As usual with President Bush lately, what he says is the case is quite the opposite. Skeletor (aka Homeland Security sec Chertoff) and Commerce Sec Carlos Gutierrez announced what is being touted as a “crackdown” on illegal immigration, but in fact is amnesty and an expansion of the so-called Guest Worker programs already in existence. You didn’t know we have about 18 of them, did you?

I’ve been especially struck with the uniform reporting of this Amnesty/Guest Worker plan as a “crackdown” or “enforcement.” If you simply read the thing, it becomes quite clear that it’s neither. The EM, of course, also wants amnesty and open borders, so they’re more than happy to help perpetuate the Bush lie that his admin is actually doing something about the continuing scourge. The insult here is not only is that not true, he’s doing the opposite.

This is one of my favorite headlines. You have to get 12 paragraphs down to get the real story.

Government goes after identity fakers

Under the new employer regulations — which go into effect in one month — employers who receive so-called “no-match” letters that identify discrepancies in a worker’s tax records will have 90 days to resolve the problem.

The reason could be a clerical error or a name change because of marriage, but such irregularities often suggest the employees may be using a phony Social Security number to qualify for work.

If legal status can’t be confirmed within 90 days, the employee must be fired.

Gee, I wonder if we, after committing the federal crime of falsifying federal documents or another crime of using a stolen identity, would get a letter simply telling us we have 90 days to get our act together? And what is the option for those who have used false documents? Why, get hooked up with the existing Guest Worker program, of course. And rules are being ‘streamlined’ to help make that happen. Yes, this is called “amnesty” attached to a “Guest Worker” program.

Gutierrez also said that to lessen the impact on businesses, the administration would streamline and improve temporary visa programs that allow foreign workers to come to the United States for agricultural and other seasonal jobs.

Yeah. I’m sure. Bully for you.

Here’s a summary of the highlights of the bill, none of which, by the way, has been funded. So essentially it’s meaningless, but they will implement the easing of the rules for the existing GW programs I’m sure. And the other thing we have to keep an eye on, is for the Fed to come back and say, after having this sham around for a few months, that now they’ve implemented “enforcement” let’s get that amnesty bill back on track!

Mark my words, that is their plan. Here, courtesy of the San Jose Mercury News, are the ‘highlights’ of their sham:

—Hold employers liable for employing workers who have been notified of problems with their Social Security information and have not resolved those problems in 90 days. [Amnesty]

—Reduce the number of documents employers can accept to verify a worker’s eligibility. [Meaningless]

—Raise civil fines imposed on employers who knowingly hire illegal immigrants by about 25 percent. [Meaningless. They always argue they don’t know, and the Feds have to pursue this which they won’t.]

—Prevent illegal immigrants who have agreed to leave the country from remaining in the country through legal maneuvers by making them subject to deportation if arrested and fining them $3,000. [Meaningless. And which illegal aliens ‘agree’ to leave? Those already convicted of crimes? And note the wobbly language, ‘subject to’ and ‘if.’ Doesn’t mean either will ever happen.]

—Direct the Labor Department to make changes to the H2A agricultural seasonal worker program so it is easier for farmers to use, provides them workers on time and protects workers’ rights. [Crackdown on illegal immigration? This is the expansion of an existing Guest Worker program]

—Correct processing delays in the H2B program for hiring seasonal workers for the landscaping, hospitality and other industries. [More expansion, to help all those identity thieves and SSN card forgers who need to be assimilated into the system after their amnesty]

—Extend from one year to three the duration of a visa for hiring professional workers from Canada and Mexico to attract more such workers to the U.S. [Guest worker expansion, open border facilitation.]

—Spend more money to speed up background checks on immigrants. [Not more comprehensive background checks, let’s just cut the the stupid, irrelevant one-day thing we do now to an hour or two, opening the borders and working in those illegals who’ve been caught via the ‘crackdown’ on identity theft]

—Require the Social Security administration and Department of Homeland Security to devise a way to prevent undocumented workers from earning credit in the Social Security system for work they’ve done while in the country illegally. [Meaningless. ‘Devise a way’? How long? When? What’s their deadline? Absolutely meaningless pandering]

—Expand lists of organized gangs from other nations whose members are barred from automatic entry to the United States. [Expands lists. Great. That’ll stop illegal aliens. And gang members. More lists. Terrific. And meaningless]

—Continue to work on creating a system that will record the exit of foreigners from the country for air, land and sea ports. [Yea, we found out we don’t have one during the amnesty debate. Genius. But how about this–how about ‘continuing to work on a system that will record THE ENTRY of foreigners INTO” this country??]

—By Jan. 31, 2008, begin phasing in requirements for U.S. citizens traveling to Canada, Mexico or the Caribbean to carry passports to re-enter the country at sea and land ports. [Great. This is the already existing passport requirement that we tried to implement this year and couldn’t because the passport people got too overwhelmed.]

—Homeland Security Department will deliver “state of the border” reports regularly. [Ooh, well, that’ll make all the difference. Not.]

