fraud

The following story is true.

Really, you just can’t make up stuff like this:

Via The Wall Street Journal: The ‘Spy” Who Fooled the EPA

The Environmental Protection Agency wants to be the nation’s super-regulator, though it might first try to regulate its own employees. At least the ones pretending to be James Bond.

The Department of Justice in late September announced a plea agreement with John C. Beale, until recently a senior career employee at EPA’s Office of Air and Radiation. Beale, 64, has admitted to devoting most of his 23-year career to bilking taxpayers of some $900,000 in pay and expenses….

In 1989, John Beale applied for a job at the EPA, and wrote on his job application that he had worked for the Senate. Apparently, no one bothered to check his application. By 1994, he began claiming that he was a CIA operative. At first, he took off one day at a time, but he was soon gone from his desk job for longer periods, sometimes up to six months, for “undercover” CIA work, either at the Directorate of Operations in Langley, Md., or fighting the Taliban in Pakistan. (He was either lounging at home, or travelling to L.A. and staying at luxury hotels, which he did five times, at taxpayer expense, for a total of $57,000.)

He also claimed that he had contracted malaria in the jungles of Viet Nam, and got himself a handicapped parking spot in downtown DC, worth $18,000. (He was never in Viet Nam. Oh, and he never had malaria.)

An investigation by Louisiana Sen. David Vitter led to Beale’s recent sentencing of 32 months in prison.

The WSJ concludes:

To recap: The same agency that wants to regulate the nation’s carbon economy failed to vet a new hire, swallowed his spy stories, and paid a salary and bonuses to an employee who didn’t come to work and whom it didn’t notice was missing. EPA Inspector General Arthur Elkins, who is investigating the agency’s employment and supervisory practices, says this fraud was the result of “an absence of even basic internal controls at the EPA.” Mr. Vitter is pushing for a Senate hearing into EPA mismanagement, but Environment and Public Works Chairman Barbara Boxer is resisting. Amid all of the other current demonstrations of government incompetence, perhaps she figures this is simply too embarrassing.

But, the story gets worse.

As reported in the Washington Post: EPA warned of ex-official’s illegal salary, bonuses in 2010, watchdog report says

And now this:

Via NY Post: NY audit finds public employees double-dipping

…it turns out you don’t need a fake CIA cover to pull a John Beale. According to a just-released audit by state Comptroller Thomas DiNapoli, New Yorkers, too, are getting hosed by some public employees.

The audit reviewed 345 workers at six state agencies and public authorities. It discovered that 75 held two public-sector jobs, lied about it on their timesheets and reaped double the pay.

“Dozens of public employees working for more than one public employer have managed to take advantage of lax oversight and take credit for hours they didn’t work,” DiNapoli said. “Our audits found supervisors were lax and often complicit in allowing employees to game the system.”

Like the nurse who claimed to work for both the state mental-health agency and a Bronx public school. Or the MTA track-equipment worker whose work schedule overlapped with his other job at the city Department of Environmental Protection….

Abuses happen in the private sector, too. The difference is that private companies have more incentive to stop it.

The moral of the story? The bigger the government, the bigger the opportunities for cheats.

With all this talk about John Beale, and thinking about all the abuse and fraud perpetrated by the Obama Regime (Benghazi, IRS, NSA, Obamacare etc.), I’m reminded of another Beale.

A fictitious one.

Howard Beale.

The movie “Network” was filmed almost 40 years ago.

A different time. A different set of circumstances.

But his words ring eerily true today:

Related:

Breitbart: U.S. Office of Personnel Management (OPM): $274 Million Paid to Dead Federal Retirees Since 2011

This section is for comments from tammybruce.com's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Tammy agrees with or endorses any particular comment just because she lets it stand.
7 Comments | Leave a comment
  1. 1ntbtn says:

    Excellent Shifra, it would be a great way of starting off our New Year if we all, turned to Washington D.C. at the same time, and shouted ” I’m as mad as hell and I’m not going to take this anymore.” It’s hard to take in the abuse these scum bags are putting us through, at our expense.

  2. Vintageport says:

    What a coincidence…there’s also a fraud in the WH…thanks for the article, Shifra. So reassuring. Hurry 2014.

  3. LJZumpano says:

    ha ha! What is teapary? Just us regular folks opening the window yelling we are mad as hell and we’re not gonna take it any more! But, we actually have taken the next step and put that fury into positive action. Look out 2014 — here we come!

  4. Kitten says:

    Great post, Shifra! Tammy gets us fired up like that 5 days a week. 🙂

    Remember the Leo DiCaprio movie “Catch me if you can”? At least his character was likable. This John Beale guy sounds like a real scumbag.

  5. LucyLadley says:

    POWERFUL! Shifra, Tammy & TAMs I appreciate you all so much!

  6. idaho_karen says:

    But good news; after prison he won’t be on the welfare line; he will be drawing his Federal pension!

    Per the Washington Post:
    “Beale’s bonus was not canceled until Feb. 5, 2013. He was forced to retire in April, when his base salary was $164,000. He will collect his pension.”

  7. Alain41 says:

    Speaking of fraud, newspaper edition, WaPo has a Wonkblog item (I hate the title Wonkblog. It gives the impression that there is some kind of deep analysis by those smarter than you.) that, Economists Agree Raising the Min. Wage Reduces Poverty. Well no it doesn’t and no economists don’t agree that it does. Article is written by a lib who starts off with economists disagree as to whether increasing min. wage adversely affects the economy or not. But (article says based on a new study) economists tend to agree that raising min. wage reduces poverty. There is so much wrong with this article, claim, but I will refrain from dissecting. My main point is; this will be the argument today for raising min. wage ==> Forget the old disagreements on its affect on the economy and let’s just act where we do agree that poverty will be reduced.
    http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/wonkblog/wp/2014/01/04/economists-agree-raising-the-minimum-wage-reduces-poverty/?tid=hpModule_79c38dfc-8691-11e2-9d71-f0feafdd1394&hpid=z15

You must be logged in to post a comment.