A comment by Maynard

You may know that the District of Columbia goes essentially unrepresented in Congress. See Wikipedia for details. The Wiki article is full of details and arguments and counterarguments, but the bottom line is the D.C. status is specified in the Constitution.

When I was in public high school, the history book they gave me (and I suspect they’re not teaching it this way these days) explained it this way: Since D.C. was created to be the seat of the Federal government, and the residents were primarily there, directly or indirectly, in service of the Federal government, it would be a conflict of interest for these residents to elect that government. With the D.C. people weighing in, you would be pushing toward a government that exists to elect and serve itself rather than the nation. (See my earlier blog note about how, in these days of economic crisis, Washington is unique in its low unemployment rate. Being the government city is not without advantages — and the money that keeps Washington rolling along comes out of the pockets of the rest of us.)

There is always some legislation under consideration that would give D.C. political clout. Proponents make principled arguments for why we must do this for the sake of disenfranchised citizens and taxpayers. But, as is usually the case, the underlying motivations are base and self-serving. D.C. would be a Democrat stronghold, so the Democrats want it to vote, while Republicans want to maintain the status quo. The reason the Democrats haven’t pulled off this coup is because of that pesky Constitution, which they haven’t yet managed to completely neutralize.

I mention this because, with the growth of geographically distributed mega-government, more and more of our people are slipping into the compromised framework. The SEIU and the teachers’ unions are prime examples of organizations that feed at the public trough while at the same time wielding a huge amount of political power through their voting numbers and the vast funds they recycle back into the political system. The government’s power to elect itself has become a huge factor in tilting the political playing field away from Main Street, and making America less and less a government of the people.

We came to this point because government has metastasized into a Frankenstein monster (forgive the mixed metaphors!) that would be ruled illegal if anyone actually respected the Constitution. Inch by inch, step by step, government has burst through the Constitutional redlines and come crashing into our lives and our industries…always for enlightened reasons, of course, and continually setting new precedents for incursions which, having been allowed once, must again and again be allowed in the future.

Can the people take America back from government gone wild? You see why this is an uphill battle. The people that work for a living have heretofore found themselves outmaneuvered by the ones that vote for a living. You’ve all been too busy dragging your carcasses to work to counter the antics of our civil servants. You’ve paid your tributes to Caesar and you’ve shrugged off Caesar’s jabs and insults and carried on with your life. This has gone on for so long that both you and Caesar have come to regard this state of affairs as the natural order of things. And that would be okay, except that the strain of carrying a bloated Caesar and his ever-growing entourage has finally brought you to your knees. The sting of Caesar’s riding crop on your back no longer makes your fear overcome your weariness and frustration. Thus the people awaken to the realization that our precious republic has been lost. They open their eyes and see the helm of the ship of state has been commandeered by criminals and lunatics.

What comes next? I can’t say, but I imagine it won’t be easy. We seem destined to be caught in one of those historic upheavals that will throw us all, both friend and foe, for a loop.

I suppose it’s mundane and anticlimactic of me to mention this detail. But I think there was a reason that the residents of D.C. were shut out of the political process. The government must represent the people and not itself. And, likewise, I would argue that the SEIU and teachers’ unions and all the other entities that comprise Big Gov’t Inc. have no business acting as political advocates. If you’re feeding at the trough, you don’t get to run the farm. It’s that simple. And if we find ourselves rebuilding and reconstructing a new government somewhere down the line because this one has ground to a halt, this is a principle to keep in mind.

This section is for comments from tammybruce.com's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Tammy agrees with or endorses any particular comment just because she lets it stand.
2 Comments | Leave a comment
  1. Pangborn says:

    Maynard,
    Your post is thought provoking as always. In response, I humbly posit that the problem we now face is that the Self in this modern age, a Self characterized by an insatiable, bottomless pit of need, exists solely to feed its Self and no other. The noble, shining world once envisioned by our Founding Fathers— one in which sacred individuals are forever “endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights”—has not yet come to be. Despite the inescapable knowledge that each one of us is hopelessly, irrevocably entangled in this multi-colored skein of Humanity, tethered temporarily as we are to this life by a single tenuous thread, they knew this need not be strangling but binding, uniting us as one, albeit fractious, American family. The natural balance they imagined between competing Self interests and the Common Weal has been supplanted by utterly disconnected, ravening Selves seeking only to gorge while others remain famished and malnourished. There is no honor or moral rectitude in coercion so, until we return by choice and not government fiat to a world in which we willfully, joyfully lift one another up, only then will we truly elevate our Selves to the heights our Founding Fathers and our Creator envisioned for each and every one of us.

  2. MRFIXIT says:

    “The United States shall coin money from gold and silver, and regulate the value thereof.” The United States shall not issue certificates of indebtedness. That’s from the constitution, maybe not exactly quoted. Yet, the private bank, the “Federal Reserve” issues “federal reserve notes” that are certificates of indebtdness (an un-backed promise to pay something at sometime) which are printed and issued by the U.S. Treasury, at taxpayer expense for the private bank.

    What constitution? It’s already as dead as it can be. The socialists revere it when it remotely supports their arguement and ignore it when it becomes inconvienient.

    Big government believes it has achieved critical mass. Maybe it has. Even the sh*t for brains republicans are talking about “fixing” the healthcare bill, rather than scrapping it. So while they were bellering about it being unconstitutional, they appearantly are O.K. with amending it?

    I say that we are on the wrong course completely, and we are on the wrong track politically as well. We need to repeal the 14th amendment, and re-assert states rights, while defining federal law supremacy as only that which regulates corporate commerce between states, and not individual activity, financial or otherwise. Then it’s time to repeal the the 16th amendment, and allow taxes to be layed and collected on any activity, but only if all taxes are equally apportioned. No more Marxist progressive taxes. That would cut right down to the issues, and hobble the federal monster.

You must be logged in to post a comment.