A thoughtful (i.e., meandering and boring) post by Maynard
Many modern social trends disturb me, but occasionally there’s (in the words of the poet) an ironic point of light. (Bonus credit to anyone that can identify that reference, and my respect for anyone that cares enough to Google (in its original form, it’s plural).)
I’m thinking, in particular, of the coolness of “retro”. Martinis, cigars, fedoras…we’re seeing a revival of such things. There is a sense that something precious has been lost, and, like the cargo cults of primitive cultures (am I still allowed to call other cultures primitive?), we instinctively reach for a comforting façade.
This is well and good; I, too, enjoy picking up such nuances. But these are examples of style rather than substance. What is the underlying thing we let slip away?
One way to look at it: I fear that prosperity has eaten away at our sense of purpose. Without the urgency of a mission, what’s there to do besides indulge our shallow appetites?
We collectively share the ghost of a notion that life has more to offer than gluttony and excess. Thus some of us seek purpose in serving something much larger than ourselves. Perhaps we serve God or perhaps we serve Caesar. Maybe we join the Church or maybe we join the Revolution. Each has its points. But it’s not my purpose here to sort out these details.
I, too, believe in our (undefined) national quest. But, being the disagreeable creature that I am, I tilt away from mortal authority and insist on seeking my own higher mission. I will not unquestioningly accept marching orders from the fools and scoundrels of the political world. Sorry, gentlemen, but you are (to put it gently) unworthy.
How did I get onto this rant? I was trying to talk about Star Trek!
But I’ve again misplaced Trek and am thinking instead of A Clockwork Orange. Who remembers Clockwork Orange? It’s a film about a terrible thug that ends up in jail and then gets “rehabilitated”. It explores the question of humanity and free choice.
Stanley Kubrick (the Director) pulled off an impossible task here. In real life, I would simply execute the film’s anti-hero. In a just world, that would be the price of his misadventures. A very straightforward solution to a most awful problem.
But this isn’t a film about real-world justice. Kubrick’s focus here is on the question of whether humans are merely machines to be programmed and reprogrammed. Thus we’re seeing another facet of the quest for the righteous path: Can we find that path for ourselves, or must we be forced onto it? Or maybe some of both — in which case, what’s the proper balance?
I appreciate the model of the invisible but all-present God. This God defines Justice, but He is not coercive in our daily lives. We can get away with whatever transgressions we choose — or so it seems.
If we follow His rules, it is of our own free choice. That consequences are unavoidable and that He will ultimately Judge the world are matters of personal faith.
Dammitall! Once again, I have lost sight of Star Trek. A thousand apologies! Alright, boys and girls, this time for sure.
I was speaking of nostalgic things, and certainly Star Trek incorporates both the aspirations of the past and the hope of the future. I grew up watching the original Star Trek, and James Tiberius Kirk is my captain, now and forever. All others are pretenders.
Oh, yes, William Shatner is still around, and this does my heart good. In fact, he’s created his own YouTube channel.
However, as delightful as Shatner’s modern antics may be, we can’t live in the past. Time moves on, like it or not (and I don’t). In the days of my mis-spent youth, Kirk and Spock looked like this:

Several movies later, they got to this point:

As I approach the threshold of my own decrepitude, I become more and more convinced that we need to balance the energy of youth with the wisdom of age. (You see how philosophy becomes a self-serving thing?) But when it comes to gallivanting around the galaxy, blasting Klingons as we go…well, this just isn’t a job for a geezer.
So I felt a weird rush (a sensation that a lesser person might perhaps describe as “a tingling up my leg”) when I saw Kirk and Spock were back to this, as God meant them to be:

