Trouble in Paradise: What’s Michelle To Do?

by Tammy on July 10, 2009 · 17 comments

Now we know we have the Dog-in-Chief (really, if you’re gonna ogle a woman other than your wife, why do it in front of the world’s media?), what’s Michelle to do?

tailtothechief

King Leer?

With this little revelation, that $6,000 clutch she carried while strolling through a Russian forest makes a bit more sense. As does the $1500 little Python number she carried to the ballet.

But what’s a wife to do when her husband, The Once, leers at a 16-year-old girl in front of the world?

I do have a few suggestions:

The $45,000 Louis Vuitton Tribute Patchwork Bag (proving that having money does not mean you have taste)patchworkbag

Or perhaps something a little more reasonable, like the $17,000 Ralph Lauren Crocodile Ricky Bag

Or, of course, being Super Regular Normal People like the Obamas, I thought you could actually carry around a really nice bag that’s not obscenely expensive whether you’re in a forest or somewhere else more practical. Or not. Like this $208 shoulder bag from Cole Haan. Which is still a chunk o’ change, but a far cry from six grand.

colehaan

The more I look at this it’s not for Michelle, it’s more Me–bitter and clingy, Right-Wingy and Snuffy would fit inside perfectly!

Share and Enjoy:
  • Print
  • Digg
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

{ 17 comments }

1 mmeusa July 10, 2009 at 2:31 pm

And, another: http://hotair.com/archives/2009/07/09/caption-contest-first-ogler/
Yes, another 16 year-old from the J-8! Love this post, Tammy :)

2 carol276 July 10, 2009 at 9:38 pm

I had not seen that one!!! He is going to miss date night this week.

3 thierry July 10, 2009 at 3:08 pm

i think it would be hot if she stuck to the widow’s weeds as when they had that audience with the pope- then she could sport one of those reasonably recession priced coffin purses the gothy girls are fond of(some even have miss hello kitty on them!).

going goth would be the perfect metaphor for her husband’s disastrous administration- death of the economy, death of the health of americans, death to the Constitution! nothing says going to hell in a hand basket like a coffin purse, black clothing and an bad, imperious attitude about other people.

4 Hflomberg July 10, 2009 at 4:02 pm

After everything that the “OJT in Chief” has done – this is nothing.

(OJT in Chief – On the Job Trainee in Chief)

5 lawmom90 July 10, 2009 at 6:33 pm

To be completely fair, which I pride myself on being when I am able to do so, I watched the video on Hannity just now. It appeared that he was looking down to help a lady standing next to the little hottie, because he took her hand and watched while she stepped. So I cannot completely blast him and accuse him, after seeing the whole context of the video.

6 Kelly July 10, 2009 at 7:38 pm

That bag is more than I paid for my first three cars COMBINED! And it’s not even that great of a bag, IMHO.

If she’s going to get a bag, get one with some heft behind it. All the better to swing at hubby with. I’m sure Hillary could give her lots of tips on that kind of thing.

7 bhayden July 10, 2009 at 8:57 pm

I saw the picture of Michelle from behind, in that black dress on her way to see the Pope. That girlfriend has a big rear end! The press is all over her buff biceps–check out that butt! Wonder what size dress she wears? I read that none of the fashion designers will tell…… I’m sick of seeing those arms in every picture. Doesn’t the woman have anything with a sleeve?

8 carol276 July 10, 2009 at 9:31 pm

I can not believe she wore that to meet the pope..split up to that big ole rear!!!!

9 mmeusa July 10, 2009 at 9:50 pm

Thank you for such a good laugh! :) Meanwhile, I suggest the “scarf” is really a not-so-subtle fashion statement to usher in Islamic headdress into the U.S., since the liberals consider her such a fashion statement and trend-setter and the government is so pro-Sharia Law. God help this country!

10 Laura July 11, 2009 at 9:01 am

Those are NOT buff biceps….trust me.
However yes her butt is as wide as a bus.

11 lawmom90 July 11, 2009 at 9:41 am

Her designer’s name is Hugh Jass

12 carol276 July 10, 2009 at 9:33 pm

He didn’t look and he didn’t bow…yeah right!!!! Picture worth a thousand words

13 Ginger July 10, 2009 at 10:26 pm

Don’t you love the way the Obamas just flaunt it in our faces? Ya know, my mother just recently sold this old house she had been living in for over 30 years. She sold that thing for 6,000 ! Cheap huh?..yeah, I know, but that was about all it was worth, and my mom was grateful for the money!…and here our “esteemed, oh so classy” first lady is prissing around Europe with a purse reportedly worth the same amount of money as my poor old mom’s house….just trying to put it all in perspective folks…and to top it all off, these two phonies want us all to sacrifice. This is all starting to make me sick.

14 wilde1 July 12, 2009 at 12:23 am

Michelle does not wear sleeves, because she believes her press about the most buff arms. Michelle took her official portrait photo without sleeves. If the press and the Obama administration would review White House history, they would see photos of Jacqueline Kennedy’s 31 year old buff arms ( Pre-weight training craze in 90’s). I hope Govenor Palin is pumping up. I am looking forward to the day that the press has to report the first president to wear a sleeveless gown.

15 Carol July 12, 2009 at 5:57 am

Love that designers name! I noticed that on inaug night when she was wearing the chenille bedspread gown. She should cover her face because she looks like a downright mean person.

16 echosierra July 12, 2009 at 7:13 am

B.O. appears Bullish on Booty!

17 MRFIXIT July 13, 2009 at 10:09 am

And a lovely kaboose it is. You’d think that living with Michellezilla he’da at least learn to be slick about it.

Comments on this entry are closed.

Previous post: CD of the Week: What Tammy’s Listening To

Next post: Where That Obama Picture Came From

Clicky