When a terrorist group and the American president agree, you know something is very, very wrong.  Oh, there is a difference–Hamas at least has the conviction of their initial remarks and won’t ‘walk-back’ their comments.

Hamas nod for Ground Zero mosque

A leader of the Hamas terror group yesterday jumped into the emotional debate on the plan to construct a mosque near Ground Zero — insisting Muslims “have to build” it there.

“We have to build everywhere,” said Mahmoud al-Zahar, a co-founder of Hamas and the organization’s chief on the Gaza Strip…Hamas, he added, “is representing the vast majority of the Arabic and Islamic world — especially the Islamic side.” Sen. Chuck Schumer (D-NY), who so far has not taken a position on the mosque, dismissed the endorsement…

Despite his outspoken opposition to the building of a mosque so close to Ground Zero, Rep. Peter King (R-LI) said only, “I don’t respond to Hamas.”

Mayor Bloomberg, a strong supporter of the plan, declined comment through a spokesman.

Feisal Abdul Rauf, the imam behind the proposed mosque, and two other leaders of the plan who previously had commented extensively, were silent yesterday. They did not respond to The Post’s phone calls or e-mails about the Hamas endorsement.

Hamas first came up in the mosque debate earlier this summer when Abdul Rauf refused to describe the group as a terrorist organization — despite the State Department listing that identifies it as such.

Tom Brown, a chief opponent of the mosque, said: “This is what we’ve been saying . . . Imam Rauf is a radical Muslim who will not call Hamas a terror group.”

A retired firefighter who was a first responder on 9/11, Brown lost 100 of his FDNY friends at the Twin Towers. “How much evidence do we need that this guy is a radical Muslim?” he asked. “If Rauf really were a bridge builder and an interfaith guy and all the things he professes to be, he wouldn’t be doing this to people.”

Abdul Rauf raised eyebrows last week when he departed on a State Department-sponsored goodwill mission to the Middle East, despite concerns that the trip may be helping him with the mosque’s $100 million fund-raising goal.

The Obama administration insisted the trip, reportedly with stops in Saudi Arabia, Dubai, Abu Dhabi, Bahrain and Qatar, was strictly to improve understanding about Muslim communities in the United States.

But a London-based Arabic-language newspaper that interviewed Abdul Rauf reported that he said he would also collect money from Muslim and Arab nations around the world — raising the possibility that the American government is helping him build contacts in oil-rich states.

This section is for comments from tammybruce.com's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Tammy agrees with or endorses any particular comment just because she lets it stand.
6 Comments | Leave a comment
  1. franknitti says:

    Mayor Bloomberg and Senator Schumer should both be tied up and flayed alive. Bloomberg for appeasing terrorist groups and Schumer for being too gutless to take a stand against the proposed mosque for fear that other liberal scumbags won’t invite him to anymore cocktail parties.

  2. Palin2012 says:

    Can we get Obama to wear one of those masks when he goes on TV? – the gloves too!

  3. MACVEL says:

    Your pic sows members of the medical death panels.

  4. Lamplighter says:

    If the people behind building the mosque had any decency, which they don’t, they wouldn’t have even considered building it there. They certainly wouldn’t have pursued it this long.

    This isn’t about decency, of course. It’s about thumb-nosing.

    They have the right to build it, concerned citizens have the right to protest.

    Is anyone really surprised that Obama took the “stand” that he did?

  5. M_Miles says:

    According to the following article and link on this comment, Obama denied 9/11 vicitms the right to sue the people that financed the 9/11 attack?! . . .

    On May 29 – just five days before President Obama made his first state visit to Saudi Arabia – Solicitor General Elena Kagan filed a brief arguing that it would be “unwarranted” for the Supreme Court to hear cases brought by the families against five of Saudi King Abdullah’s closest relatives for financing the attacks. The group, named the 9/11 Families United to Bankrupt Terrorism, charges that “five Saudi princes knowingly and intentionally provided financial support to al Qaeda waging war on America.”

    Read more at: http://www.investigativeproject.org/1059/9-11-families-obama-favors-saudi-terror

You must be logged in to post a comment.