<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:rawvoice="http://www.rawvoice.com/rawvoiceRssModule/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Overall Reaction to Obama&#8217;s Speech: Uh, Not Good.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tammybruce.com/2012/09/overall-reaction-to-obamas-speech-uh-not-good.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tammybruce.com/2012/09/overall-reaction-to-obamas-speech-uh-not-good.html</link>
	<description>Independent. Conservative. Unruly.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 07:47:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Maynard</title>
		<link>http://tammybruce.com/2012/09/overall-reaction-to-obamas-speech-uh-not-good.html#comment-156327</link>
		<dc:creator>Maynard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Sep 2012 09:52:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tammybruce.com/?p=61676#comment-156327</guid>
		<description>I certainly wouldn&#039;t tell you to be interested in something that doesn&#039;t interest you. Some of this is personal taste, and there&#039;s no arguing that. We like what we like.

You probably know this, but I&#039;ll note that Noonan was one of Reagan&#039;s speechwriters, meaning that RR himself saw something in her. And she wrote a book about that era, &quot;What I Saw at the Revolution&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I certainly wouldn&#8217;t tell you to be interested in something that doesn&#8217;t interest you. Some of this is personal taste, and there&#8217;s no arguing that. We like what we like.</p>
<p>You probably know this, but I&#8217;ll note that Noonan was one of Reagan&#8217;s speechwriters, meaning that RR himself saw something in her. And she wrote a book about that era, &#8220;What I Saw at the Revolution&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sandyl</title>
		<link>http://tammybruce.com/2012/09/overall-reaction-to-obamas-speech-uh-not-good.html#comment-156319</link>
		<dc:creator>sandyl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Sep 2012 18:35:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tammybruce.com/?p=61676#comment-156319</guid>
		<description>Good point Maynard. I do want everyone in our camp. I am not calling for the mocking of anyone. As far as a blemished past, I used to be a Democrat. I just have no interest in Noonan&#039;s opinion, but I am coming from the position of never having seen Noonan as someone who was relevant. Simply a talking-head, speech writer. An elitist who thinks her opinion is relevant because she is somehow &quot;above it all,&quot; and can therefore impart her wisdom to us. 

This is the problem I have with liberals, they live in the world of theory and never fully see or realize the impact of policies on real people. To them it is only an academic, political discussion/debate. I know that the 24 hour news cycle has become less about news and more about talking heads having these academic discussions, but I don&#039;t place much relevance in any of them. Which is exactly why I choose to listen to &quot;talking heads&quot; like Tammy and others. To me they are doing what they do out of a real concern and love for America and its people. To them it is not merely an academic or political discussion because they understand the real impact of policies and politicians on real people.

I think the only place we differ is that her opinion is of interest to you, but not to me. I guess in the end, no matter how we get there, the important thing is that we all see the truth in things.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good point Maynard. I do want everyone in our camp. I am not calling for the mocking of anyone. As far as a blemished past, I used to be a Democrat. I just have no interest in Noonan&#8217;s opinion, but I am coming from the position of never having seen Noonan as someone who was relevant. Simply a talking-head, speech writer. An elitist who thinks her opinion is relevant because she is somehow &#8220;above it all,&#8221; and can therefore impart her wisdom to us. </p>
<p>This is the problem I have with liberals, they live in the world of theory and never fully see or realize the impact of policies on real people. To them it is only an academic, political discussion/debate. I know that the 24 hour news cycle has become less about news and more about talking heads having these academic discussions, but I don&#8217;t place much relevance in any of them. Which is exactly why I choose to listen to &#8220;talking heads&#8221; like Tammy and others. To me they are doing what they do out of a real concern and love for America and its people. To them it is not merely an academic or political discussion because they understand the real impact of policies and politicians on real people.</p>
<p>I think the only place we differ is that her opinion is of interest to you, but not to me. I guess in the end, no matter how we get there, the important thing is that we all see the truth in things.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Maynard</title>
		<link>http://tammybruce.com/2012/09/overall-reaction-to-obamas-speech-uh-not-good.html#comment-156276</link>
		<dc:creator>Maynard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Sep 2012 09:12:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tammybruce.com/?p=61676#comment-156276</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2012/09/07/clint-eastwood-talks-about-convention-chat-with-chair/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;FoxNews: &quot;Clint Eastwood talks about convention chat with chair&quot;&lt;/a&gt;.

Interesting discussion. Eastwood&#039;s rambling style conveyed the sense of an extemporaneous dialogue, but maybe he was just struggling with a script? No, it really was impromptu; even the chair part. Guy backstage offered him a chair to sit down; he put it to use. Very nice.

Someone from the other camp had mentioned the event to me. Seemed under the impression that &quot;everyone&quot; thought Eastwood had messed up. Funny how that social immersion works. I thought &quot;everyone&quot; was impressed.

