<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:rawvoice="http://www.rawvoice.com/rawvoiceRssModule/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: </title>
	<atom:link href="http://tammybruce.com/2009/10/daily-tammy-radio-10-26-09.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link></link>
	<description>Independent. Conservative. Unruly.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 23:10:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: bigbud66</title>
		<link>http://tammybruce.com/2009/10/daily-tammy-radio-10-26-09.html#comment-117494</link>
		<dc:creator>bigbud66</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 21:04:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tammybruce.com/?p=27465#comment-117494</guid>
		<description>T,
I&#039;ve listened to the opening of this show over and over to try and understand your point of view on what gingrich said.  While you may be correct in a macro sense about the current crop of republicans, I believe  Republicans or anyone presenting alternative ideas to a failed liberal agenda should not be summarily  dismissed.  In the Podcast I heard -- not just opposition but alternative approaches to the same problems.
Now I don&#039;t recall the couch sitting episode you referenced for which he should be taken to the wood shed, but there must be a set of alternative ideas presented to Americans and Gingrich can be once voice of those ideas, not the only one, but one of the more thoughtful I&#039;ve heard over the last 9 years.  
I love Sarah too, but the only points I take off from her is an &quot;incomplete&quot; on depth.  She may have it, but I haven&#039;t seen it yet.
Resist using templates the way the liberals do and listen closely to the comments made -- there just might be another interpretation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>T,<br />
I&#8217;ve listened to the opening of this show over and over to try and understand your point of view on what gingrich said.  While you may be correct in a macro sense about the current crop of republicans, I believe  Republicans or anyone presenting alternative ideas to a failed liberal agenda should not be summarily  dismissed.  In the Podcast I heard &#8212; not just opposition but alternative approaches to the same problems.<br />
Now I don&#8217;t recall the couch sitting episode you referenced for which he should be taken to the wood shed, but there must be a set of alternative ideas presented to Americans and Gingrich can be once voice of those ideas, not the only one, but one of the more thoughtful I&#8217;ve heard over the last 9 years.<br />
I love Sarah too, but the only points I take off from her is an &#8220;incomplete&#8221; on depth.  She may have it, but I haven&#8217;t seen it yet.<br />
Resist using templates the way the liberals do and listen closely to the comments made &#8212; there just might be another interpretation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

