Maynard is a criminal

This is my (Maynard’s, not Tammy’s!) confession. But it’s really nothing more than another personal rambling rant, and you should skip it.

I’ve been reading a book I mentioned in an earlier post: “Strange Angel: The Otherworldly Life of Rocket Scientist John Whiteside Parsons”. It’s a fascinating tale of how an eccentric tinkerer played a major role in inventing the rocket industry.

Prior to World War II, rockets were regarded by all right-thinking people as less respectable than astrology or phrenology. Rocketry was scorned by all academic institutions. Robert Goddard attempted to discuss the potential, and he was ridiculed to the extent that he became secretive for the rest of his life. Rockets were the stuff of pulp magazines. Then, as now, the world had nothing but punishment for anyone who challenged a political truth.

Jack Parsons was a weird man with a weird dream. He refused to let the world stop him. He showed the world the error of its ways. Ironically, the world rewarded him by elbowing him out of the way in its rush to exploit the pathways he pioneered.

I’m not embracing eccentricity for its own sake. Plenty of eccentric people are merely repulsive, and some are downright dangerous. But out of the eccentrics come the new ideas we need to move forward. A society that crushes its eccentrics is a society without a future.

When I was a child, I was fascinated beyond measure by explosives. The notion of harnessing destructive power was the stuff of dreams. I hasten to add (and this really is true) that my vision was a pure one. I had no desire to hurt people or damage property. I made no demands and I wrote no manifesto. I just wanted the power to create explosions. I wanted to hold that power in my hand.

I guess we’ve all got our crazy childhood fantasies. You dream about them, and then you grow up and put aside these childish things. And I’ve pretty much done that, just like I should. But not straightaway…

When I was 14 or 15, I stumbled across some literature prepared by amateur pyrotechnists. This fueled my fantasies, and I spent my meager allowance money in pursuit of more information. Gathering semi-illicit data of this sort wasn’t easy in those days, prior to the Internet. Over time, I realized that it might actually be possible to accomplish my aspirations.

By the time I was 17, I had my ducks lined up, at least in theory. Formulas, suppliers, a few dollars set aside. Of course I had to operate in secret, knowing that parents and society did not approve. Ordering the more critical components was a tricky business. I had to lie about my age and stick to mail order transactions, relying on postal money orders since I couldn’t write checks. Certain contraband could not be mailed. One particularly critical shipment wasn’t even allowed on the standard alternative carriers; it had to be sent by the Greyhound Bus, which would telephone me when it arrived at the local station. During that interval, I made a particular point of leaping up to answer every phone call, because it was very important that I be the one to answer THE call, or the consequences would have been dire.

Somehow all of this madness came together, and I was, much to my own amazement, ultimately able to construct some really cool explosive devices. These were some of the happiest moments of my warped youthful existence.

I found a couple of similarly-inclined kids at school, and we branched into amateur rocketry. At the peak of our adventures, we were launching home-made bomb-laden rockets into the Pacific Ocean (although it must be admitted that some of them turned around and headed back toward land).

Somehow we were never arrested, never blew ourselves up, never did any real property damage. We didn’t do what we did in pursuit of a political or social goal; we just did it because we loved to do it. We understood that the world intended to stop us if it could; we regarded the world as misguided or even cruel, and we knew we had to carry on in spite of the world.

In noting the world was against us, I also acknowledge that the fact that it was possible for us to operate as we did proves that the world wasn’t entirely against us. That our actions were illegal didn’t prevent us from purchasing the components of our illegal activities. Somebody knew enough to wink at our peccadilloes.

Maybe that’s a reasonable model. The world should offer guidance, but there must be limits to its coercive power. A question, in other words, of balance.

When I was a kid, it was normal for boys to have chemistry sets. And as far as I’m concerned, the main reason to have a chemistry set is to find interesting ways to burn things or blow up things. Isn’t this obvious?

I understand that today the acquisition of chemistry sets is actively discouraged. It’s assumed that a boy with a chemistry set is up to no good. He either wants to burn things or to cook up drugs. So we take away his chemistry set and give him Ritalin™.

I just took a moment to check out how difficult it is to pursue my old recreations. With the Internet, finding stuff is so much easier than it used to be. However, it seems the authorities have caught up with the suppliers. They won’t sell even relatively innocuous items without all sorts of rigmarole and reassurances that you’re officially approved. They’re looking to turn you in to the Authorities.

The balance has shifted. The world, it seems, wants to pummel us into submission more than ever. I shudder to think of what would have become of me had I been born a few years later, when we started drugging our kids. I obviously would have been a prime candidate for the Ludovico technique. Maybe that would have been the best thing for society. Then I wouldn’t be here exchanging these seditious messages.

When I wax poetic, I often get back to this poem. It ends with these lines:

Defenseless under the night
Our world in stupor lies;
Yet, dotted everywhere,
Ironic points of light
Flash out wherever the Just
Exchange their messages:
May I, composed like them
Of Eros and of dust,
Beleaguered by the same
Negation and despair,
Show an affirming flame.

