hillaryftn2

Her response? She spins nonsense, of course. Additionally, for her to make a rare Sunday morning talk show appearance tells you they know this is a problem. Which we should never assume considering they live in a bubble on the planet Jupiter. As far as Dickerson goes, he was fine, but was chosen because there was a presumption, I’m sure, that he’d be somewhat gentle. I’m sure she would have preferred Stephanopolous but that relationship has already come under criticism considering his obvious past as a member of the Clinton team and donor to the Clinton Foundation.

Via Hot Air.

“Aren’t you ordering [Jake Sullivan] to violate the laws on handling classified material there?” John Dickerson confronted the Friday e-mail release from Hillary Clinton’s secret e-mail server head-on in an interview with the former Secretary of State yesterday on Face the Nation. Hillary responded by attempting to spin, leaving Dickerson unconvinced at best. “As the State Department said just this week,” Hillary replied, “that didn’t happen.” Actually, what the State Department said was that they had no records to show what happened, but … forget it, she’s rolling. Dickerson presses onward:

Hillary tries arguing that “headings are not classification notices,” but classification is noted in headings — and that’s why they would need to be removed in order to move from a secure transmission to nonsecure transmission.

Clearly in this context, “identifying headings” relate to classification levels. If the information was unclassified, this e-mail would have been entirely unnecessary. As I noted earlier, someone as “meticulous” and “careful” as Sullivan would have already known that he didn’t need to have unclassified material transmitted securely in the first place. On top of that, Hillary wanted this information urgently. If it was unclassified, why would it be so urgent, and why couldn’t Hillary or her immediate team simply dig it up for her?

Get all the background from Ed Morrissey at Hot Air.

This section is for comments from tammybruce.com's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Tammy agrees with or endorses any particular comment just because she lets it stand.
6 Comments | Leave a comment
  1. dennisl59 says:

    This purported human being cannot ‘lawyer-talk’ her way of this situation.

    Her ‘husband’ couldn’t(“what the meaning of the word ‘is’ is.”), and she can’t either.

    posted 1/11 846am Texas[Orange Pantsuit]Time

  2. Alain41 says:

    As I understand it, Hillary is saying that it depends on the classification of classification in regards to whether emails on her server were classified. The answer to that assertion is, of course, classified.

    I see that Friends of Bill have trotted out a former admin. official to say that, He (Bill) had no sexual relations alongside that woman (izing pedophile, Jeffrey Epstein).

    New century, same Clinton playbook. And Dems say that Trump and Cruz want to turn back the clock. Project we Much.

  3. dennisl59 says:

    Here’s another story about the slowly closing walls around this person:

    http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2016/01/11/fbis-clinton-probe-expands-to-public-corruption-track.html?intcmp=hpbt1

    posted 1/11 947am Texas[Lawyer Up Hillary]Time

  4. rosebud2186 says:

    Hillary looks like 10 miles of bad road here…..campaigning is taking it’s toll on her.

  5. deaves1 says:

    LOL. She actually used the words, “there’s no there there.”

  6. dennisl59 says:

    Here’s a story about the F.B.I. slowly but surely closing in on the liar:

    http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2016/01/11/report-fbi-investigation-of-hillary-clinton-expands/

    Not looking good for you, ‘Madam’ Secretary…

    posted 1/11 927pm Texas[Watch Her Plead the 5th]Time

You must be logged in to post a comment.