A post by Maynard
A few words about my take on John McCain.
As I said in my final word about Mr. Obama, I don’t much care what happens after a candidate declares his candidacy. It’s the long history that matters, not the short seduction. Obama’s history shows him to be a water-carrier for bigoted hatemongers. And if that doesn’t make Obama a bigoted hatemonger himself, I don’t know what does.
John McCain has not been the darling of conservatives. But Maynard’s terrible secret is that he has always thought more highly of McCain than do many of his fellows. I’ll explain why.
First, a quick look at our issues with McCain. Just as Obama has spent his life palling around with terrorists and bad guys, so has McCain palled around with liberals and elitists in the Senate. He seems too comfortable with Teddy and Hillary, and his fingerprints were all over the immigration “reform” fiasco, not to mention campaign finance “reform”. He voted against the Bush tax cuts and condemns harsh interrogations of terrorists. Many conservatives wonder how this man can call himself one of them.
My attitude toward McCain is formed in the light of knowing that nobody out there is going to do quite what I want. If there is no “best”, then I must either abandon the contest or support the better man. But the national and global stakes are far too high to walk away from, and John McCain offers quite a lot of “better”.
For starters, McCain has a long record of fiscal discipline. He didn’t hesitate to expose George Bush and his own party as big spenders back when they ran the show. He also tried in vain to sound the warning about the impending collapse of Fannie and Freddie back in 2006. He’s been affiliated with the watchdog group Citizens Against Government Waste. If McCain’s thinking had prevailed on Capitol Hill, we’d be in a significantly better position to weather the current financial crisis.
The importance of a thrifty government that consumes a minimal portion of the national wealth cannot be overstated. Government will always be stupid and wasteful. But the smaller it is, the less damage it does, and the more freedom remains to the citizens. Better a government that squanders 10% of the national treasure than 50%.
And as for McCain’s initial vote against the Bush tax cuts…well, had I known that Bush would turn out to be among the most fiscally irresponsible presidents in history, I too would have voted against the tax cuts. To cut taxes while boosting spending is very bad medicine. I think McCain might have had some notion of where all this was leading.
The record also shows McCain has demonstrated good judgment with respect to military and strategic concerns. Considering what’s going on in the world today, this is a VERY IMPORTANT asset. For example, McCain was on top of the recent troop surge and the result that would come of it, even while so many Democrats got it wrong. He has spoken of other issues where he was ahead of the curve, going back to the disaster in Lebanon during Reagan’s term. His history shows him to be the man who, in retrospect, advocated the right path in tough situations. Of how many people can this be said?
As far as McCain’s liberal Senate friends go…well, as I noted, all candidates fall short of my ideals. President McCain will compromise in some venues, but he’s a stubborn man. We can reasonably hope that he’ll keep the nation focused on the real issues of the day, while achieving a greater national unity than has been seen in the recent era. Contrast that against the nightmare scenario of a hard-Left president pushing a Democrat majority to nail down a hard-Left agenda.
Think about the five years John McCain spent as a P.O.W. His long incarceration under conditions more terrible than most of us can imagine shows him to be a man of incredible grit. And yet, how much does he speak of these things? McCain is very much the quiet hero. See my earlier note, “What sort of man is John McCain”. It’s telling how little McCain speaks of his personal accomplishments; this is in stark contrast to so many of the Washington egomaniacs.
McCain’s humility and stamina are more than just admirable personal virtues. The world is working its way through a rough moment in history, and there are guaranteed to be trying times ahead. The national morale will be reinforced by a president who has been to hell and back and never faltered or complained. McCain will be a leader who, by his very presence, will inspire us. Whatever hard times we may face, we know he’s faced worse. If he could get through, we’re going to make it too, and we’ll do it without whining.
McCain’s great gift is to be the last man standing. He’s not the hare that sprints and dawdles; he’s the tortoise that won’t stop until he crosses the finish line. That’s how he got through Vietnam, where others would have given up. That’s how he got to the top of the ticket, after everyone else had written him off. And that’s how he will — I hope and pray and believe — win this election.