What&#039;s the objective reality? Well, here we are, still basking in the moment, and pointing at empty chairs and chuckling. Sometimes something touches a nerve. We know when it happens, although sometimes we don&#039;t know why. It happened here. I say that because I saw it and felt it, not because it&#039;s my talking point. There&#039;s no denying that Eastwood hit it out of the park.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2012/09/07/clint-eastwood-talks-about-convention-chat-with-chair/" rel="nofollow">FoxNews: &#8220;Clint Eastwood talks about convention chat with chair&#8221;</a>.</p>
<p>Interesting discussion. Eastwood&#8217;s rambling style conveyed the sense of an extemporaneous dialogue, but maybe he was just struggling with a script? No, it really was impromptu; even the chair part. Guy backstage offered him a chair to sit down; he put it to use. Very nice.</p>
<p>Someone from the other camp had mentioned the event to me. Seemed under the impression that &#8220;everyone&#8221; thought Eastwood had messed up. Funny how that social immersion works. I thought &#8220;everyone&#8221; was impressed.</p>
<p>What&#8217;s the objective reality? Well, here we are, still basking in the moment, and pointing at empty chairs and chuckling. Sometimes something touches a nerve. We know when it happens, although sometimes we don&#8217;t know why. It happened here. I say that because I saw it and felt it, not because it&#8217;s my talking point. There&#8217;s no denying that Eastwood hit it out of the park.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Maynard</title>
		<link>http://tammybruce.com/2012/09/overall-reaction-to-obamas-speech-uh-not-good.html#comment-156275</link>
		<dc:creator>Maynard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Sep 2012 08:54:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tammybruce.com/?p=61676#comment-156275</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s exactly the reason Noonan is relevant. She saw things differently. Her visions have evolved differently. And there are others like her. That&#039;s how Obama took the prize in 2008. If Noonan finds more common ground with us today than she did in 2008, that&#039;s an important thing. If we want to win the coming election, we&#039;ll need people like this on board. These are exactly the people we must build bridges with. That&#039;s how we&#039;ll win 2012 after losing in 2008.

If, on the other hand, we&#039;d rather lose, then we should shun and mock everyone that got it wrong last time around. Let&#039;s see how many of them we can drive back into Obama&#039;s camp. And shun Tammy while you&#039;re at it; her history is blemished too.

Also, I&#039;ll be generous with Noonan because I find her thought-provoking. Her arguments are reasoned. I can see where she&#039;s coming from. I may argue with her on some points, but she rarely says things I consider too ridiculous to contemplate.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s exactly the reason Noonan is relevant. She saw things differently. Her visions have evolved differently. And there are others like her. That&#8217;s how Obama took the prize in 2008. If Noonan finds more common ground with us today than she did in 2008, that&#8217;s an important thing. If we want to win the coming election, we&#8217;ll need people like this on board. These are exactly the people we must build bridges with. That&#8217;s how we&#8217;ll win 2012 after losing in 2008.</p>
<p>If, on the other hand, we&#8217;d rather lose, then we should shun and mock everyone that got it wrong last time around. Let&#8217;s see how many of them we can drive back into Obama&#8217;s camp. And shun Tammy while you&#8217;re at it; her history is blemished too.</p>
<p>Also, I&#8217;ll be generous with Noonan because I find her thought-provoking. Her arguments are reasoned. I can see where she&#8217;s coming from. I may argue with her on some points, but she rarely says things I consider too ridiculous to contemplate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sandyl</title>
		<link>http://tammybruce.com/2012/09/overall-reaction-to-obamas-speech-uh-not-good.html#comment-156268</link>
		<dc:creator>sandyl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Sep 2012 00:51:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tammybruce.com/?p=61676#comment-156268</guid>
		<description>Thx!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thx!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: angelaisms</title>
		<link>http://tammybruce.com/2012/09/overall-reaction-to-obamas-speech-uh-not-good.html#comment-156266</link>
		<dc:creator>angelaisms</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Sep 2012 23:29:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tammybruce.com/?p=61676#comment-156266</guid>
		<description>I encourage you to use it as often and as loudly as you like. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I encourage you to use it as often and as loudly as you like. <img src='http://tammybruce.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sandyl</title>
		<link>http://tammybruce.com/2012/09/overall-reaction-to-obamas-speech-uh-not-good.html#comment-156263</link>
		<dc:creator>sandyl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Sep 2012 20:31:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tammybruce.com/?p=61676#comment-156263</guid>
		<description>I just have to ask ... Why is Noonan relevant? She was fawning over DB in 2008. She should shut the pie-hole and go away. IMHO.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just have to ask &#8230; Why is Noonan relevant? She was fawning over DB in 2008. She should shut the pie-hole and go away. IMHO.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sandyl</title>
		<link>http://tammybruce.com/2012/09/overall-reaction-to-obamas-speech-uh-not-good.html#comment-156262</link>
		<dc:creator>sandyl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Sep 2012 20:24:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tammybruce.com/?p=61676#comment-156262</guid>
		<description>Angela, don&#039;t beat around the bush (no pun intended) tell us how you really feel. :)

PS love DB&#039;s new name Pres. AutoPen! May I use it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Angela, don&#8217;t beat around the bush (no pun intended) tell us how you really feel. <img src='http://tammybruce.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>PS love DB&#8217;s new name Pres. AutoPen! May I use it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sandyl</title>
		<link>http://tammybruce.com/2012/09/overall-reaction-to-obamas-speech-uh-not-good.html#comment-156261</link>
		<dc:creator>sandyl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Sep 2012 20:20:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tammybruce.com/?p=61676#comment-156261</guid>
		<description>LOL me too</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>LOL me too</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sandyl</title>
		<link>http://tammybruce.com/2012/09/overall-reaction-to-obamas-speech-uh-not-good.html#comment-156260</link>
		<dc:creator>sandyl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Sep 2012 20:14:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tammybruce.com/?p=61676#comment-156260</guid>
		<description>We can thank Obama for waking the sleeping giant, and now we can thank him for exposing the DNC for who &amp; what they really are.....as fake as the faux Greek columns and Fauxcahontis and just as useless too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We can thank Obama for waking the sleeping giant, and now we can thank him for exposing the DNC for who &amp; what they really are&#8230;..as fake as the faux Greek columns and Fauxcahontis and just as useless too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
