I just can’t believe it, can you? But if they love her so much, you’d think they’d want her back. It is safe to say Mexico sure needs their own Rosa Harriet Parks Tubman who’s really lovin’ the attention and celebrity back in her corrupt chaotic home country. So it’s weird they’re protesting the United States sending one of their own citizens back to them. How odd.
Mexican Senate sides with mom deported from USA
MEXICO CITY (AP) — A Mexican Senate committee passed a measure Wednesday urging President Felipe Calderon to send a diplomatic note to the United States protesting the deportation of an illegal migrant who took refuge in a Chicago church for a year.
The committee also approved a scholarship to help her 8-year-old U.S.-born son, Saul, who is an American citizen and stayed in the United States.
This anchor baby scheme has got to stop. By the way, when is someone going to call what she did the child abuse it was in the first place? Involving a child in a life of crime and hiding out. Lovely.
Americans have got to realize that Mexico is not a friend and not an ally. Mexico is doing everything it can to increase the number of Mexicans living in the United States. To Mexicon, the legality of these measures is irrelevent and the impact on our nation is irrelevent. These are not the actions of a friendly nation. The Mexican government is saying “Our citizens have a right to violate your sovereignty and they are not subject to your laws.” That is the attitude of an enemy, not an ally.
The whole anchor baby issue could be resolved by chasing through the court system the fact that the parents are violating our laws when they enter illegally. A baby born to a parent violating our sovereignty should not be allowed to be declared a citizen.
Isn’t that the whole thing about fruit from the poisonous tree? Doing something illegal (coming into the country breaking the law) should make other activities that are done illegal and there should be NO gain because of the first illegal activity.
Anchor babies; even the term is sickening. It may sound harsh but it is time to simply stop allowing this exception. If you are born here and your mother is not a legal citizen, then neither is the baby. Stop the incentives. End it.
Speaking of anchor babies? Hmm..Although I am not one to gossip, if one looks at the picture of ‘activist mom’, could it be that she was about ready to cast another anchor? Held up in a church, huh? I have no sympathy, no empathy, nothing but pure frustration. Unless this Nation gets serious about dealing forcefully and immediately with the abuses of immigration; it remains a boiling pot about to explode. I hope I am wrong. Yet, I know I am not.
>By the way, when is someone going to call what >she did the child abuse it was in the first >place? Involving a child in a life of crime and >hiding out.
Uh…not to mention child abandonment. I doubt anyone in the way of her taking him with her back to Mexico.
Here in San Francisco, well, you can just imagine the whining… “how can they pull a mother away from her child, blah, blah, blah.” The open borders people are constantly posting on the local paper’s boards decrying the desecration of family values. What a crock. It’s simply despicable what this horrible, evil woman has been doing, using her child as a pawn in her activist games. That poor kid has been in front of more Congressional hearings than big tobacco. Little Saul is just a prop to this awful b**** and her reconquista pals.
I find the posting by SKEPTIC to be so fundamentally perfect in logic and law that I can only scatch my head and say “yeah, me too!” It really is that simple—fruit from the poison tree and unfair gains from illegal activity. Geez, why is that so difficult to convey?
I find the posting by SKEPTIC to be so fundamentally perfect in logic and law that I can only scatch my head and say “yeah, me too!” It really is that simple—fruit from the poison tree and unfair gains from illegal activity. Geez, why is that so difficult to convey?