A post by Maynard
The Sun has reported that a British Muslim PC (“Police Constable”) was excused from guarding the Israeli Embassy after he refused to serve on “moral grounds” due to Israel’s battle with Hezbollah in Lebanon. When news of the incident broke, an inquiry was launched. Most people understand that the police should be discharging their racists rather than assigning them to tasks in which they won’t have to deal with the object of their racism.
Security at the Israeli Embassy is always a matter of concern. In 1994, a Palestinian car bomb injured 19 people and damaged buildings at the site.
A subsequent Jerusalem Post article notes that the Association of Muslim Police is now claiming that the officer requested reassignment out of concern over Lebanese family members. “This is an issue around the welfare of a particular officer,” and was not religiously motivated, AMP declares.
Describing this PC as a “racist” is accurate….sort of. It would be much more accurate to describe him as a terrorist sympathizer. Which, inasmuch as Hizbollah and the 7 July 2005 a**holes who murdered more than fifty tube-riding and bus-riding Londoners are all part of the same anti-Western islamo-Fascist conspiracy, means that this policeman is a traitor.
Is hanging, drawing and quartering still an option under the laws of England?
This guy probably shouldn’t be guarding the Israeli Embassy or any other embassy for that matter. Sounds like he might show up someday wearing the wrong kind of vest.
What I found amusing is the contradictory nature of the police association’s claim. Since the threat to the officer’s family is most definitely religiously motivated.
“Is hanging, drawing and quartering still an option under the laws of England?”
Treason is, technically, the only offense still punishable by death in the UK. Send him to the Tower!