Comments on: B. Hussein Obama in Afghanistan http://tammybruce.com/2008/07/b_hussein_obama_in_afghanistan.html Independent. Conservative. Unruly. Sun, 12 Feb 2012 09:19:50 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1 By: ahwatukeejohn http://tammybruce.com/2008/07/b_hussein_obama_in_afghanistan.html#comment-95020 ahwatukeejohn Sat, 19 Jul 2008 21:31:00 +0000 http://tammybruce.com/2008/07/b-hussein-obama-in-afghanistan/#comment-95020 <p>Rather they will not be able to put our enemies back in power fast enough.</p> Rather they will not be able to put our enemies back in power fast enough.

]]> By: ahwatukeejohn http://tammybruce.com/2008/07/b_hussein_obama_in_afghanistan.html#comment-95019 ahwatukeejohn Sat, 19 Jul 2008 21:29:00 +0000 http://tammybruce.com/2008/07/b-hussein-obama-in-afghanistan/#comment-95019 <p>Obama going to Afghanistan, Jane Fonda going to Vietnam. Lets wake up here and see that the important question is not his level of concern over the issue of the war on terror (or any leading Democrat's focus on us vs. any of our enemies) but rather what is the outcome desired by the man. THESE PEOPLE ARE THE ENEMY FOLKS.<br /> If elected and put back in full power, these people will not be able to put our worst enemies back in power ASAP.</p> Obama going to Afghanistan, Jane Fonda going to Vietnam. Lets wake up here and see that the important question is not his level of concern over the issue of the war on terror (or any leading Democrat’s focus on us vs. any of our enemies) but rather what is the outcome desired by the man. THESE PEOPLE ARE THE ENEMY FOLKS.
If elected and put back in full power, these people will not be able to put our worst enemies back in power ASAP.

]]> By: artgal http://tammybruce.com/2008/07/b_hussein_obama_in_afghanistan.html#comment-95018 artgal Sat, 19 Jul 2008 19:53:00 +0000 http://tammybruce.com/2008/07/b-hussein-obama-in-afghanistan/#comment-95018 <p>Funny how BO states more military resources need to be devoted to Kuwait and Afghanistan when he said on the video you posted recently that our defense capabilities need to be greatly reduced and even halted.</p> <p>Interesting, too, is that he 'thanks' the troops for the heroic work they have been doing; yet, he would have never sent them to do that heroic work in the first place. He claims to be the only candidate who has been against the war from the beginning - but he was not in office to vote one way or the other. So we really don't know how he would have voted. </p> <p>I guess the state of 'change' he promotes is that which rests on his mood or state of being at any given time.<br /> </p> Funny how BO states more military resources need to be devoted to Kuwait and Afghanistan when he said on the video you posted recently that our defense capabilities need to be greatly reduced and even halted.

Interesting, too, is that he ‘thanks’ the troops for the heroic work they have been doing; yet, he would have never sent them to do that heroic work in the first place. He claims to be the only candidate who has been against the war from the beginning – but he was not in office to vote one way or the other. So we really don’t know how he would have voted.

I guess the state of ‘change’ he promotes is that which rests on his mood or state of being at any given time.

]]>