Tammy Bruce: Hamas Endorses Barack Hussein Obama

Hamas Endorses Barack Hussein Obama

Seriously. If I were Obama I would be seriously concerned that one of most vile terrorist organizations in the world, one which works directly with al-Qaida, has professed its support of me. But I have a feeling even this will not provoke Barry into any seriousl soul-searching. What it should do is remind you why voting for any Democrat, for president or for congress, is a truly dangerous mistake.

A Hamas problem for Obama?

While Sen. Barack Obama sought to improve his relationship with the Jewish community today by meeting with leaders Philadelphia, comments by a Hamas political adviser this weekend could potentially hurt the Democratic presidential candidate.

During an interview on WABC radio Sunday, top Hamas political adviser Ahmed Yousef said the terrorist group supports Obama’s foreign policy vision.

“We don’t mind–actually we like Mr. Obama. We hope he will (win) the election and I do believe he is like John Kennedy, great man with great principle, and he has a vision to change America to make it in a position to lead the world community but not with domination and arrogance,” Yousef said in response to a question about the group’s willingness to meet with either of the Democratic presidential candidates.

Comments

AL QAEDA'S CANDIDATE IS MCAMNESTY!!!

Michael Scheuer, head of the CIA's Bin Laden unit for many years, has a new book out on the topic of chasing Bin Laden and other anti-terrorist operations. He was on Michael Savage's radio show a few weeks ago, and was asked who he thinks Al Qaeda and Bin Laden want to be President. He said without a doubt McCain and his "third term for W" program, since he will not only keep the borders open to terrorists, he will spend us into oblivion with the "more wars, many more wars" mentality, which is how they think they will defeat us. (I think they may be right as evidenced by the Depression-repellant checks coming out next month.) Mr. Scheuer says the open border is a disastrous policy for our national security. He also said that there were 10 TIMES when his unit had Bin Laden lined up for elimination, but the Clintons took the lawyers approach to "use the legal system" to have him returned here for trial, rather than the war approach to make a grease spot out of him.

So any of the Three Stooges, MOEbama, HiLARRY, or Curly John will be weak on national security with their globalist open borders mentality. Curly John would be the worst, because he will have our troops all over the world chasing rabbits at astronomical cost, when they need to be here protecting us.

There must be two million Americans out there who would be the best President we have ever had. Won't one of you PLEASE step forward for your country and offer yourself as a write-in candidate? We have a lot to lose if you don't!

Posted by: Iowa PatN at April 17, 2008 12:28 PM

If the endorsement by Minister Fartakhan didn't give pause to the Obama cult, why should this? Obama could get endorsed by Lucifer himself, and his disciples would merely proclaim Barry as The One who will finally make peace between heaven and hell.

Posted by: Talkin Horse at April 17, 2008 12:31 PM

Re: Michael Scheuer

He is an anti Israel conspiracy kook. He was the head of the Bin Laden unit and his act ought to have been shut down on or shortly after 9/11.

Posted by: Ripper at April 17, 2008 02:29 PM

Personally, at least 30% of what Michael Savage (real name is "Weiner", so you can understand the NEED for a better radio name) says is ultra-right wing nuttery and conspiracy theories of which I have no use for either.

That being said, while I am still undecided about who to vote for (certainly not Barry or Hillery) and by that I mean McCain, the Libertarians or Ralph Nader (at least Nader is honest...seemingly)

I do think this Hamas endorsement is the kiss of death in a general election. Can you imagine the 527s now? Jimmy Carter, meeting with Hamas, then slowly morphs into Barry with the announcer announcing that Hamas, while a friend of Carter has officially announced Barry for Carter...Part 2.

Posted by: Sparky at April 17, 2008 05:24 PM

Voting for Ralph Nader is akin to voting for Pat Nazi Buchanan. If you do not want to hold your nose and vote for McCain write someone elses name in or do not vote at all.

Posted by: Ripper at April 17, 2008 06:44 PM

Clearly when Hamas endorsed Barack they knew what they were doing. So what really is their intent? Do they prefer Barack because he appears to want to engage with those the Bush has refused to talk with? Personally I have always thought it was a much better idea to keep your enemies closer so they can be watched, than to isolate them and lose them on the radar.

I think we can all agree that Barack is a person that believes that theoretically all things are possible. He communicates well as long as the other side is willing to agree with him. Bush on the other hand, is a lousy communicator and thus his decision to put countries into categories so he doesn't have to deal with them. What we really need is somebody that actually has good listening skills which is rare today. When you listen you can't already be forming your reply, but must absorb the words being said and the tone used.

Posted by: verycold at April 18, 2008 08:43 AM

Hamas prefers Obama because they believe whenever they kill Jews, Obama would not use words or tone so strong against Hamas as he would when ceaselessly pressing "restraint" and "no retaliation" on the Israelis, both personally and by using the UN as a bludgeon.

And al Qaeda likely might prefer Obama because they perceive him as the potential US President least likely to militarily retaliate for another terrorist attack on US soil.

I do agree that keeping our enemies watched closely and constantly is one component in restoring security. It therefore follows that this nation ought to eliminate the leadership and assets of our enemies when good opportunities present themselves. This requires the reestablishment and maintenance of good human intelligence in the brewing kettles of our enemies. It also requires not allowing ideologues with anti-US agendas to run our intelligence agencies.

The US and Israel are not plagued by terrorist threat because we do not "listen" to our enemies. Our enemies' language is intolerance, explosions, destruction, and death. That cannot be negotiated with. It needs to be ruthlessly destroyed more vigorously than they can strike at us, guided by accurate human intelligence.

Posted by: crossroads_gunner at April 18, 2008 10:19 PM

By Category

By Month

Hamas Endorses Barack Hussein Obama

Comments

Post a comment