The “Goldwater Rule” was adopted by the American Psychiatric Association after the 1964 presidential election, when psychiatrists weighed in with their “diagnosis” of the Republican nominee, Barry Goldwater, without having had any contact with him.

During the 1964 campaign, Fact Magazine published “The Unconscious of a Conservative: A Special Issue on the Mind of Barry Goldwater.” They asked 12,300 psychiatrists whether Barry Goldwater was “psychologically fit” to be president. 2,400 psychiatrists responded, and about 1,200 said that Goldwater was “unfit.” Two months later, Lyndon Baines Johnson won re-election by a landslide.

In 1966, Barry Goldwater sued the now-defunct Fact Magazine and was awarded $75,000. (In those day, the sum was quite a “chunk of change.”)

Since the adoption of the Goldwater Rule, in 1973, it has been considered unethical for members of the APA to diagnose prominent political figures without direct contact and without authorization to do so.

Until now.


Via Breitbart.

The two most vocal psychiatrists leading a Donald Trump-inspired charge to change a 44-year-old rule barring those in their profession from diagnosing public figures from afar donate heavily to Democratic Party causes.

Lance Dodes and John Zinner told the Los Angeles Times last week that the special circumstances of the Donald Trump presidency demand a revocation of the American Psychiatric Association’s Goldwater Rule, established as a result of psychiatrists using their professional credentials to attack the credibility of the 1964 Republican Party presidential nominee, that currently prohibits such medical evaluations by remote. The Times identified the pair just as psychiatrists without noting their public record of donating to such groups as and ActBlue, as well as a who’s-who of the Democratic Party….

The pair spoke as professionals rather than partisans to the Los Angeles Times and other outlets. Dodes even insisted to U.S. News and World Report (which did not report his politics), “This has nothing to do with politics.”

Instead, Dodes has characterized his stance as prioritizing broad concerns regarding national security over the narrow concerns of his professional group….

In February, Dodes served as the lead signatory of a letter to the New York Times by 35 mental-health professionals calling for the end of the so-called Goldwater Rule….

This section is for comments from's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Tammy agrees with or endorses any particular comment just because she lets it stand.
4 Comments | Leave a comment
  1. Maynard says:

    They told us Goldwater would get America into a war.

  2. Alain41 says:

    If this comes to pass, should eliminate the Federal Elections Commission. Legacy media will endlessly parade psychiatrists volunteering their long distance opinions attacking the Republican candidate. Any short eval. of Dem. candidate will be effusive. Won’t cost anyone a dime unlike actual advertisements, and will be outside the purview of FEC. In essence, non-stop Daisy ads without being ads.

  3. MACVEL says:

    Tyranny comes in many stripes.

  4. MACVEL says:

    Now we know that the Democrats want a committee of psychs to determine that Trump is unfit, and force Congress to kick him out via the 25th Amendment. Of course, what WE think about all this means nothing to them.

You must be logged in to post a comment.