This section is for comments from tammybruce.com's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Tammy agrees with or endorses any particular comment just because she lets it stand.
9 Comments | Leave a comment
  1. pat_s says:

    But Tammy, it’s already working. The brutality of this crackdown is deterring Mexicans from attempting to cross the border. Helicopters, drones, surveillance cameras everywhere. It’s so harsh the illegals who are here are trying to leave. Workplace raids, deportations breaking up families, hostility and discrimination. The American Dream is now a nightmare. And what is the result? Farmers are desperately knocking on doors looking for workers to pick the rotting crops. The American economy is ruined! The stupid, cruel American people incited by talkshow hosts have only themselves to blame.

    Illegal immigration rate drops sharply along U.S.-Mexico border

    Mexican shelters, usually the last stop for northbound migrants, are filling with southbound deportees. Fewer migrants are crossing in the wind-swept deserts along an increasingly fortified border. Far to the north, fields are empty at harvest time as workplace raids become more common.

    Mexicans are increasingly giving up on the American dream and staying home, and the federal crackdown on undocumented workers announced Friday should discourage even potential migrants from taking the risks as the United States purges itself of its illegal population.

  2. sigh…

    There are times when I say “Yay! They are kicking butt up there”, but more often anymore it’s more of a “What the heck are the doing up there?”.

    I say “re-elect President Reagan. He may be dead, but he can still do a better job than most of the people who have had or are running for it!”

  3. Rod says:

    John – – A dead Ronnie would be better than the live Progressive we now have!

    GWB is giving us more “Read My Lips” on the issue of criminal aliens. When I read in the papers at Christmas that 4,500,000 criminal aliens have been deported the last 4 months I will believe GWB. Until then I think it is more progressive lies from the RINO I voted for.

  4. jdb says:

    This government is acting like a recalcitrant kid who has been told to clean up his room. Everytime we check on the progress, we hear excuses and find that trash and dirty clothes have been rearranged or shuffled from one corner to another corner. There is a time when you must punish severly for such disobedience. And, every one of us has experienced the personal suffering of being the agent of harsh or corporal punishment. We do it because we have been left no recourse. Is it time to punish severly or do we keep checking on the dirty room?

  5. pat_s says:

    May I use this opportunity to bring attention to another disgraceful insult to the men and women in the military? They too are regarded as cheap labor. The difference is that the Bush administration is looking for ways to extend benefits to the illegals while denying a restoration of benefits to our troops.

    In January, James Webb introduced S. 22, Post-9/11 Veterans Educational Assistance Act of 2007, to restore full benefits of the Montgomery GI bill. The proposed bill would pay for tuition, fees, room and board and a monthly stipend of $1,000 for 36 months. The current Montgomery GI Bill does not factor in education inflation, and veterans are finding themselves having to take out huge loans to fund their education. In 1997 GI Bill benefits paid 48% of education costs on average; in October, 2006, 28.7%. I belive Jim Webb is sincere about this bill. I’m not so sure about the motivations of other Democrats. The hypocrisy of flag-waving Republicans is sickening.

    On 7/31 administration officials testified at the U.S. Senate Committee on Veterans Affairs. The administration opposes this bill claiming it would be too costly and too complicated. In addition, giving better educational benefits to GI’s might hurt reenlistment. Where was the cost analysis of amnesty? Where was the concern that the lure of benefits would be counterproductive in securing our borders? I excerpted some comments made by Keith Wilson, Director, Education Service Veterans Benefits Administration U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs. Such whining would never come from this administration over giving benefits to illegals.

    From Keith Wilson’s testimony, S. 22 (As proposed to be revised)


    We have serious concerns about certain provisions … and, therefore, must oppose it. The complexity of the proposed eligibility requirements, the anticipated high benefit cost (with no apparent offsets), and the anticipated excessive administrative burden associated with this bill are all problematic.

    …administration of this program [will be]cumbersome.

    This labor-intensive process would need to be completed annually … Further, as written, this bill would be effective on the date of enactment. It would be necessary to prescribe regulations, make systems changes, and make other key adjustments to support the components of this bill.

    It also appears that, if enacted, the bill might have some unintended consequences.

    Also see
    Marine Corps Times, Senators warned away from bigger GI Bill
    Navy Times, Administration Opposes Broad GI Bill changes.

  6. Rod says:

    Pat – – It almost sound like you are saying that the progressive RINO I voted for is adding another lie to his lengthy list of lies when he says “We support the troops!” You are verging on treason lad.

    Full disclosure – – I support Jimmy. Jimmy and I are both former Fifth Marines who served in Nam. I was there for the tourist season (1967 – 1968) and got in on the good times a Hue in 68. Jimmy came over a few years after I was back in the “World”. But he has 3 rows of ribbons on his uni to my 2 so I know he got in on a lot of the fun and acquitted himself quite well. I am proud of him! I again am not an unbiased reporter here. I am a very biased reporter; and proud of it!

  7. mythusmage says:

    Tammy, that bill is already impacting employees. U. S. citizens at that. Who just happen to be transexuals. Read Zoe Brain’s post, “Going backwards” for details.

    In short, people who have good reason to fear for their lives face the danger of being outed. Then you have states (Tenesse for example) where it’s effectively illegal for transexuals to amend their records. It’s either correct their records and face criminal charges by their state, or not, and lose their jobs because of the Feds.

  8. ussjimmycarter says:

    There is a very interesting post on Hot Air about shennanigans going on at Immigration. It seems that officials are taking bribes from Islamics! But as we know, Chertoff doesn’t have the tools to do his job…

You must be logged in to post a comment.