new yorker cover

The New Yorker was once a great literary magazine.

Now, it’s just another Lib mag/rag, not worth the paper it’s printed on.

Via Twitchy: Gee, who’s missing? Greta Van Susteren sees lib agenda behind New Yorker’s GOP cover

The cover of the New Yorker shows Hillary Clinton doing an impression of the media trying to get into one of her events while looking at a GOP field consisting of all men, some of which haven’t even announced they’re running yet:

This section is for comments from tammybruce.com's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Tammy agrees with or endorses any particular comment just because she lets it stand.
4 Comments | Leave a comment
  1. dennisl59 says:

    Notice thru the locker room door, you’ve got Clinton in the ‘hands up, don’t shoot’ pose.

    And a related story.This explains the kids, but what about the adults at the New Yorker?

    http://nypost.com/2015/05/26/new-yorks-pollution-and-poverty-are-killing-kids-iq-study/

    posted 5/26 736am Texas[It’s Stopped Raining]Time

  2. Alain41 says:

    White Hispanics, the fastest growing shibboleth in the dinosaur media. (One could also mention Bobby Jindal.)

    I do like the unintended symbolism of Hillary in this drawing. It’s like she’s looking out a porthole on the Titanic. As for the apparent intended symbolism of Hands Up Don’t Shoot, don’t worry Hil, we’ve found that sniper and it is you. Your hoped for votes sleep with the server.

  3. Vintageport says:

    Wow, The New Yorker needs a new artist for its covers. And is Marco now the new white Hispanic? And jogging shoes for Krispy Kreme?

  4. Cathode Rays says:

    Obviously, they aren’t seeking journalistic credibility outside of their small bubble. That’s fine — they’d waste their effort because they have none.

You must be logged in to post a comment.