If you ever found yourself with a throbbing headache (and indigestion) during a Hillary speech, (and this includes just about all of us), the experts tell us why.
Of course, Libs being Libs, the experts’ analysis is spoiled by their conclusion:
Any criticism of Hillary’s speech is…yep, sexist.
Via American Mirror.
The Atlantic magazine is diving deep into understanding why so many people find Hillary Clinton’s voice “annoying” and “irritating.”
The magazine consulted voice experts, ranging from a professor of speech to a voice coach hired by Washington, D.C.’s female elites.
“She is really, really pushing from the throat,” vocal coach Laura Verdun tells the magazine.
“Voice is about finessing the air, not about brute force.”
Amee Shah, an assistant professor at Cleveland State University, conducted an analysis of Clinton’s voice and found her pitch is not necessarily out of the ordinary.
But she believes many people “perceive” her voice to be louder because she often shouts into the microphone, creating the “mic effect.”
….Verdun says if she were to work with Clinton, she would urge her not to use “loudness” as a means to create emphasis, because when everything is loud, listeners can’t discern the point.
At the end of the day, The Atlantic states any criticism of Clinton’s voice is merely sexist because Bernie Sanders was hoarse and yelling and no one ever criticized his speech.
Follow @HeyTammyBruce
