post to put Cindy McCain into the Babe category, just for organizational purposes. It's stupid to just not admit the truth.

UPDATE:

Morrissey at Hot Air makes excellent points about 'progressive feminist' hypocrisy on the issue of Cindy McCain's financial independence.

...A lame Lifestyles of the Rich and Famous parody tweaking John McCain for marrying a rich woman, complete with a very bad Robin Leach accent...

Men who didn’t feel threatened by successful women were supposedly enlightened. Men who allowed women to control their own fortunes were supposedly the most enlightened. Now Democrats want to haul out the chauvunistic taunt of “kept man” and “sugar mommy” against McCain for having been enlightened enough to do both?

Wow. That takes some …. nerve.

Posted by Tammy · April 22, 2008 01:31 PM · Permalink
Babes | Politics

Comments

So none of it is true? It's all a pack of lies? That's why I should vote for McCain---to protest these false accusations? Give me a break!

Posted by: jdb at April 22, 2008 02:20 PM

HOW ABOUT SOME STRAIGHT TALK FROM TAMMY!

Hey Tammy,

Where did your McAmnesty campaign death watch go? He looks like he could keel over any day, so put it back up, maybe with a vulture on it. You have really flipped on this guy, so how about some full disclosure on what they did to get you to do it? Or is it simply that MOEbama and hiLARRY make Curly Jack look good?

I am still waiting for his updated medical and psychiatric files--the ones from 2000 are getting a little stale. I'd really like to see what temper medication they have him on. Since he is not coming forward with them, I assume it is really bad, more than just the diaper issue. Oh well, I am sure the Democrats will disclose lots of stuff when the Swiftboarding starts. What a disaster this election process is!

P.S. The narrator accent is Middle Atlantic, I think.

Posted by: Iowa PatN at April 22, 2008 02:47 PM

I think the commercial is a takeoff of Lifestyles of the Rich & Famous, an old program narrated by Robin Leach. If the commercial is suppose to make me resent McCain's prosperity, it doesn't. He achieved the American Dream, good for him - this is what makes our country great - someone can come out of nowhere and make it big. McCain married a wealthy woman who didn't wed him for political glory (unlike Theresa Hines Kerry). McCain didn't grow rich on payoffs, bribes, and sleazy backroom deals like the Clintons. He didn't marry an incredibly successful,yet strangely bitter and self-centered woman either like Obama did. The difference between liberals and conservatives is that liberals are jealous of the success of others while conservatives are happy for them. Dems like to portray Republicans as selfish when Dems are in fact the greedy ones. Champagne wishes and caviar dreams everyone!

Posted by: helpunderdog at April 22, 2008 03:06 PM

"...how about some full disclosure on what they did to get you to do it?"

I'm inclined to say this is crossing the line by attacking Tammy's character rather than than her politics: it's basically saying, "anyone who disagrees with me must have been bought."

Posted by: Dave J at April 22, 2008 06:46 PM

Oh come on you guys. Iowa Pat and everyone else, I have been one of there and I remain extremely critical, but I stopped foaming at the mouth about politics a long tie ago. what this means is I have my principles, I'm honest about them, I'm critical when need be, and honest all of the time.

I am extremely disturbed McCain is the Repub nominee. But I am even more disturbed by Hillary and Obama. There are things I am also beginning to like about McCain Just because I am appalled at his amnesty/border position, doesn't mean I'm not going to tell it like it is when it comes to his current positions economically, of which many I like.

I will not be deciding whether I will vote for McCain until he chooses his Veep. As long as he doesn't choose Huckabee or Grahamnesty, I'll vote for him because he'll be slightly better than Hillary or Barry. And I will compliment *all* of the candidates when I feel like it. I also have a feeling I'll be complimenting Cindy McCain more than anyone else because it gets damn tiring to be mad all the time at people whom you don't like, like the 3 candidates and the two other spouses.

