Welcome to the premiere of our “Letters from Bellevue” section of Tammy Blog. Today’s winner:

Freak.

Thursday, April 9, 2009 10:31 AM
From:
“Christopher Conard”

To:
[email protected]

Calling the President trash, real classy. I saw your little spiel on O’Reilly about the Eminem video. You were calling for people to hate on Michelle Obama. The difference between her and Palin is that Michelle is a sensitive, intelligent, thoroughly independent woman, and the world loves her. Sarah Palin is a dumb slut. Get the picture? Or are you too much of a clown?

So let’s see here, and I’m the “hater”? Hmm.

Oh, just for fun, since I’m accused of encouraging people to “hate on” Mrs. Urkel, here’s the segment also posted in the original note about my appearance.

This section is for comments from tammybruce.com's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Tammy agrees with or endorses any particular comment just because she lets it stand.
28 Comments | Leave a comment
  1. It is my contention that Eminem has a crush on Governor Palin. (as repugnant as that may seem to us)
    Remember his hate raps about his mother? This rap is how he expresses his weird sense of affection.
    Poor “star” has exposed his fantasy about the Governor.
    He really does not know any better.

  2. CinderellaMan says:

    You ( and Bill ) were point-on in your reporting last night.

    Eminem’s video was really over the line. I guess that is entertainment to some, unfortunately.

    As for Christopher Conard, maybe he didn’t follow the election… Sarah Palin ran for VP, not First Lady. Just a prime example of a hyperpartisan leftwing rant. I suppose some people consider advocating and regurgitating the radical teachings of Saul Alinsky as commendable for Michelle Obama. I say it’s not befitting a First Lady, or anyone in close association with the leader of free world.

  3. RobK says:

    I’m sure the uneducated “Media Doesn’t Matters” goofball, who e-mailed you saying you were speaking about Mrs. Urkel, will read this. So, did the idiot even listen to what you said and realize it wasn’t about Mrs. Urkel, it was about Sarah Palin? Who cares about Mrs. Urkel?

  4. Tamala says:

    I would encourage the delusional Mr. Conrad to break free from the left wing hate machine. There are other ways to earn a paycheck. Can you say “Would you like fries with that?”

  5. Shawmut says:

    The O’Reilly visit was perfectly reasonable. The obvious really hurts some people.
    When a member of a clique acts out, speaks out or dribbles out, outrageously, only to prove he can, he can be assured of support from lesser people who live vicariously through his behavior. (The opnly lives they have are those that are lived vicariously.)
    Let’s realize that lesser person’s need; his desparation to be. Perhaps, only now, he is awakening to the fact that his station is that of a would-be who landed on the might-have-been spot.
    Yet, we can listen to or watch a civil Tammy provide reasonably decent points in disccussion.

  6. laughingatpinheads says:

    “Sarah Palin is a dumb slut”…A dumb slut? What has Sarah Palin ever done to deserve this type of label? It’s outrageous and this “Conard” deserves a good hard smack in the head as a reply.

  7. LongviewCyclist says:

    Palin has recently been disappointing, agreeing that there should be a new election for so-and-so.

    But, to call her a dumb slut is clearly misogynist. Doesn’t matter if it’s a man or a woman who makes the statement.

    You gotta love liberals. They tell on themselves at every turn!

    😀

  8. mustang says:

    They are very afraid of Gov. Palin, she is not a Washington insider and has no ties to the washington political establishment and she draws huge crowds where ever she goes. She must be destroyed.
    I think this is only the tip of the iceberg, you will see more of this in the coming year.
    I look at her as Reagan in a skirt and heels. go girl!

  9. KWH says:

    “Palin has recently been disappointing, agreeing that there should be a new election for so-and-so.”

    Do you understand why she feels this way? You do realize (and the law backed him up) he was INTENTIONALLY vilified so he would lose his seat. The same prosecutors are now themselves under investigation.
    Had this not happened, he would have kept his seat. One less obamatronic robot in the senate.

  10. Arthur Wang says:

    Gee Christopher, that was quite a tirade. Folks like you always have a bit of trouble with the English language so lets take it one step at a time with your vocabulary.

    First Governor Palin

    Dumb: Unable to speak but now usually defined as a synonym for stupid. Sara Palin went from Housewife to Governor of Alaska in a remarkably short time with almost no support from the Alaska Republican machine. Dumb, I don’t think so.

    Slut: A sexually promiscous woman. Nope sure dosen’t relate to Governor Palin. That’s one that even her harshest detractors haven’t used.

    Now Ms. Obama.

    Independent: Usually ascribed to people that are able to accomplish their ends without support. Dosen’t sound like Mrs. Obama to me. She may be a bright woman but dosen’t seem to have accomplished a whole lot on her own. Now that I think of it independent is a better adjective for Sara Palin

  11. imgoodthnks says:

    so sad to see the left becomes sooo narrow minded they used to be just haters, now they are narrow minded-haters! Go tammy!!

