A comment by Maynard

If the phrase “Pyrrhic victory” isn’t part of your vernacular, consider this your lesson of the day.

As far as Imus goes…I’ve never paid him any attention, so I’m not in a position to defend or attack him. If I’ve momentarily tuned him in now and again, he didn’t hold my interest.

However, whatever his merits and demerits, Imus is just another media curmudgeon. He’s not particularly responsible for keeping black people down, and taking him out will not do anything to improve the state of the world. Everybody knows this. The firing is just a war trophy for the Reverends Jackson and Sharpton.

I’ll mention the degeneration of the civil rights establishment, but my words hardly matter. That is to say, when we speak of racial issues, emotions trump reason. The facts condemn Al Sharpton as a reprehensible man with blood on his hands, but his star will nevertheless ascend until people get sick of him. His silly little victory over Imus, which most people regard with scorn, may be the beginning of the end.

Sharpton’s best-known transgression was his role in the Tawana Brawley case in 1987. Brawley was a black woman who fabricated a claim of having been abducted and raped by white men. Sharpton jumped in and named Steven Pagones, a New York prosecutor, as the perpetrator. The whole thing was nonsense, and the liars were eventually exposed and ordered to pay damages. Sharpton never apologized for his slander.

More serious, although less widely known, was Sharpton’s role in fomenting the Crown Heights anti-Jewish riots of 1991, and his incendiary speeches prior to the 1995 attack on a New York store that left seven people dead. A summary from this article:

In 1991, Sharpton spoke at the funeral of a black child in Brooklyn. The Hasidic Jews involved in the traffic accident that took the child’s life, Sharpton preached, were “diamond merchants.” Sharpton then led 400 angry demonstrators through the Jewish neighborhood of Crown Heights, a marcher at his side carrying a sign reading: “The White Man is the Devil.” A Kristallnacht of four nights of rock and bottle throwing at Jewish homes followed. A young Talmudic scholar, Yankel Rosenbaum, was surrounded by thugs yelling “Kill the Jew.” He was stabbed to death, but before dying, identified the man who stabbed him. This young black, apprehended with the bloody knife in his pocket, was found not guilty by a racially mixed jury during the administration of Giuliani’s predecessor, New York’s first black mayor, David Dinkins. Dinkins’ Police Commissioner, Lee Brown, declared that “Sharpton came close to the line of inciting [to riot] but did not actually cross it.”

In 1995 in Harlem, when, during a tenant-landlord dispute, Freddy’s Fashion Mart attempted to evict a black-owned record store, Sharpton organized protests against what he called a “conspiracy” by a “white interloper.” It was, as one of Sharpton’s lieutenants told protesters, a “Jewish department store.” After one demonstration, a protester ran into the store, gunned down several employees, and set it ablaze. Seven, including Hispanics and a black security guard, died. As Boston Herald columnist Don Feder wrote of this carnage, “Don’t fault Sharpton for not being inclusive.”

In short, Sharpton isn’t simply an opportunistic liar and slanderer. He played a significant role in inciting violence and murder. He’s not just a man we disagree with; he is evil.

So how did this despicable man become a power broker? What was he doing addressing the Democratic convention in 2004? Why is he treated as if he were respectable when the facts so clearly condemn him?

As I’ve noted, when it comes to politics in general and racial politics in particular, emotions overwhelm reason. So the facts don’t matter as much as they should. Even so, I’m getting a sense of rising disgust directed at Sharpton and all who have allied themselves with him. We haven’t seen the last of his ugliness, and his core supporters will stick with him forever. But he may have peaked, and his descent may eventually weaken the useless, self-serving machine that the civil rights establishment has degenerated into. One can hope, anyway.

This section is for comments from tammybruce.com's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Tammy agrees with or endorses any particular comment just because she lets it stand.
7 Comments | Leave a comment
  1. SLABBOTT says:

    I hope you are correct but won’t hold my breath. Sharpton and Jackson have been getting away with this stuff for too many years and I fear they will continue. Oh well…they don’t speak for me and I’m not about to let anyone tell me I’m a victim…no matter how hard liberals try these days!

  2. Signal32X says:

    I was watching the news this morning (FOX) and they implied the same thing; however, I am not fully convinced this is in fact a Pyrrhic Victory. I don’t see the “Just Us” brothers seeing this as an expensive opportunity. I think we need more heavy hitters like Michelle Malkin to weed out the double standard. I guess time will tell.