So Pat, I get it, but we have to face reality. I'm mad at the Dems for making McCain the best in this lineup. And I'm furious at Repubs for abandoning the Reagan legacy so distinctly that McCain is the nominee.

Well, *we* haven't abandoned Reagan, nor will we abandon this country because the MalNars who run the parties have collapsed. It just means we hold our nose for four years, and make sure whoever is in the White House know who the boss is--us.

And one more thing, I've worked far too long on the issues that matter to us to have my integrity questioned on this issue Pat. It *is* insulting and I would have expected more from you.

Posted by: Tammy at April 22, 2008 07:17 PM

Ok, ok. If we are reduced to voting for McCain, do we have to sign anything or can we just tell the registrar to "pull my finger"? This election is going to be an excruciating nightmare.

Posted by: jdb at April 22, 2008 08:43 PM

They're probably trying to remind Republicans of the fun we had with John (Mr. Theresa Heinz) Kerry. You'd think after the way they defended Kerry, they wouldn't have the chutzpah to make the same attack on McCain. That's the Dems, though, "When you do it, you're BAD. When we do it, it's OK." (Just ask Michelle Malkin about leftist bigotry and sexism).

Posted by: IrishLad317 at April 22, 2008 09:40 PM

Tammy,
I had the extreme pleasure of attending one of your lectures a couple of years ago, in Torrance,CA.
At that time I asked you a question about the state of the Democratic Party. Your answer, as I recall,was that it loked as if they, the Dems., were sowing the seeds of their own demise. This based upon the fact that the Soros,Move On Org. has become such a powerful player in their thnking.
With each passing day,as I view the "Obama Cult", in action, I see how close you were to the truth.
If the American people allow this man to become President, they will make an irreversable error.
I am getting so tired of people like Pat and JDB. They need to step outside their little cocoon and see the big picture.

Posted by: Sean H. at April 23, 2008 07:27 AM

Steering back to the original gist of the post (i.e. the Dem mudslinging machine), I am inclined to ask: is there a bigger hypocrite POS than David Brock? The guy had nothing but support when he was a conservative. Then he spits in the face of the people that made him a successful writer and turns completely wacko lib. I remember seeing him on CSPAN when he turned Left, babbling on about how he 'never felt comfortable as a conservative'. All that paranoia was in his rock head - there wasn't one thread of truth to any of it. Therefore, he fits right in with the likes of Begala, Soros and their delusional paranoic ilk.

Posted by: PeteRFNY at April 23, 2008 07:29 AM

One mo' thing: lies and accusations by themselves are not a good reason for voting for someone, but sometimes the person they are running against IS.

This country is still feeling the results of eight years under Clinton and the WORLD is still suffering from the damage done by four years under Carter (who continues to DO damage to the world to this very day). Imagine the horrors of four years under Hillary or Obama when howling derisively over the idea of voting for McCain.

A starving man eats the food that he can get, especially if the warehouse is full of poison. Not the most ideal election scenario, but you have to play the cards you are dealt.

Posted by: PeteRFNY at April 23, 2008 07:36 AM

Poll Time

I think we need to get to the more serious point...

Cindy McCain: short hair or long hair.

She first caught my eye a couple years ago, around 2001. She looked absolutely striking with the short do.

Posted by: claudia in ny at April 23, 2008 09:42 AM

I agree with the position attributed to the Danes that is sailing around the web: You have one party where one candidate is a b*tch lawyer married to a lawyer and the other candidate is a lawyer married to a b*tch lawyer.
The other party has a war hero married to a beautiful, wealthy blond with a great chest who owns a beer distributorship.
Where is the contest?

Posted by: St. Thor at April 23, 2008 04:00 PM

Aren't these the same people that wanted us to vote for John Heinz Ketchup Kerry four years ago? I guess maybe it's different if you marry into money if she married into money too.

Posted by: Butch111 at April 23, 2008 06:38 PM

By Category

By Month

Cindy McCain: Sugar Mommy

Comments

Post a comment