  12. i get drunk with ted kennedy says:

    Conard

    The democrats have been trying to use that they are the smart ones eversince adlai stevenson ran against Dwight Eisenhower.

    And you call the democrats smart? Well the science of microbiology proves that the embryo’s DNA is not the DNA of bacteria or viruses as the democratic party would have everyone believe. Or did the democratic party fail to check out what biological science empirically proves – thus casting doubts of your intellectual superiority.

    Sarah Palin is indeed a very smart lady and a lady of kindness and gentleness – two qualities that are highly valued in a human being.

  13. Dave J says:

    “Had this not happened, he would have kept his seat. One less obamatronic robot in the senate.”

    It’s marginal. Stevens was, and remains, a corrupt sleaze and one of the biggest kings of pork in the history of the Senate. Begich has no seniority, so while’s he’s an Obamabot, he’s also a powerless nobody.

  14. LongviewCyclist says:

    KWH, it was a fair election. So, yeah. She was disappointing.

  15. KWH says:

    “It’s marginal. Stevens was, and remains, a corrupt sleaze”
    Odd…..has he been as bad as you say, no way the prosecutors should/could have botched it this bad.
    That’s like a PROVEN murder’s prosecutor adding false jay walking charges and piling on traffic tickets and ignoring the PROVEN murder charges.
    Was he perfect?…..he is a politician after all…..
    “it was a fair election”
    Was it? Can you prove that statement? have you seen the smear campaign that was run non stop against him? So much corruption in our political system that statement is really laughable. If you believe it was fair what was done to him or Palin, more power to ya!

  16. KWH says:

    Let me do a quick Google for ya. “Corrupt” Stevens still nearly won reelection, even with all the smears.

    Mark Begich Dem. 150,728 47.9%
    Ted Stevens Rep. 147,004 46.7 Incumbent
    Just amazing how all these Dems are tax cheats and yet Stevens gets the unlubed shaft, because he’s a Rep. Saint? Oh hell no but the same standards need to apply to everyone.

    “In essence, the government tricked the jury into returning a tainted verdict against the senator based on false evidence,” Sullivan and Cary said in a lengthy statement.
    Reporting from Washington — The Justice Department has moved to drop all charges against former Sen. Ted Stevens, the 85-year-old Alaska Republican convicted of lying on Senate financial disclosure forms to conceal hundreds of thousands of dollars in gifts and home renovations from a businessman. In a case criticized by the federal trial judge for prosecutorial missteps, Atty. Gen. Eric H. Holder Jr. has concluded that the conduct in the former senator’s trial warrants not only dropping the charges against Stevens but also a full review of the Justice Department’s handling of the case.
    The above taken from the LA Times.

    Bottom line here is: If they can do this to a “sleaze” like Stevens, they can do it to ANY of us.

  17. artgal says:

    Looks as though Christopher Conard has already been infected by the Eminem video further confirming your point, Tammy. Why else would he come to the delusional, sexist and disgusting conclusion he had on Gov. Palin? Christopher is a spoon-fed robot.

    Also delusional was Christopher’s observation that Michelle Obama is somehow ‘thoroughly independent’ (give us proof, Buddy-rough) or ‘sensitive’ – I guess if you like rubbing sandpaper against your skin, Chris. I don’t call being a radical who fell for the racist-Marxist rhetoric of her college days and has held onto it all her adult life as at all independent or intelligent.

    And Chris: Perhaps you were referring to your buddie’s video ‘hating’ on someone. Tammy never encouraged the audience to hate on Michelle – as you so eloquently put it. But your big time hero, Eminem, sure put out the hate on Palin, didn’t he? Trashing Palin doesn’t bother you at all, and it’s obvious the only way a pudf**k like Eminem can get a buck is to promote disrespect, sexism and even harm toward women & have an idiot as yourself buy into it. Bet that made you feel like a big tough guy to watch that video 10x’s in a row, didn’t it Chris?

    Chris, I’ll put this in terms even an Eminem fan can understand: you’re a dumbass.

  18. Dave J says:

    KWH, I’m not defending what the prosecutors did here. As a prosecutor myself, my job is to seek justice, not to win convictions by any means, and whenever a prosecutor does otherwise, they bring us all into disrepute and should be punished severely.

    None of that changes my opinion of Ted Stevens. He has been a disgraceful albatross around the neck of the GOP for decades: the Republican version of Bob Byrd. And remember, it’s not what illegal but what’s legal that tends to be most of the real corruption scandal in DC.

  19. PaleoPat says:

    Let’s see here. In the words of the immortal Ted Nugent, a real conservative:

    “what is feminism? Fat broads that don’t get any?”

