Senate Phone Numbers for Amnesty Bill

by Tammy on May 21, 2007
Posted in: Uncategorized

Listeners on today’s Tammy Radio have notified me that it’s become almost impossible to reach the high-profile amnesty senators like McCain, Graham and Kennedy. Many of you report that faxes aren’t on, emails get bounced back, and phones are not answered. Welcome to the American Senate.

Also, for your reading displeasure, here is the link to the bill itself.

So, time to spread the love. Here is a list of senators who OPPOSE or are LEANING AGAINST the bill. They, too, need encouragement and reinforcement. The following are the Democrats who can be swayed or are already opposed. When you call, ask to confirm their position and then give yours, respectfully always, but especially here because these are the men and women on our side.

Dems Local Office Numbers

WV SENATOR ROBERT C BYRD 304-342-5855
ND SENATOR KENT CONRAD 800-223-4457
ND SENATOR BYRON L DORGAN 701-250-4618
ILLINOIS SENATOR RICHARD J DURBIN 312-353-4952
BARACK OBAMA 312-886-3506
NJ SENATOR ROBERT MENENDEZ 973-645-3030
NEBRASKA SENATOR BEN NELSON 402-391-3411

Here are Repub and Dem Washington, DC office numbers. Bunning is expected to oppose. Encourage him to do so. Remember, all of these people oppose the bill or are leaning to opposing it. encourage and support them.

KY SEN JIM BUNNING 502-582-4941
ND SENATOR BYRON L DORGAN 202-224-2551
IL SENATOR RICHARD J DURBIN 202-224-2152
IL SENATOR BARACK OBAMA 202-224-2854
NJ SENATOR ROBERT MENENDEZ 202-224-4744
NEBRASKA SENATOR BEN NELSON 202-224-6551
ALABAMA SENATOR JEFF SESSIONS 202-224-4124
WY SENATOR CRAIG THOMAS 202-224-6441
KY SENATOR JIM BUNNING 202-224-4343
OK SEN TOM COBURN 202-224-5754
OK SEN JAMES M INHOFE 202-224-4721
TN SENATOR BOB CORKER 202-224-3344
NC SENATOR ELIZABETH DOLE 202-224-6342
OWA SENATOR CHUCK GRASSLEY 202-224-3744

Related Posts

This section is for comments from tammybruce.com's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Tammy agrees with or endorses any particular comment just because she lets it stand.
7 Comments | Leave a comment
  1. Carpediem says:
    May 21, 2007 at 12:00

    Hey Tammy, I have been listening to your show after having been out of town and I am really fired up , thanks for playing the clips of the great Ronald Reagan. Whenever I hear him I miss him that much more and recall what a gem of a man and president we had in him. I have called and e-mailed my Senators Warner and Webb and asked them to do the right thing and vote against this amnesty bill.
    I have also e-mailed the spineless repubs McCain, Spector, Graham, Kyl and Martinez suggesting they change their position on this or face being voted out of a job come next election.
    This is fun, I feel the power. When we work together we can move mountains. I wont bother writing Teddy Kennedy, I’m sure he can’t read the e-mails with the double vision going on.
    Keep the info coming. Teri

  2. pat_s says:
    May 21, 2007 at 12:10

    Here’s the bill in a different format which allows section by section comments.

    truthlaidbear

  3. helpunderdog says:
    May 21, 2007 at 12:11

    The letter Tammy read on the air is a great idea! We should all flood our representatives with faxes, emails, letters, and calls stating that we want to temporarily renounce our citizenship in order to be classified as illegal immigrants. Upon unjoying the generous tax exemption affored illegals, we would all become citizens again, just as it is laid out in the Amnesty Bill.

  4. pat_s says:
    May 21, 2007 at 13:40

    Now even snakes deserve more consideration than the American people.
    Border Fence Seen As Threat to Wildlife


    Environmentalists have spent decades acquiring and preserving 90,000 riverfront acres of Texas scrub and forest and protecting their wildlife. Now they fear the hundreds of miles of border fences will undo their work and kill some land animals by cutting them off from the Rio Grande, the only source of fresh water.

    “The bottom line is the wildlife corridor took us many years to put together,” said Karen Chapman of Environmental Defense. “It represents work, hard work, by a number of federal, state and local agencies and citizens of the Valley. And when we were working to put that wildlife corridor together, nobody was doing it with the thought that someday it was going to be stuck behind a wall.”

  5. Dave J says:
    May 21, 2007 at 17:33

    It’s been suggested elsewhere, and I quite agree, that an excellent opposition tactic here would be to use the Senate Rules to insist that the Clerk read the bill in its entirety on the floor. This is a quasi-filibuster that in some sense is tougher than the real filibuster rule because it requires unanimous consent to stop it, which of course you’ll never get. Of course, a bill is actually entitled to three readings, which in general practice are simply stages in the legislative process (publication in the Journal, amendment, and final passage), but ALL the stops in the book need to be pulled out to kill this thing.

    Remember also that even if it does ultimately pass, it needs to pass both chambers in identical form to ever be presented to the President, and opposition should try to prevent the House and Senate companion bills from ever being reconciled.

  6. N_Campbell says:
    May 21, 2007 at 18:52

    Any advice for those of us that want to try and give Boxer and Feinstein a piece of our minds?

  7. Frankly says:
    May 21, 2007 at 19:19

    So, Tammy… If a March on D.C were to be organized, what are the chances you would be available to speak?

You must be logged in to post a comment.