Please visit the TAM Podcasts page for your exclusive media 🙂 If you aren’t a member of the Tammy Army, please join today! And if you have just joined, here are some instructions. In the Podcasts page you will find today’s show and the whole archive, including podcasts and netcasts. You must be signed in here at the blog to access the players. Also scroll over the “Members” subpage listed just above the banner. There you will get special TAM information and instructions on how to download the podcasts via iTunes, plus other perks.

This section is for comments from tammybruce.com's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Tammy agrees with or endorses any particular comment just because she lets it stand.
8 Comments | Leave a comment
  1. […] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Tammy Bruce and Stanley Blanchard, Linda Zumpano. Linda Zumpano said: RT @HeyTammyBruce: Today’s Tammy Radio Podcast Has Posted http://bit.ly/aIWTEk #tbrs […]

  2. trevy says:

    Toward the end of next January, I’m flying to Minneapolis to see family.

    Before I fly, I’ll eat a heaping bowl of baked beans with onions and jalepeno peppers. Then, if that Touching Sensitive Areas agent tries to get fresh with me, BOY!, will I let him HAVE IT!

  3. Chuck says:

    Great interview with Chris Barron today, Tammy.

  4. Artgal says:

    Part of the reason TSA/DHS is so adamant about the body scanner/feely thing is due to the fact they know we don’t like it. There is a psychology to what they are doing; it’s the perpetrator exerting power over their victim. It’s meant to dehumanize as much as it is to desensitize us, and it’s sickening to know that federal perpetrators are basically getting off on this new level of power they’ve been given (not by us…). It’s as though the more we protest, the more power they take over us.

    So what if we really screwed up their world? Why don’t we cause a scene during holiday travel and start a tea party campaign called ‘Holiday Cheer Special: Frequent Flyer Foreplay’? We would opt out of the naked machine, of course, but then proceed with a confident, jolly spirit to be felt up. Don’t get me wrong – I’m not saying we aquiesce AT ALL! But if we opt out of the machine, we’re going to be touched. We may as well cause a scene so THEY are publicly humiliated while we exhibit confidence.

    Honestly, what if guys asked the TSA, ‘Wanna see what Santa’s got for you?’ What if us ladies moaned a little and said, ‘That’s it, Baby! Right there!’ when the TSA goddess runs her hands here and there? What if we just all acted like Meg Ryan in the scene I know you’re familiar with from ‘When Harry Met Sally?’ Maybe Napolitano could learn a thing or two.

    It’s just a thought, but if we are not successful in stopping this crap altogether we have to at least embarrass those who dare stick their effing paws on us. The irony in this is that if we act as though we are enjoying frequent flyer foreplay, the TSA perverts will no doubt file a sexual harassment suit against us.

  5. Mrs. Malcontent says:

    They are going to have to buy me dinner first!

  6. thierry says:

    it’s called punishment for the elections- the aggressive pat downs. these are the things narcissistic sociopaths do to those who cross them.

    in nazi germany, they started in on the jews by nipping away at rights( along with of course completly illegal thug activity, unpunished)- to the point where there would be a new anti-jew law every week. they did things that are as absurd as prohibiting jews from owning pets. it was all in the name of ‘ security’ and protecting germans from their natural enemies- like a jew owning a toy poodle was a threat to any one.

    think of it as another form of government rape. the serfs do not have the right to say “no”. the serf’s lot is to submit. the republicants better wake up and start attacking and aggressively stopping this sort of thing because it will not end on its own. it’s one thing for individuals to go rogue from the status quo. it’s quite another when a government goes rogue against the rule of law and the constitution.

    unreasonable search and seizure without a warrant, with no reasonable suspicion on the part of the law officer. oh , wait, these aren’t sworn officers of the law. done by someone who is not an officer of the law- that’s called assault and in some cases sexual battery. time to call the real police and lawyer up.

    ( i just want it noted for the record that i had trouble typing this because a tortie was demanding an ‘ aggressive pat down’ while perched on the keyboard.)

You must be logged in to post a comment.