AScannerDarkly.jpg

Maynard goes to the movies

This weekend I caught the creepy, dystopian A Scanner Darkly (and they’ve got a MySpace page and of course an IMDB entry as well). I’m going to recommend it most highly to myself, but any of you people who aren’t me (and I assume there are a couple of you) may be less enthusiastic. The story upon which the film is based was written by the (deceased) sci-fi author Philip K. Dick, whose tales draw the reader into worlds of delusions and paranoia. This represents a state of mind that some do not regard as wholesome entertainment; I can’t imagine why not, but people who feel that way should skip the film and read no further. Brooding pseudointellectuals and sci-fi mavens may be intrigued, along with anyone who has melted his or her mind and lived to tell the tale.

This is not a happy story, nor a clear one. Some might read into it a political metaphor (and I have some reason to believe the filmmakers view it as such), but I see it as a personal struggle, which is why I’m sympathetic. A new drug has hit the streets, “Substance D”, and the police have recruited ordinary citizen Bob Arctor (Keanu Reeves) to spy on his friends, who are suspected of being connected to the chain of distribution. Thus Arctor, himself an addict, is drawn into a double life, with one foot inside the drug culture and the other alongside the authorities. His goal should in essence be simple: Find the source of the drugs and clean up the mess. But the clarity of the ideal somehow isn’t being translated into reality. Indeed, this clarity, which should be within reach, seems to be inexorably slipping away.

I’ve got some ambivalence about my enthusiasm for a film that is itself ambivalent-by-design in an era where there is already too much deliberate obfuscation. I’m certainly concerned, as I often am with “artistic” endeavors, that I’m giving my financial support to people who are morally corrupt and, perhaps with the best of intentions, are aiding and abetting the forces of evil. (There is apparently a philosophical connection to Alex Jones of PrisonPlanet.com, who seems to be something of a paranoid whackjob, as indeed was Philip K. Dick himself. Why is it that people of compelling artistic vision so often suffer from such acute moral myopia in the real world? We’ll have to explore this topic sometime.) Anyway, I feel challenged by this film because I believe we only come to clarity through great struggle, and I see that struggle represented in the events portrayed. It’s a film that “works”, if only you can keep up with it (which is no small trick). I emerged from the screening writhing, but enthused. That’s what I took away, but others will disagree. You have been warned, and may now proceed at your own risk.

Crafted on a rotoscope (meaning that live action was translated into animation), “A Scanner Darkly” has an unusual and surreal aura that’s just a notch offset from real life. Rated “R”, it’s unsuitable for children or immature teens.

This section is for comments from tammybruce.com's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Tammy agrees with or endorses any particular comment just because she lets it stand.
4 Comments | Leave a comment
  1. Mwalimu Daudi says:

    I still have not recovered from the shock I received when I saw the “Kitler” website, so probably I’ll pass on this movie.

  2. aegil says:

    I appreciate getting recommendations like this. One movie which I can re-watch frequently, but which is definitely not suitable for everyone, is “The Night Porter.” While it deals with very disturbing subject matter–a post-World-War-II relationship between a surviving SS concentration camp guard and one of the inmates, some of its aesthetic qualities get me hooked every time. Its music, the Vienna location, the quality of doom in it ,and the exotic look of actors such as Dirk Bogarde and Charlotte Rampling are some of the things I enjoy about it. Some people understandably are offended by “The Night Porter, but that hasn’t stopped my interest in it. Maybe many of us have a fascination for “dark” subject matter which is sometimes unexplainable, other than that we live in a very fallen world.

  3. purrkittykatpurr says:

    There is so little quality coming from Hollywood these days. Sure, there are exceptions, “October Sky,” “Life Is Beautiful,” “Crouching Tiger Hidden Dragon,” are a bit dated now, but they prove that great movies can be made without having to see 7 chapters of the Kama Sutra unfold on a 60×40 ft. screen.

    I don’t pay to see new films, now. Instead I go to the movies houses that feature the truly great films of the Golden Age. It’s more fun and a better spent dime. Hollywood has been so over-the-top for so long now.

    As a side note, when I was a kid my mom took me to see a new film called “The God Father.” Mom covered my eyes with her hand when Sonny was having sex (standing up, and fully clothed) with a girl at the opening wedding seen. I was not allowed to see Sonny get it on, but mom thought nothing of letting me see him get torn to shreds by Tommy Guns in the toll booth!

    I’m ready for my close-up Mr. DeMille…

  4. Craig C says:

    Interesting that Robert Downey Jr is in the film.
    I guess it makes sense, what with his run-ins with the drug police.

You must be logged in to post a comment.