USMC Study: Women in Combat Hurt Retention

by aardvark on February 16, 2013
USMC Study: Women in Combat Hurt Retention

See also the link in the article that answers these questions:
What is the cost to military effectiveness of sending women into combat?
What is the cost to the taxpayer?
What is the cost to young women themselves?

This section is for comments from tammybruce.com's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Tammy agrees with or endorses any particular comment just because she lets it stand.
3 Comments | Leave a comment
  1. TX Soldier254 says:
    February 16, 2013 at 20:39

    Aardvark, politically speaking, Never Trust A Liberal Never.

    1). What is the cost to military effectiveness of sending women into combat?

    Men in combat(search & destroy the enemy)units like my son’s unit will bail, meaning ‘get the hell out’ of the service. Last thing they would want is to become crippled for life or loss there life over a liberal experiment.

    2). What is the cost to the taxpayer?

    There should be no additional cost since they shall be treated like the men, period.

    3). What is the cost to young women themselves?

    Any combat injury where a woman bears a child (stomach area I guess) could very well leave a young woman barren for life. Not to mention all of the disease she will encounter being filthy (dirty) for weeks without a shower, and no, drinkable water in combat is used to drink water.

    *Again, Never Trust A Liberal*

You must be logged in to post a comment.