  3. pat_s says:

    Don Imus slinks off scorned, reproached and unemployed while Al Sharpton will be having his ring kissed by political, media and corporate elites. He’s the founder of an activist organization, the National Action Network. NAN’s Ninth Annual Convention is April 18-21. Among others in attendance will be top dog Democrats Bill Clinton, Hillary Clinton, John Edwards, Howard Dean, Joe Biden, Barach Obama, Governor Spitzer of New York; media celebrities Brian Williams of NBC, Soledad O’Brien of CNN, Martin Bashir of ABC; industry and union bigshots from AFL-CIO, Shell Oil, WalMart, Chrysler Corporation.

    Accuracy in Media is upset about Bill O’Reilly showing up as a special guest. Sean Hannity will be there, but he’s debating Sharpton on Race in America in the 21st century.

    Cliff Kincaid of AIM makes this point:

    “How does one explain our media’s blatant hypocrisy in relation to Imus and Sharpton? The answer, quite simply, is fear. They are scared of what Sharpton and his tag-team partner, Jesse Jackson, can do to them. So they cultivate the civil rights agitators in the hope that they will be spared their wrath. After all, they don’t want to suffer the Imus fate.”

  4. Rod says:

    As someone who has observed for several decades the “Civil Rights” movement let me bring up some facts that the MSM/DNC has censored for 50 years.
    The “Civil Rights” movement has been lead by people who supported violence (even though in the 50’s and 60’s they claimed to want “non violent” protests). They were probably, and now are for sure, people opposed to America and American values.

    In the 60’s wherever MLK went there was bloodshed and property damage shortly thereafter. The Willowbrook riots (mislabeled the “Watts Riots” by the MSM?DNC – but in fact the first 2 days of killing and burning took place in Willowbrook; which is near Watts but is not Watts. But who expects the MSM/DNC to report accurately or honestly?) Are a classic case here in Cal. The South LA economy has never recovered from them; despite trillions ($x,xxx,xxx,xxx,xxx) of dollars put into the area by State and Fed govts.

    A similar but much smaller riot took place in Newark NJ after a MLK visit. Also Chicago Ill. Through out the 60’s murder and destruction followed him around the country. Too many occurances to have been coincidences. But never reported by the MSM/DNC.

    Today’s Reverends are not much different. Only more open in their hatred of America and American ideals.

    What they did to Imus was not as significant as what they tried to do to the Duke “rapists”! Imus is going to get a $15,000,000,000 “golden handshake” from Viacom. The poor Duke “rapists” are out $x,xxx,xxx,xxx.. Today’s Reverends are not being held to account and MLK was never either.

  5. SteveOk says:

    The Clinton episode says all you need to know about the right Rev. Jesse Jackson. After Slick had to admit his affair (“non-sexual”) with Monica, thanks to DNA evidence and not any honesty in the Clintons, Jesse Jackson was Slick’s counselor. Later we find out that the “Reverend” was having an affair himself during the same period he was counseling Slick Willey about his affair. The counseling sessions was nothing more that a PR stunt. These guys are nothing more than con-artists. They make the Nigerian scammers look like beginners. Imus and Sharpton together was a very telling moment. Imus went to Sharpton because he feels comfortable around people like himself and knows where they are coming from (the same place he knows). And that a place where snake oil is sold by the truck load.

  6. Pat Berry says:

    Imus is going to get a $15,000,000,000 “golden handshake” from Viacom.

    Viacom is going to give Imus fifteen billion dollars? I don’t think so. Viacom’s net income for all of 2005 was only an eighth of that.

  7. ConnecticutBruce says:

    Thanks for bringing up sharpton’s central role in the Crown Heights POGROM and the Freddy’s incident, which were far worse than Imus’ idiotic and racist comments. Of all people who should NOT sit in judgment of anyone else, the odious sharpton is near the top of the list.

    Your suggestion that this may be a “Pyrrhic” victory is well founded. Because Imus will have a second act and when he gets back on the air, he’s going to be gunning for those who used him and then cast him aside when he became “radioactive.” And while he will no doubt go after sharpton, he will absolutely lash out at the leftist slime like chris matthews, tim russert, david gregory, and the others who were happy to be in his crew when times were good.

    Payback is gonna be a (rhymes with witch) and when Imus is back in the saddle, he will take no prisoners.

You must be logged in to post a comment.