benghaziattack

Reporting from Adam Housley on a remarkable effort by the New York Times to either rehabilitate Hillary or protect Obama from impeachment. Either way, it’s being called out for being a bizarre resurrection of a debunked theory. Here’s the Housley report and other background and reaction. The days the NY Times determined reality are over. It’s about time they knew it.

Via Fox News.

Fifteen months after the Sept. 11 attack in Benghazi which killed Ambassador Chris Stevens and three other Americans, the narrative of the attack continues to be shaped, and reshaped, by politicians and the press.

But a New York Times report published over the weekend has angered sources who were on the ground that night. Those sources, who continue to face threats of losing their jobs, sharply challenged the Times’ findings that there was no involvement from Al Qaeda or any other international terror group and that an anti-Islam film played a role in inciting the initial wave of attacks.

“It was a coordinated attack. It is completely false to say anything else. … It is completely a lie,” one witness to the attack told Fox News.

The controversial Times report has stirred a community that normally remains out of sight and wrestles with how to reveal the truth, without revealing classified information.

Daily Caller: Ex-CIA analyst: NYT Benghazi article ‘an effort to revive discredited theory’ of anti-Islam video

Weekly Standard: Times Ignores Evidence of Al Qaeda Link to Benghazi; Contradicts previous reporting from the New York Times.

Breitbart: New York Times Wonders: Was Chris Stevens Out of His Depth in Benghazi?

Althouse: A Republican and a Democrat from the House Intelligence Committee say the NYT got its Benghazi story wrong.

Via Nice Deb: John Bolton Calls NY Times Benghazi Report ‘An Editorial Opinion Piece Masquerading as Journalism’

This section is for comments from tammybruce.com's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Tammy agrees with or endorses any particular comment just because she lets it stand.
6 Comments | Leave a comment
  1. Maynard says:

    Correct me if I’m wrong, but I don’t think the NYT said the Benghazi attack was other than a military assault (i.e., military tactics, military weapons). They may raise questions over relatively peripheral points, but nothing they said contradicts the fact that Obama and Hillary and Rice concocted a false scenario (“civilian demonstration, in response to a YouTube video, and it got out of hand”) out of whole cloth. So instead of attending to the security of our embassy and its staff or apologizing for their failures of vision and tactics, Obama and Hillary and Rice turned this tragedy into an opportunity to bash the heartland for Islamophobia and to again apologize to the world, and to throw an American citizen in jail for the crime of making a YouTube video. Did the NYT do anything other than distract and obfuscate, presumably for the purpose of taking the heat off Hillary?

    • Alain41 says:

      My remembrance is, the NYT originally just reported the Administration Susan Rice story. It’s change now is to say, yes it was a military-style assault but it was amateurish thugs inflamed seizing opportunity, no planned attack by a terrorist organization like Al-Quaeda.

  2. Piratin says:

    The NYT is sadly simply a farce.

  3. JHSII says:

    That’s Pulitzer material from the New York Times!!

    And if you don’t believe me – Walter Duranty STILL has his Pulitzer.

    Nice to see reporting hasn’t changed at the New York Times in 80 years.

  4. Dave says:

    Sunday morning I went out to a local deli to grab a sandwich, as I was waiting I looked down and saw the cover story on the NYT. I see the word ” Benghazi” and I get very interested. I started reading it, ( did not pick it up, you can get liberal diseases from that paper) and could not believe the crap this paper was putting out as ” news”, and I was thinking… put this out on a Sunday morning where it will slip by some of the major news reports??,
    I am very glad this showed up on Tammy’s page ( its why I’m here! )…. because it had been bothering me all day.

    Benghazi is my #1 issue with this President and Hillary Clinton.( my list is long , so thats sayin something) .
    I want them held accountable for 4 dead americans on our own soil.. Obamacare has become self evident, but they REALLY WANT TO KEEP SPINNING THIS BENGHAZI THING, which is tellin me, wheres theres smoke theres fire, btw, I still thing Eric Holder should be in prison too. ( tapping fingers waiting )

    All that said, I’d like to wish any TAMs reading this a Happy New Year , and lets Hope 2014 is a return to 2010 voting!
    Thanks to Tammy Bruce for another year of excellence!And all the fun I’ve enjoyed wit the TAMs!! THANK YOU ALL.
    Now…what happened in Benghazi and who’s responsible??????

  5. radargeek2 says:

    Demoncrate media covering her YAss for Hillery of course. Repeat the lie often enough…

You must be logged in to post a comment.