Video Of Tammy’s appearance on Fox and Friends earlier today. Check Tammy’s schedule for today.
Related Posts
-
Maxine Waters Tries Walking Back Violent Rhetoric Against Trump
Tammy | February 7, 2021 -
Public Podcast: Weekend Update 1-10-21
Tammy | January 10, 2021 -
Giuliani Says Fight Not Over After SCOTUS Rejects Texas Challenge
Tammy | December 11, 2020 -
Microwave Energy Likely Behind Illnesses of Americans In Cuba & China
Tammy | December 6, 2020
This section is for comments from tammybruce.com's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Tammy agrees with or endorses any particular comment just because she lets it stand.
29 Comments | Leave a comment
You must be logged in to post a comment.
-
Subscribe
For exclusive media, daily podcasts, live TAM Chat & more
Join the Tammy Army
Follow me on Facebook:
Follow @HeyTammyBruceSign In
-
Donate
Donations are always welcome from subscribers and non-subscribers.
FAQs
Thanks for posting…saw it live! Woot!
Fox and Friends Morning Report:
I never watch this morning program; to me it’s a College Campus uStream program run by too clever for their hairdo dimwitted yakking knuckleheads that are prone to verbal gaffes and idiotic comments and asides(or is that ‘Morning Joe’?)(The producers are completely bald from pulling their hairout…) That said…
1st segment @ 614am Central: Topic: The Marriage Thing. Ms.Bruce(w/glasses) was right on point(>50% divorce rate) while sandwiched between the interruptors/overtalkers who’d just escaped from their padded cells.
2nd segment @ 622am Central Topic: The Electability Thing. Ms.Bruce(w/o glasses) who made the point about the Dumb Bastard being a junior Senator and got elected, while the other two ‘panelists’ made no sense to me.
Tammy’s best quip: ‘I’m the Independent!’
Today’s ‘Fun Musical Factoid’: “I Am Women”, written and sung by Helen Reddy is #1 in the U.S.
posted 12/9 755am Texas[Just call me “Lee”] Time.
Tammy looks great there, you can tell she feels better 🙂
Well done Tammy!
I’m a little surprised at Larry O’Connor talking over Tammy like that but I’m not used to watching these sorts of political shows lately. I’ve heard Larry O’Connor guest hosting for Hugh Hewitt and he seems like a reasonable guy but I guess he knows how to play the game when it comes to getting attention on these kinds of shows.
Tammy is the only person who makes any sense on that panel.
The Romney ad is a waste of time, IMO. People don’t care about this, not in 2012. Tammy makes a good point about Obama being married to the same woman all these years yet he’s ruining the country. The numbers people are concerned about are taxes, the deficit, spending and unemployment numbers, not number of marriages.
Looked like a million bucks…don’t tell Obama he will tax you on that!!!!!!Our perfect candidate is Sarah Palin!!!!
Got up at 4 AM to watch the show live. Was worth it. Tammy your comments were great and you looked terrific.
Tammy wins on points! Now Larry O. and Tammy are both former liberals. The difference is, Tammy rejects the entire universe of the left, while Larry seems to still be informed by its sensibilities but who just couldn’t stand being in the swamp. He’s good on some things but he’s clueless on politics.
Best Presidents we ever had President Reagan & President Lincoln. What do they have in common besides conservative?….didnt cheat on wives. I don’t want a cheater. I frankly don’t like any of the field. I can only see one person bringing the fight and she is on hold. No I am not talking about bachmann the two face. We talk about being real and we are willing to settle and not voice our demand of the true conservative to run for us. That is not the American Spirit We The People should not settle; we never did w/the revolution, civil war, WW1, WW2 and why should we just sit back and pick from a lot of rotten candidates. We deserve the best; because we are the best. Every time we settle we loose. That is a fact.
Nice Tammy, got in some good points.
Did Tammy give any mentions of Sarah Palin? Jedidiah Bila did twice on Red Eye Wedensday night. More columns are coming out including Larry Sabato, and now News and Review looking for a more Conservative candidate that a dark horse could still emerge and get in the spring. There are still moves to get Sarah Palin to ‘Reconsider” and get in as a Dark Horse, they call it “Vote Rogue”. Iowa has an underground movement.
