(via BigFurHat at iotw)
Please visit the TAM Podcasts page for your exclusive media 🙂 If you aren’t a member of the Tammy Army, please join today! And if you have just joined, here are some instructions. To access today’s show just go to the TAM Podcasts page. There you will find today’s show and the whole archive, including podcasts and netcasts. You must be signed in here at the blog to access the players. Also visit the “Members” subpage listed just above the banner. There you will get special TAM instructions and instructions on how to download the podcasts via iTunes.
Palin-axe v. Palin-istas. In selection of a weapon-it seems she would go for an axe versus an “ista” whatever that is. Mittni-istas for Romney fans? How about Newt-t’istas? Hucksti-istas? T-paw-istas or maybe Pawlentistas? PalinAXE seems fitting – uh, with a velvet glove but of course.
I prefer Backers, as in we have Sarah’s back. Palin Backers, Sarah Backers, take your pick if you need to differentiate between Palin and all the others. Backers is short and sweet, reminiscent of Sarah’s usual style. It doesn’t come the fashion hit that comes off -istas or the unnecessarily contfrontational -axe suggestion.
I believe it was intended to be Palin-acs, not -axe, but I don’t like either one. Palin Backers is better, but what about Palin-ites, in honor of the Reagan-ites?
Palinacts; as in activism, you know Tea Party Activists? It doesn’t copy off anyone; blazes a new trail, you know Rogue and all that. You guys are too smart for me. “Backers” Nice! Simple and to the point! Whatever…it doesn’t matter. Simply Sarah – and she will likely be confrontational when necessary whether she wants to or not. It’s kinda the point: having to be so, to save the country. Being non-confrontational doesn’t seem to be working so much. If you want non-confrontational elect Huckabee, or a potato.