**This post will be updated throughout the show. Refresh the page for additional links.**
Sarkozy Says Full-Body Muslim Gowns a ‘Symbol of Enslavement’
The USS John McCain continues to track NoKo missile ship off coast of China
Guess what just showed up in Iran? The excuse used by Mexico to quell a rebellion is now being used by terrorist Mullahs.
Barack Obama – Narcissist or Merely Narcissistic?
Jon Gosselin has “no idea” where wife Kate is on Father’s Day
Hmm. Clinton cancels trip to Europe after surgery she should use this situation as an opportunity to resign from the train wreck that is Obama. She’d have 3 1/2 years to rebuild and challenge again in 2012.
Too bad this isn’t the NBA. We could trade Urkel and a politician to be named later to France for Sarkozy.
Slightly off topic, I just saw Brit Hume on O’Reilly. Hume is terrific I just wish that O’Reilly would stfu and stop interrupting Hume. O’Reilly always thinks that it is about him.
You know, I love Bill O’Reilly, but I do have to agree… he does interupt a lot. I know, sometimes it’s necessary to control the flow, and it IS his show, and therefore, his agenda. But, that being said, people ( eg.) like Brit Hume, Neil Cavuto, and, well, Tammy Bruce have enough status of their own to warrant listening a bit. Just my perspective, as a still-ardent fan of Bill O’Reilly.
I think Muslim women should be able to dress as they see fit. It’s the way they are treated ( as property, subservient to their husbands ) that I have a problem with.
I was in a restaurant yesterday evening, and a very beautiful, elegant Arab woman swept into the place, dressed in sandals and a long dress draping to the ground, wearing some sort of thin veil about her hair and face. She didn’t appear to be subservient to anyone!
O’Reilly’s problem is that he puts in his opinion that he always thinks is right, when most the time he sounds pretty flippant to me. He seems to ALWAYS disagree with Dick Morris, but Dick Morris is proven to be right 75% and more of the time. Hey, regarding Hillary, my God please don’t let her run. She is nearly as bad as Obama. People call Hillary a moderate, which is laughable. She was a student of Saul Alinsky and it shows.
Early on in Obama’s (Urkel’s) campaign, I noticed there is one of many ways to defeat a man who relies heavily on a teleprompter (crutch). GET INSIDE HIS HEAD AND STAY THERE! When he tries to dismiss a question, make him expound and expound some more. Palin got inside his head and he HATED IT!
Shoot me now for saying this, but given the lesser of two evils, I wish Hillary had been the Dem candidate… I realize it’s like choosing between Batista and Castro, but at least Batista was U.S. friendly, unlike Obama.
I won’t shoot you, daredevil, but I also won’t agree with you. Only two positive things came out of the 2008 elections, and one of them was the fall of the House of Clinton. (the second was that RINO John McCain would never become President).
In 2007 Hilly the Hun was Her Inevitability, the 100%-certain 44th President of the United States. At least, that’s what our self-anointed moral and intellectual betters in the media told us. Journalists spent most of that year fawning over her (sound familiar?), and the only serious issue the airheads at CNN, ABC, NBC, CBS, MSNBC, etc. would discuss was what “role” hubby would play in the Hun’s administration.
It’s true that the Hun would stand a chance of being US-friendly, in the same way many despots will stop just short of completely destroying the country they rule. The Hun and her husband understood that there really was a goose that laid golden eggs (the American free-enterprise system), and while they they could beat, flog, and (in Billy’s case) rape and molest the goose to their hearts’ content, they had better make sure that it stayed alive and churning out golden eggs.
The Won, on the other hand, is America’s answer to Robert Mugabe – a maniacal tyrant who would rather see America annihilated rather than admit that He was wrong.
But the Won’s greatest positive contribution to America – likely the only one – was to keep the Hun out of the Oval Office. Bill and Hillary Clinton – a pair of small-time Arkansas hoods who rode a fawning media and made it to the big time – were ultimately deprived of Presidential power. It is the closest thing that we will see to justice in America these days.
Right now the Won’s Millennial Kingdom looks unassailable. But so did Hilly the Hun just two years ago. The fall of the House of Clinton means that this pair of evildoers will not rule forever – even if a different brand of evil is what defeats it.
I must admit that I too was dumbfounded to see the Clintons derailed. They seemed to be made out of Teflon. I was certain, barring any unforeseen event, that Hillary Clinton would be the next president after GWB. However, if the Clintons could be derailed, so can the [d]Ear Leader. After all, he is no deity [No matter how much his worshipers try to make him so]. I just hope his derailment happens before he does much more damage to the country.
And I’m sure Hillary Clinton doesn’t want to be tainted being connected to a disastrous administration for her future re-run. I think that now she’s showing how smart she really is.
I can’t help but agree with comments about Bill O’Reilly. It’s unfortunate, because he is perceptive and insightful. But he is too anxious to nail a point, not always a person, either. Too many times he’s turned a good interview into an interrogation, making a martyr out of someone who deserves less, or in some cases someone who can deliver more if allowed that next thirty second. (Aha! There’s the rub. Timed segments.)
I bet he never cut off any of those nuns who rammed the Baltimore Catechism down his throat.
Still, I’ll follow him for the topics that make me want to follow-up which I do through other sources. His guest make him. But how often do we tire of someone who believes his own press.
I don’t want to weep with Beck, though his drawing thoughts out people might work. Hannity is just too picky-picky, yippy-yippy, and reflects that parochial type that possesses a ‘little knowledge and a dangerous lip’. I’d like to have aweek go by when we don’t hear he’s worked construction, went to seminary, or drinks beer with Woody Plank of the Oak Wood Boys. Like Beck, he preaches to the converted. Sometimes, as with Beck, I wonder how they lured the guests they got. He jumps the gun quicker than O’Reilly. But over-all, I’m a Fox Hound. But these shows only provide a scent and prudent hounds chase it down.
MWALIMU DAUDI and MVH – Good points, however, the weakness in your premise is how difficult to impossible it will be to take down the cult of personality. Hill-(and Billy) were/are at least seen as flawed humans, regardless of their popularity, and they have chinks in their armor. BHO has a new and improved teflon that Bill never even dreamed existed during his stint. I just believe that as much as I had extreme trepidation about HC, I don’t think we would be in as deep scheiße as we are right now. I could be wrong, but I believe her side would be more willing to hold her accountable and shoot her down for insanely communistic and fascistic ideas – but all of BHO’s disciples (mind you the same ones who wouldn’t have followed HC down the same road were she to try it) find the communistic and fascistic ideas “sexy and fresh and innovative and gutsy” ~ some in his party had better stop huffing from the Obama hookah and wise up to his BS and the devastation to the country that he is causing… some of this stuff will be almost impossible to reverse, even when the more reasonable and logical heads (hopefully) prevail in the 2010 elections.
Let me just be extra clear, I am not wishing HC were President… (I pretty much hate her) but given the lesser of the two evils, I believe she might not be allowed to cause as much collateral damage as BHO is. And I cannot for the life of me believe that there emerged a choice that could not end up being worse for our country than her.
oops, sorry, typo in that last sentence wrong… should have read “And I cannot for the life of me believe that there emerged a choice that COULD END UP being worse for our country than her.”
SHAWMUT, I have to agree with your statement about Sean Hannity. I listened to him for years but rarely listen to him now. Reason is he doesn’t have the intellectual depth to hammer home his arguments, although he is normally correct in what he says. I have literally heard Hannity not defend his arguments using the Constitution and other factual documented data. He JUST doesn’t have the education?