Whether or not you are on the “Trump Train,” kudos to The Donald for daring to bring the topic of Bill Clinton’s history of sexual assault back into the news, something the Dems and their lapdogs in the Legacy Media would rather we would all ignore.
Although CNN commentator Errol Louis mentioned that fourteen women had claims of assault by Clinton, the number, as reported by Weasel Zippers, is over 14.
And this, from WSJ: The Clinton War on Women
….Mr. Trump is rude and crude, but in this case he is raising an issue that rightly bears on the 2016 election campaign and the prospect of a third Clinton term. Mrs. Clinton wants to use her gender both as a political sword and shield to win the White House. The purpose is to make male politicians less willing to take her on, while reinforcing her main and not-so-subtle campaign theme that it’s time to elect the first woman President.
So she and her allies will try to spin any criticism as sexist. Even politically correct Bernie Sanders got this treatment after he said during a debate this autumn that “all the shouting in the world” wouldn’t keep guns out of the wrong hands. Mrs. Clinton later said that “I haven’t been shouting, but sometimes when a woman speaks out, some people think it’s shouting.” Against Republicans, she’ll play the “war on women” theme non-stop.
Yet no one in American politics better personifies a war on women than Mrs. Clinton’s husband. For readers too young to recall the 1990s, we aren’t merely referring to Trumpian gibes about female looks or “Mad Men” condescension. Mr. Clinton was a genuine sexual harasser in the classic definition of exploiting his power as a workplace superior, and the Clinton entourage worked hard to smear and discredit his many women accusers….
We rehearse all this not merely to reinforce Mr. Trump’s claims of a Clinton double standard. The point relates to the standards that would prevail in another Clinton Presidency.
…if Mrs. Clinton wants everyone to forget about Bill’s harassment of women, she ought to stop playing the sexism card, or drop Bill as surrogate, or both.
Via NewsBusters:
“Is that right? Fourteen??” That’s Alisyn Camerota, 1:21 into the video clip. The shock and incredulity in the voice of the CNN host is stupendous! Yes, who could possibly imagine that, as CNN commentator Errol Louis stated, there are 14 women who could potentially make allegations of improprieties against Bill Clinton….
LOUIS: Well, if you go to the sort of right-wing websites and the talk radio crowd. There are about 14 names out there.
Related:
The Hill: Trump dares Bill Clinton to talk about women’s issues
Breitbart: Paula Jones: Hillary Clinton ‘Two Faced,’ ‘Liar,’ ‘Cares Nothing About Women at All’
CNN: NH GOP lawmaker heckles Hillary Clinton over Bill Clinton’s sex scandals
Umm, Actually 25 at last count and that doesn’t include the children he’s victimized on Epstein’s Orgy Island.
That’s just Bill Clinton, an old perverted creep. After all look who he paired up with,
the old Mata Hari witch.
I would have put the count at 41+. Anybody who says Bill Clinton’s womanizing is off limits is smoking some seriously bad dope. If Hillary thinks that having Bill campaigning for her is a good thing, I wish her luck.
Today’s media isn’t 1990s media. I’m sure that the Clinton News Network regrets that. The 21st Century is calling, It feels their pain.
The quote of a generation: “You should put some ice on that.”