Niner, it’s taken some time but I have come to accept Gov Palin’s decision not to run. I’m sure she gave it very careful consideration and may have things planned for the future. Should she change her mind, I’m there 100% but right now we have to deal with reality…Newt vs Romney? NEWT!!!!
I wake up at 4am PST to feed the dogs as I always do. Dogs fed, I sit down to watch Fox as I always do. OMG, there is Tammy, surrounded by bombast. Loved seeing and hearing Tammy (the only adult in the room) offer her expert commentary while the 2 knuckleheads (I don’t know who they are)wasted my time and it seemed got the most face time. Oh well. Is that how the game is played? If I may borrow a phrase, “ditto-cam, Tammy”. Also, you need to be the ONLY talking head like when Oreilly talks to Krauthammer. Thanks for listening.
Good stuff Tammy! I like the glasses.
Tammy Bruce, the only one talking any kind of sense on that panel. Aye-yi-yi what a hot mess your bookends were there Tammy. Kudos on managing to get in at least a couple of great points!
New question for the next “Tammy Bruce Survey”…..Tammy with or without her glasses! 😀 Its a tough one IMO!
Great job Tammy, you didnt look or act like you had jet lag and no head explosions talking about the Tubby One! Bravo! Standing O!
Ms. Bruce, You are the smartest person in the media, hands freakin down! So you are jet lagged, sleep deprived and raising the bar of that panel single handedly. My husband saw it live and said that it was the best discussion he’s seen on Fox and Friends. I just watched here and am impressed as always. Love the glasses, as well!
What a stupid panel, Tammy got drowned out by the two bozos on each side of her. Steve Doofus is a lame host that shouldnt be doing Politics, and who in the hell is Larry O Connor, what a wack job, I read Breitbart all the time, I havent seen a Larry O Connor, geeeez, couldnt they come up with a better panel. If I was Tammy I would have taken a shot at Mr. Bombast slob, Im tired of everybody pandering to this RINO, faux, Conservative, loud mouth.
If this is the final battle — Newt versus Romney — well, all I can say is I’m glad I’m not making the choice by myself, because I just don’t know. Newt has done everything right lately — but we can recall his blunders (the “Greek Tragedy” was only a few months ago); can Newt stay on track until the election? I’ve got to give Romney credit for playing his hand steadily and perfectly throughout the campaign. So do I want to bet on Newt, who may save the nation in a way that nobody else can, but he also may self-destruct? Or play it “safe” with Romney, who will do vastly better than Obama — but maybe that’s not good enough to save us from catastrophe? I feel a gut level inclination to go with Newt because maybe that’s the only path on which salvation may be found — but I’m painfully aware that I may come to regret that logic.
The choice of a VP will be important. Maybe Newt needs a stable anchor; maybe Romney needs a partner who will think outside the box. (So maybe Newt’s VP is Romney, and Romney’s is Newt? Probably not going to happen that way, but it’s an interesting notion. For better or worse, that’s how we got Bush I.)
At the end of the day, whichever way it falls, I’m on board. Obama must be stopped.
Newt needs someone like Rudy Giuliani as his VP — someone already vetted, well-liked and mildly charismatic. I know some people want Rubio or West, but they are too new to the political scene and will be easily Palinized by the LSM and the left. The final few months of a Presidential campaign is no time to vet a VP candiate (2008 was an exception, but even that we learned a lesson). After the primary bloodbath, I don’t see how Newt will want Romney as his VP.
But first, Newt has to win the nomination. I worry about his campaign organization. How the heck did they miss the Ohio filing deadline? It’s stuff like this that’s worrisome.
I think Newt has a better chance against Obama precisely because he doesn’t play it safe. You won’t defeat Obama by playing it safe.
Cheryl Lee Ralph? Seriously? Was this FoxNews or Joy Behar? I could have lived with Tammy giving her a backhand.
Tammy, you were the only adult on the set…wow, I wish they would have let you talk more. You were superb as always…made me proud to be a TAM.=)
Sheryl LEE Ralph.. egads.. like chalk on a blackboard…you were the most poised, classiest,and strongest one, Tammy.
