Poor Joy Behar will not be happy, after exploding in ecstasy over news of the Flynn guilty plea.

Ditto for Maxine Waters.

Via Breitbart.

On Saturday’s broadcast of the Fox News Channel’s “Fox & Friends,” Harvard Law Professor Alan Dershowitz argued that former Trump National Security Adviser Michael Flynn’s guilty plea is a “show of weakness” for Special Counsel Robert Mueller.

Dershowitz said, “Well, the last thing any prosecutor wants to do is to have to indict his primary witness for lying. Because if you indict your witness for lying, it really means he’s not useful as a witness, he has no credibility. I’m sure the prosecutor was trying to indict him for some scheme or conspiracy that involved other people in the White House, but there is nothing there, and he had to, finally come down and indict him for lying, which makes him a useless witness. So, this is not a show of strength by the prosecutor. It’s a show of weakness. It’s a show that they really have nothing on anybody above of Flynn and that Flynn made the terrible mistake about lying about something he could have told truth about. Because the two things he lied about were perfectly lawful and perfectly proper for somebody to do during the transition. And so, I think it really reflects a weakness, not a strength in Mueller’s prosecution….

This section is for comments from tammybruce.com's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Tammy agrees with or endorses any particular comment just because she lets it stand.
2 Comments | Leave a comment
  1. MACVEL says:

    I received notification from Wash Times that Warner believes Comey when he said Trump tried to stop him from investigating Flynn. Not surprising, but it may be desperation.

  2. Maynard says:

    Is it appropriate to contrast this low-level indictment against Obama’s Justice handing out immunity to everyone for no justifiable reason (after they refused to testify, citing the 5th) and then not pursuing the higher-ups? My sense was that the criminality in the Obama Admin. was blatant and went higher up the food chain, and the corruption in Justice was overt and blatant, whereas here they’re just grasping at straws. But we’re all subject to what they call “confirmation bias”.

You must be logged in to post a comment.