And the attempt to globalize sharia law marches on. Jordan, which is supposed to be one of the Muslim world’ more reasonable countries, jumps into the Islamist Sharia sewage pit of threats and intimidation with all the rest.
Report: Jordan Charges Dutch Politician With Blasphemy
Dutch politician Geert Wilders was charged by a Jordanian prosecutor Tuesday with blasphemy and contempt of Muslims for making an anti-Koran film, and ordered to stand trial in Jordan, Reuters reported.
The charges came one day after Dutch prosecutors decided they wouldn’t take action against Wilders because he was protected by the right to free speech.
An order was issued to bring Wilders to trial through the Dutch Embassy in Amman, Reuters reported. Wilders’ film “Fitna,” which appeared on the Internet on March 27, linked terror attacks by Muslim extremists to texts from the Koran, Islam’s holy book.
The Organization of the Islamic Conference, a league of 56 Muslim nations, said it was “deeply annoyed” by the Dutch decision, Reuters reported.
Yeah? Well we’re ‘deeply annoyed’ by Islamists murdering innocent people around the world, while Islamist states work to terrorize and silence people through their so-called legal system who dare to discuss it honestly.
Keep in mind the Worldwide Caliphate application here, something we have generally only attributed to Iran as a goal. Jordan is charging a man who is not a Muslim with blasphemy according to Muslim rules. That is the key in the Worldwide Caliphate–Islamist stone-age rules apply to everyone, regardless of faith. While the Dutch refusal to prosecute Wilders is laudable considering the pressure they were under, their silence in not condemning the state/legal terrorism of Jordan against Wilders is silly and pathetic.
This story is of particular importance not just to compliment the previous post, but as an example of how Islamist nations prove themselves in league with international terrorism. Let’s be honest here, if countries like Jordan and Saudi Arabia were truly appalled by what Islamist terrorists were doing and not supportive of their horrific acts, they would be charging with blasphemy Islamists who advocate terrorism. They do not. Instead, they charge, and attempt to intimidate and silence a man who simply chronicled recorded, fact-based acts of terrorism done in the name of Islam and “Allah.”
Here is Wilders’ short film which has so upset Islamists. When you watch it you will know why The Organization of the Islamic Conference and Islamists everywhere are desperate to keep you from seeing this. They had done such a good job intimidating the West into not recognizing or naming the enemy. Wilders’ dares to remind us. Be forewarned, there are disturbing images in this film, as one expects when the acts of our enemy are detailed.
And these freaks dare to complain about a puppy!
Related Links:
Earlier blog notes of Feb. 28, 2008 and March 30, 2008.
If the attempt to bring Wilders to trial in Jordan flops, I hear that the Canadian Human Rights Commission is available for hire.
Our supposed ally, King Abdullah of would-be “moderate,” “secular,” “modern” Jordan, needs to put this shit down immediately if he wants to continue to regard us an ally. Otherwise, it should be treated as an act of war against the Netherlands and, as such, an act of war against NATO, including the US.
As arguably the senior and most direct descendant of Mohammed, Abdullah and the Hashemite family actually have a better claim to Mecca and Medina than the upstart desert barbarian House of Saud who drove them out in the 20’s. King Hussein, Abdullah’s father, really was a US ally (except for that whole supporting Saddam in the Gulf War thing) and mercilessly crushed both anything resembling moves toward Iranian-style theocratic movements in Jordan as well as PLO operations when Arafat had temporarily moved there. I’ve long advocated the breakup of Saudi Arabia: driving the Saudis out of the Hejaz and giving that to Jordan, breaking up the opposite shore among Kuwait, Qatar and the UAE, and driving the Sauds back to the Empty Quarter where they belong, to take their Wahhabi BS with them (but not the oil wells). That and restoring a Hashemite monarch to the throne of Iraq if the Iraqis opt for it. All that could be theirs with our willing help, IF they don’t put up with crap like this.
blas·phe·my
n. pl. blas·phe·mies
1.
a. A contemptuous or profane act, utterance, or writing concerning God or a sacred entity.
b. The act of claiming for oneself the attributes and rights of God.
2. An irreverent or impious act, attitude, or utterance in regard to something considered inviolable or sacrosanct.
We’re all blasphemous to one God or another. Heck, that last sentence was blasphemous. But blasphemy is largely a sin against God and He/She doesn’t need us to pass sentence and execute judgment! Of course I’m working from largely a Christian perspective where it is believed that vengeance for violations belongs to the Lord … perhaps judgment and retribution are subcontracted out by the God of Islam.
Naturally, to even *think* that, let alone say it is clearly blasphemy!
Oh well.
Didn’t Thomas Jefferson and John Adams deal with these guys already and decide that you have to kick their ass instead of paying tribute to them? Why are we still scratching our heads about who they are, their agenda and how to deal with them? This is all very boring stuff. Religion of peace my butt. We all know the truth. Can someone just say it? Are we so far gone that we can’t call junk junk.
What is a “moderate” Muslim? As far as I can tell, radical Muslims want to kill infidels themselves, while moderate Muslims want Muslim governments to kill infidels.