Larry O’Connor was correct in pointing out that Axelrod would go after divorce records as was done with Jack Ryan in Illinois during the 2004 elections. Once the records were opened, Ryan was abandoned by the already beleagured IL GOP though he wanted to stay in the fight. So what was the GOP’s answer? Bring devoted family man Alan Keyes to IL and run him against devoted family man Obama. Oh, and how well that worked!
Aside from that acknowledgement by O’Connor, I think the lesson from IL 2004 should not be ‘Newt’s divorced so his records will be opened by Axelrod’ as much as it should be ‘Why are Axelrod and his pals at The Chicago Tribune able to wield such power yet, Obama’s records are still sealed?’ We should be more concerned about the Stalinesque nature of the Obama machine when it comes to their behavior toward opponents than trying to placate the left (again) by jacking up Ken Doll for President. Besides, we all know Newt has been married/divorced multiple times. Yadda yadda yadda.
Larry O’Connor’s attitude was quite smarmy towards Tammy. In fact, if Tammy and Sheryl were at a bar playing pool, Larry would be the guy who inserts himself into their game with the typical jackwagon attitude of ‘No Ladies, this is not how you play. Here, let me show you.’ Tranlation: ‘This (politics) is too tough for you delicate flowers, so let me, the big all-knowing guy, take over and speak out about that which you do not know.’
Message to O’Connor: Tammy made it clear that having a faithful nuclear family man does not ensure good governing. We have the current White House occupier as proof. Besides the veneer of being married for a long time, how about looking at Romney’s governance of his own household through his governorship in Massachusetts? The results seem pretty chaotic to me especially where Romneycare was/is concerned. Michelle Malkin also has video from Romney as Governor praising Ted Kennedy for support on the state’s healthcare bill that has resulted in reduced quality of care, poor oversight and massive spending.
So how does this relate to Romney as a family man devoted to the same woman for 25, I mean, 42 years?
Romney’s behavior on that issue alone speaks of something along the lines of being a control freak, imho. One would have to be to support a big-government entity of any sort really, but especially government-run healthcare.
We should also consider the amount of energy it took to eliminate all his email correspondence as governor, too. It’s a shame the same energy was not used to fight the failing system of Romneycare in MA, but on emails.
Whatever the contents of those emails – contents worthy of total elimination – that would certainly be of interest to Axelrod!
Yes, Artgal! And I would like to add to your list: Columbia Professor Rashid Khalidi, who served as Yasser Arafat’s spokesperson for the Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO). He is a well-known Obama buddy, and Obama praised his friend at a dinner in Khalidi’s honor, several years ago. (Here’s a choice nugget from the “wisdon” of Khalidi: “The tragedy of September 11 was a godsend.” Google “Rashid Khalidi Obama” and you can see more “dirt.”) The L.A. Times is reported to have a video of the dinner, but refuses to release it.
Why hasn’t this video been released????
I’m no expert, a la that annoying person who pops up on O’Reilly periodically, but I thought Tammy’s body language said volumes about the other two on the F&F panel.
Considering that she isn’t in NY often, it’s unfortunate the Fox couldn’t come up with better panelists who are more intelligent and less bombastic & cartoonish.
The Money & Power panel was much more appropriate and the discussion at a higher level.
Bravo to Tammy for excellent work as always. Like the glasses!
When I watch Tammy on shows like these, I feel as if I’m watching my friend and sharing her with the world. As usual, Tammy’s class and intelligence put the 2 dolts two shame. I knew she’d be all over that ‘electability’ comment! Doocy is in way over his head with this type of subject matter (ie requires quick thinking and a brain). Can’t even get the guests’ names right. Why three panelists? So no one has time to actually make a point? Wish it was just two (or Tammy alone!) and one sharp moderator, like Asman or Baier or Megyn. So proud to be a TAM. (I vote YES on the glasses)
This is going to sound like a kissup but it is not. Tammy was surrounded by idiots up there. The host is an incompetent joke, Sheryl Lynn, Lee, whatever, is not too bright, and Larry O’Connor is disappointingly a Romney stooge. Tammy did not get to make the most important point because of the interruptions. We all know Newt’s warts already and we are still looking at him.