    I prefer to call them Femin-Nazi’s myself.

    I personally think women ought to be seen and not heard. Yes, I am a Conservative, very much so.

    I also find it ironic, that you support the slaughter of the unborn as well. and yet, claim to be a Conservative.

    Just a thought….

    -Pat

  20. Shawmut says:

    Sometimes it easier to take a Conrad and say to the public:
    “Read or listen; thus defines him.”

  21. LongviewCyclist says:

    “have you seen the smear campaign that was run non stop against him?”

    KWH, that can be said for any number of elections, especially lately. The people believe what they choose to.

    If the prosecutors truly did wrong, then hopefully they will be handled accordingly. (I won’t hold my breath, though.) But as long as the votes are counted and recorded correctly, that’s as fair an election as anyone can hope to have these days. Sorry, but it’s true.

  22. KWH says:

    “But as long as the votes are counted and recorded correctly, that’s as fair an election as anyone can hope to have these days. Sorry, but it’s true.”

    Who is watching the watchers? Have we learned nothing from past elections? Clown Franken will assume his seat shortly because of “fair” counts.

    “As a prosecutor myself”
    Then you should know better. Seems from your posts and your less than low opinion of Stevens would allow false evidence to bring him down. Hey, it’s ok, Stevens was pond scum and needed to be brought down. Doesn’t matter it was done illegally, right? We disposed of another RINO.
    Win by any costs…..indeed.
    If we condone these types of actions for the sake of purging less than desirable s illegally, then we are no better than the scum on the “other side”.
    Come on people, please wake up already!

  23. LongviewCyclist says:

    “Who is watching the watchers? Have we learned nothing from past elections? Clown Franken will assume his seat shortly because of “fair” counts.”

    It’s easy to talk about this stuff. Tell me, what do you propose we do about ‘watching the watchers’? And be realistic. Being childless, *I* might be inclined to hold up a sign all day, and send out 25 handwritten letters the same day. But you know that most folks can’t be bothered, childless or not. The Tea Parties are a very rare exception for many people.

    Getting rid of groups like ACORN is not enough.

  24. KWH says:

    “It’s easy to talk about this stuff. Tell me, what do you propose we do about ‘watching the watchers’?”
    Easy. Ordinary citizens. People like Tammy. People just like you and me speaking up. Letters don’t do squat unless it’s in the tens of thousands and a daily barrage. I for one am not inclined to sit and eat the spoon fed spin but if you want to eat the spin of a ‘fair election”, you can have my share too.
    Getting rid of Acorn isn’t enough, we agree there. Conservatives have been painted as warmongering, pious, Jesus freak fruitcakes wanting our society to return to the medieval ages. Most of us have stood by and let it happen without a peep otherwise. When I hear this comparison, I do speak out.

  25. LongviewCyclist says:

    KWH, ‘speaking up’ is neither here nor there.

    What *specifically* do you suggest?

    Til then, I say that what we have is as fair as we can hope for these days. Accusing me of buying spoonfed spin is ridiculous and unproductive.

  26. KWH says:

    “Accusing me of buying spoonfed spin is ridiculous and unproductive.”
    Truth struck a nerve did it? From your posts on this thread, you seem to be a “me too” or “status quo” person. If you need me or anyone else to “tell you what to do” you are in sad shape. You go ahead, eat the MSM BS sammich, I choose not to. You want specifics? LMAO There are no specifics. One must do what they can, each according to their talents. People like Tammy work hard to bring us the news behind the news, do you demand specifics of her as well? Did you really need me to tell you that? Or were you trying to augment your viewpoint by dismissing me via wanting specifics? Looks to be a page from the liberal hand book and doesn’t work well.
    Geeeez, Koolaid in a paper cup!
    Hey, we just disagree on this particular thread, big deal we all can’t agree on everything. I’m moving on. You can stay here and ask for specifics all ya want. BTW Happy Easter to you and everyone else.

  27. Perry says:

    What is the difference between a boatload of Taliban or other terrorists and a boatload of rappers?

    NOTHING!

    Why is it that men of any race, Caucasian, Hispanic, Asian, African, Indian, etc, cry about how unfair they’ve been treated, but they ALL treat women as nematodes?

  28. LongviewCyclist says:

    KWH, you sound more like a liberal playing dressup to me than anyone who is actually concerned about this country. You know absolutely nothing about me, and you make false accusations. That is exactly how liberals behave. In light of that, I can tell you, we disagree about a hell of a lot more than what’s in this thread.

    I’d call you exactly what you are, but the fact that I’m a Christian, and also have too much respect for the folk who run this website prevent me from using such foul language.

    I know that you’re checking this thread for my response, but don’t worry. You can post more if you like. Unlike you, I really am moving on. You’re a sad person, KWH.

You must be logged in to post a comment.