The so-called “paper of record” lied to push their “progressive” agenda?

Color me not shocked.

Via Townhall.

President Trump should probably call off the hunt for the “senior official in the…administration” who the New York Times is claiming wrote a damning op-ed for the newspaper.

Apparently the “senior official” claims to be part of a group of White House staff trying to thwart the president’s agenda from within. He also claims they seriously considered trying to depose the president using the 25th amendment of the Constitution.

Serious stuff. But President Trump should relax and remember it is the New York Times after all. The paper has a scandalous history of lying about the seniority of officials it quotes anonymously – especially when that source parrots their agenda.

A few years back they were caught red-handed deceiving their readers in such a way.

In a lengthy anti-fracking article they claimed that senior industry experts and insiders believed the industry to be little more than a “Ponzi scheme” … “set up for failure”.

They even had the emails from a series of senior insiders where these doubts were expressed….

Well unfortunately for the New York Times, the emails were from the Energy Information Agency – a government organization – so this meant Senate investigators were able to find the original emails and work out the identity of all these different senior experts. It turns out the federal analyst, the energy analyst and the officer turned out to be the same person who was actually an intern when he wrote the first email and in an entry level position when he wrote the other comments. Yes, that’s right, the “Paper of Record” misrepresented an intern/junior employee as a senior official to push an agenda….

Rush Limbaugh: N.Y. Times possibly ‘made up’ anti-Trump op-ed with ‘composite series of opinions’

This section is for comments from's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Tammy agrees with or endorses any particular comment just because she lets it stand.
1 Comment | Leave a comment
  1. Alain41 says:

    NYT ombudsman, Arthur Brisbane, at the time of the anti-fracking articles criticized the NYT for sloppy journalism (Not his words). He was/is the grandson of Arthur Brisbane, who was the foremost editor of the early 20th century. There is a memorial to him in Central Park. He also advised Thomas Edison, Henry Ford, and J.D. Rockefeller on public relations. No ombudsman now.

You must be logged in to post a comment.