hillary-guns-1

“This is great” ? An innocent teen is murdered, but this is “great” for Queen Hillary’s agenda?

These are people are lower than pond scum.

With apologies to pond scum, everywhere.

Via BizPac Review.

Newly released emails from Wikileaks show Hillary Clinton staffers debating how they can best use the death of a black man to further their agenda….

The team began discussing an article published in “The Guardian” where the mother of Jordan Davis, a black teenager murdered by a white man for playing music loud, called the killing a “legal lynching” despite the fact that the murderer, Michael David Dunn, was convicted and sentenced to life in prison.

“You know where I stand on this. It can be racially motivated and gun violence should still very much be part of the discussion,” Clinton policy advisor Corey Ciorciari wrote in the Jan. 2016 email. “Even more so here given that Jordan’s mom is one of the leading gun violence prevention proponents in the country.”

“This is great,” she wrote. “….

hillary-staff-email

This section is for comments from tammybruce.com's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Tammy agrees with or endorses any particular comment just because she lets it stand.
3 Comments | Leave a comment
  1. IloiloKano says:

    Dear Lord! How do human beings get so evil, and why can’t they see that they are indeed EVIL?

    • Maynard says:

      Your second question is the vital one. With very few exceptions, nobody regards themselves as a monster. To the contrary, these people regard themselves as fighting the good fight. But they become so deeply immersed in their mission, and so entirely surrounded by people that think exactly the same thing, that everything else becomes an insignificant detail. In this example, they cheer death when they see it being useful to their cause.

      Tammy describes her own early immersion into the culture of hate in her book, “The Death of Right and Wrong.”

  2. Alain41 says:

    Recall the Left saying that Kate Steinle shouldn’t be used for political purposes. NYT wrote an editorial on that. Will NYT write an editorial here? Rhetorical question.

You must be logged in to post a comment.