Ah, note the wonderful irony of the chosen metaphor, which I have perhaps interpreted too literally. Yes, I have indeed shown an affirming flame. I’ve created ironic points of light. I’ve done it, and they can’t take that away from me. It seems to me that the pursuit of dreams like these is what life is about. I’ll fight until my last misguided breath not to let them take that dream away from you.

This section is for comments from tammybruce.com's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Tammy agrees with or endorses any particular comment just because she lets it stand.
10 Comments | Leave a comment
  1. IloiloKano says:

    Don’t know exactly why, but I actually enjoyed reading this.

    Thanks… or something.

  2. Pangborn says:

    Maynard,
    Coincidentally, I have often felt of late that some casually cruel madman has strapped me in a chair, clamped my eyes open and repeatedly injected me with near fatal doses of a powerful soporific known as Cable News as he has forced me to watch a bit of the old ultraviolence being perpetrated upon our God-given (and Constitutionally protected) free will. Great Bolshy Yarblockos! I have such a pain in me gulliver.

  3. franknitti says:

    You’re not cured yet, boy.

  4. morecowbell says:

    I loved to blow things up as a kid… once I burned all my eyelashes, bangs and eyebrows off making a bomb out of crushed Estes rocket propellant and a magnifying glass … I remember the explosion and running home fast as a dog. My father laughed till he cried and my mother spanked me with my good friend, ‘The Belt’. That Monday we had class pictures …. in the picture I looked like a tomato with a face… she was pissed at me over that picture for years. Dad still laughs and I don’t do that anymore.

  5. jeaneeinabottle says:

    I just read an article at the National Review named The Mark of McCain and I think I’m now going to be sick. I wish Gov Palin didn’t campaign for that man, enough is enough. Tammy you are so right about these people, McCain, Gramm(?), Mitt and all the other liberals. Do they know how their actions are going to affect the country years down the road? Personally I don’t think they’re that smart to have a vision good or evil. Gosh our fight is not just with elections it has to start with our children, it is that important for this country’s future. Why were we asleep for so long, how in the heck did we let this happen. It will take generations to fix Obama’s damage. Thank God we are paying attention now and thank you Tammy for all you give us.

  6. thierry says:

    jack parsons was able to do what he did- make it possible to go to the moon , basically,- because he was eccentric, someone who we now like to say ‘thinks outside the box’. he applied alchemy to rocketry because he allowed himself the indulgence of doing so. more straight laced ,rigidly scientific minds would never have let themselves go there.

    nikola tesla shares much with jack parsons- and his contributions to our modern world are even more significant . he was an odd, obsessive man who thought that society should be formed as a matriarchy like bees. in a similar manner he was shunted aside, denied the rights to things he invented- like the radio. he is responsible for ushering in the second industrial revolution that made america what she is today-the alternating current motor. tesla was talking about information flying through the air, wireless along with moving pictures- in the 1900s. he was also insistent that energy could be gotten from the air. we’re just starting to go places technologically tesla was on about at the dawn of the last century. like parsons i think it’s tesla’s eccentricity that fueled his genius and took it to such extremes. but i suppose since when is true genius normal? by the very definition it’s abnormal.

    i know when i was young blowing things up, things blowing up was always the most awesome thing ever. then again, we were given unrestricted access to fire works, taken to the smash up derby,no one used seat belts and we were allowed the most dangerous toys that no way would be allowed on the market today. according to the reasoning behind today’s child safety standards none of us who grew up in the late 60s should have lived passed 10 years old.

    not long after your last jack parsons post i found a rocket kit at the goodwill. i never thought about it but i was a little surprised they still made them. it seemed so 1950s. of course i bought it. in the words of beavis,” fire!fire!fire!”

  7. Mrs. Malcontent says:

    I recommend reading Rocket Boys by Homer Hickham. He grew up in a West Virginia coal mining town and became a pre-eminent NASA scientist (when it was still a good thing to be one). My son did his book report on Hickham. Also, Jim Lovell’s book is good, too. They both were facinated by rocketry and explosives and grew up to do amazing things. We need to inspire our sons (and daughters) again. Good post, Maynard!

  8. rustybx says:

    Loved to make things blow up as a kid. Now I’m just an engineer who drives a VW clean diesel to work everyday 😉

    I used to hang out with guys who played BB ball. Basically, a cheap early version of paintball using BB guns. One guy had access to a talcum powder factory. Which we used to make grenades, satchel charges and claymores. Step on the device or trip the wire and a little black powder charge would cover you with a gallon or so of talcum powder. We called it ‘getting Caspered’.

    It was all in good fun. I shudder to think what would happen to my son if he did the same in this day and age.

    • Mrs. Malcontent says:

      In some ways, I feel our children are missing out on something. I think some of these video games they play are more harmful to their psyche than doing the stunts described above.

You must be logged in to post a comment.