And what sort of movie did they make? I have no idea! I intend to see it cold. But until that happens, I’m looking forward to the show.
To Star Trek! With the not-so-humble entreaty that the present may prove a worthy vessel to convey the past into the future.
And so we beat on, boats against the current, borne back ceaselessly into the past. (That’s another literary reference for all you cognoscenti and pseudointellectuals.)
P.S. I found that last episode with Indiana Jones and the Crystal Balls to be entirely trivial and forgettable, not to mention stupid and ham-fisted. But I did greatly enjoy Watchmen, Debbie Schlussel’s idiotic condemnation notwithstanding.
Maynard,
Nostalgia passes on through generation to generation and to no one genration does it collectively become current. You and I and all readers of this and your post are powerless to conjour anything that is not of our time and our experience. What I am trying to say is we have no control over what was, only what we will do later.
I was with my 95 year old grandmother earlier today. She is not gone, however she is somewhere else right now. She is in a place that is both here and somewhere only the best of us will know.She may not live to Mother’s day.
In my mind and in my heart, I was thinking about when she was born, just as my hero, Ronald Reagan, horses were far more common and gas lights flickered every where. Woodrow Wilson was President and the country had old men who’s minds were all but gone and they fought the Civil War in their hearts and minds. There existed no radio so you relied on what was eventually published by newspapers. Today, you have instantaneous news all the time and you have to spend most of the time reading the news and issues from a hundred different angles, and none of them are the same. Yet 95 years ago you read what wrotten and interpretted your opinion from there.
I once spray painted ‘Baby Killer’ on my Grandma’s front door. THis was the response I gave her after an argument ensued when Nanny and Grandpap said I shamed them because I was a registered 18 year old Republican. Why I was the first in my family. Why I may be the only one still. She did forgive me and I certainly cleaned up the mess. She insisted I never talk politics with her again. I kept my word.
She wanted to see me the other day before she slipped to where ever she may be at. I’ve always known I am her favorite out of her two children and 10 grandchildren. I gave her and my grandfather the hardest time and I know it. Her life is long and still longer. She has forgotten more than I know for sure. In fact unless you are 95 she has forgotten more than all of us.
History never repats itself. No one knows what will happen. And there is nothing you can do about it.
Maynard,
You’ve proven once again why you’re one of my favorite writers on the web (meandering, sure–boring, never). Thanks for pointing me to Auden’s wonderful poem and reminding me of Fitzgerald’s words from “The Great Gatsby”.
“May I, composed like them
Of Eros and of dust,
Beleaguered by the same
Negation and despair,
Show an affirming flame.”
May we all safeguard the sacredness of our individuality and resist the soul-crushing group think that assails us from the left and the right. We are in no way “Clockwork Oranges” but made of pith and peel and free will. Let not our separate and “affirming flames” be subsumed by the fiery rhetoric of one who hopes to extinguish the unique fire that blazes within each of us.
I still can’t wrap my head around the idea of a guy who looks like a 22-year-old ensign playing Captain Kirk.
Ah, yes, Mr. Kennedy, that poem hammers away at me. But perhaps even more powerfully than the passage you quote, there’s the part…
We aspire to this thing we cannot quite reach. And that seems to be fundamental to our existence.
The name “Israel”, given by the angel of God to the patriarch Jacob, is usually (although not universally) translated to mean “Man who wrestled with God”. Somehow, I take comfort in that. We are, for better or worse, in the same boat as the patriarchs.
Congratulations! You win a prize. (And an honorable salute to Mr. Graham as well.) If only you can claim it…
I was going to post my thoughts on Star Trek, but it somehow seems inappropriate amid the posts about Robert’s grandmother and this Auden dude. But since this is the internet and no one can wring my neck through the cable modem, I’ll post them anyway.
Although I am a lover of comic books and assorted other science fiction, I never really got into Star Trek. Over the years, I’d seen a handful of episodes and half-interestedly watched some of the movies, but it never piqued my interest enough to see more. Based on all the hype surrounding Star Trek and the fact that it looked interesting, I figured I’d go see it, which I did yesterday.
The story was really good. Sulu was kick-ass during his fight scene, and Scotty stole the movie. I also enjoyed the scenes with Leonard Nimoy. I found it a bit odd how young the actors playing Kirk and Chekhov were, though based on my limited knowledge of Trek and the circumstances of the movie’s plot I can forgive that. And finally, I thought the green chick was pretty hot.
So in conclusion, I definitely enjoyed the movie, and now want to check out some other Star Trek stuff.