Hillary has announced she wants to create, with your tax dollars, a ‘Public Service’ Indoctrination School. Who can blame her? With the leftist takeover of the public school system, from kindergarten through the academy, we are now turning out functionally illiterate, fully indoctrinated little leftists. Half of college graduates may not understand the average newspaper editorial or be able to navigate a street map, but boy, they sure know that America is bad and Republicans are evil.

Hillary now wants that same success rate for ‘public servants.’ You know, everyone who wants to be in government as staff or even elected to office will have to be ‘educated’ by one of her government’s fully-funded ‘schools’ of Correct Thought and Progressive Politics. Let’s see if this public genuflect to Marxist theory is noticed by anyone else:

Clinton: Create Public Service Academy

Presidential candidate Hillary Rodham Clinton told college Democrats on Saturday she would create a national academy to train public servants.

“I’m going to be asking a new generation to serve,” she said. “I think just like our military academies, we need to give a totally all-paid education to young men and women who will serve their country in a public service position.” […]

An older woman carrying a sign that said “She doesn’t care, all she wants is the power” yelled at Clinton while the New York senator was speaking in a ballroom on the University of South Carolina campus. Students attending the College Democrats of America convention shouted down the woman down and pushed her from the room.

It looks like those College Democrats have learned their lesson in “Silencing and Removing Incorrect Thinking Dissenters.” Here’s to Progressive Feminism in action! We certainly can’t have older women speaking their mind, now can we? Especially when it just might expose Hillary Clinton for what she really is.

This section is for comments from tammybruce.com's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Tammy agrees with or endorses any particular comment just because she lets it stand.
8 Comments | Leave a comment
  1. ussjimmycarter says:

    It takes a village! And thanks to our current President and his cronies, I’m very afraid that this woman is going to be our next POTUS! She may be pulling a fast one on America now posing as a centrist but once she takes over with Pelosi and Reid at her command…yikes! I will expect orders to report to a “re-education camp” for conservatives…

  2. Dave J says:

    What a typically idiotic and self-important idea on her part. The French have had this for ages: it’s called l’Ecole Nationale d’Adminstration (ENA), and the “Enarques” it turns out are uniformly self-righteous and corrupt: Jacques Chirac being only the most infamous. Nicholas Sarkozy actually campaigned on his NOT being an Enarque.

  3. ltlme says:

    Good lord, I hate to think what could come next. I suppose that with a school geared for training public servants, they’ll have to offer a semester of how to sell one’s soul. Perhaps the school could have uniforms which would include students having to wear wool over their eyes.

  4. joeblough says:

    Orwell was an optimist.

  5. Asch says:

    Tammy,

    While I appreciate the publicity that you have brought to the U.S. Public Service Academy, I must disagree with your assessment of the idea. I understand that you may not trust Sen. Clinton and thus you are concerned about the Academy idea, but I urge you to keep an open mind about it until you can learn more.

    There is a movement to build the Academy that extends far beyond Sen. Clinton or her campaign. Sen. Clinton has co-sponsored the Senate legislation, but we have bipartisan support — folks like Sen. Kay Bailey Hutchison and Rep. Tom Davis, as well as many military leaders (including the last three superintendents of West Point) are also behind the bill. They certainly are not interested in building a school for left-wing indoctrination, and neither are we.

    This is not a Democratic idea, nor is it a Republican idea. It is an American idea. It promises to revitalize our public sector by developing stronger leadership. Bashing government, mocking public servants, and “starving the beast” have failed to stanch the growth of government in the past generation, and they certainly have not improved government services. Surely we should try something new, something that promises to change government by changing the level of expectation and the culture of its leadership.

    Why should this idea appeal to conservatives? For a number of reasons:
    1) The Academy will make government better, not bigger.

    2) The Academy will focus on character, leadership development, and patriotic service.

    3) The Academy will challenge American higher education to do more to encourage a sense of duty and civic obligation.

    Ironically, our strongest opposition to date generally has come from liberals in higher education who think they already do a fine job of preparing our public leaders. Perhaps you agree with them. We think America deserves better.

    I encourage you and your readers to find out more about the movement to build the Public Service Academy by visiting:
    http://www.uspublicserviceacademy.org.

    Thanks,
    Chris Myers Asch

  6. Dave J says:

    ASCH, with all due respect, you are trying to create a need where there is none.

  7. ussjimmycarter says:

    ASCH, any “Academy” will need to teach a set of values. Whose? is government the answer to our problems? We conservatives don’t think so! Is being for limited government, low taxes, a strong national defense patriotic? Will these views be acceptable in the “Academy”? Or will the Academy teach big government, high taxes, globalism, support for the UN, gun control, humanism over faith in God etc.? We conservatives are very skeptical of any such enterprise and the content!

  8. mrfixit says:

    When I heard her say this, I thought oh great, a RED BRIGADE! Maybe they will wear MAO Jackets, or perhaps Brown Shirts. They could call them the Clinton Youth. (Clinton Jugen?). Wow. One party rule is going to be rough, not that we’re not there already in the current congressional spirit.

You must be logged in to post a comment.