These are muddled times, confusing times, and so people who should know better are tempted by the smooth-talking empty man. We lose ourselves in the details and spin, awaiting the knockout or the “October surprise” that will end the contest. My plea to the nation is to forget all that stuff. The victor we need is the man of the long haul, not the man of the moment.
The assets John McCain brings to the table are overwhelmingly right for the era. He deserves the enthusiastic support from the heartland, and that’s what we must give him.










{ 10 comments… read them below or add one }
Maynard
John McCain has spent far too much time trying to be a “Maverick†but the problem is that when he is a Maverick, he is wrong! Immigration, campaign finance reform, Gang of 14, Guantanamo, water boarding – all of those he was on the wrong side. I think he is shocked that his pals in the media have turned on him and does not realize that the only time they like Republicans is when a Republican is giving grief to his own party. I do not consider McCain to be a conservative at all and I don’t give a damn about his ACU rating either.
Havng said all that about McCain, I will unhesitatingly vote for him because I know that Obama will do immediate and long lasting damage to America. Obama is an American version of Ehud Olmert of Israel.
Senator McCain should have voted agianst the bail out plan and made it loud and clear that it was because of the earmarks. Then grudgingly voted for it as the only viable thing to try to do – if and only if it had been recalled and stripped out the 20% pork tax. That way he would have had some good legs to be standing on.
The very least Senator McCain should do at this point is get the amount and authors of all the earmarks put up on his web site and the RNC website – to keep his promise that he would make earmarkers very public as President. It might make a difference. Start doing it now – a promise kept in advance. Unlike Obama who prattles and babbles and tries to silence the media and hides rather than answering questions.
How scary is it that Obama wants Supreme Court Judges who are sensitive – especially to needs of minorities – rather than performing their duty to uphold our Constitution. The bound duty of every Republican elected this term should be to permanently block any court and/or cabinet appointee who does not have conservative values. Time for the party to show the unity and spine or determination the democrats did over the past couple of decades.
The prospect of an Obamaerica is big time scary for those of us who believe that our constitution gives us rights and freedoms.
I wouldn’t say McCain is the “better” candidate, but definitely the “less bad” candidate.
OT:
Obama Bombshell Redistribution of Wealth Audio Uncovered
Here’s an audio of Obama from 2001 discussing how best to redistribute the wealth:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iivL4c_3pck
Note the discussion isn’t about whether or not it’s right to redistribute wealth…but which manner would be the best way to do it!
He views this as economic justice for minorities.
This man is scary…spread this video around people!
I never have anything insightful to say when commenting on this blog, and I probably should just read it and enjoy it for all that it is without commenting. However, I just couldn’t stop myself from commenting once again…
Maynard, I really enjoyed this post. And I have to say I agree with you – John McCain is the better choice. And I’m voting for him enthusiastically!
http://tinyurl.com/56r5p9
Palestinian terrorists campaign on behalf of Obama from afar
I also meant to say (I’m always in a rush – part of my problem) –
Maynard, you inspired me to get an American Flag to hang on my front porch when I read your post from last week about putting up the “I am Joe” sign at your home along with Old Glory which you already had. I decided that getting a flag was a great thing to do especially considering all of the McCain/Palin signs were stolen off of my street. I think that putting up an American Flag is the same equivalent to putting up a McCain/Palin sign. It’s sending out the same message.
A twelve-year member of the MA GOP State Committee Member, I am at a loss to add to your
considerations of John McCAin, Senator, Veteran, Family Man and fellow American Citizen.
Of course, you know, in this day and age, clarity in judgement is suspect.
Great points. Thanks.
Dave O’Connor
Boston in the Massachusetts Soviet
Excellent treatise, Maynard. I would add one important point: “President Obama” would eventually become “former-President Obama”. Former President Obama would be less that sixty years old. Think about that. We have had 28 years of Jimmy Carter refusing to shut-up and sticking his nose in where it doesn’t belong. Do we want 20 or more years of “Barack Obama, National Scold”?
You must log in to post a comment.