hillary-cotton

Someone needs to explain an important “Twitter Rule” to Hillary:

Never start a Twitter fight that you cannot win.

Via Breitbart: Tom Cotton Dings Hillary Clinton on Twitter Over GOP Letter to Iran

….Cotton had responded late Wednesday morning to Secretary of State John Kerry’s statement, “We are not negotiating a legally binding plan” with Iran, by tweeting:

And a follow-up:

So, Hillary jumped right into the fray, with this:

Cotton’s reply:

So, far, nothing further from Hillary.

Maybe next week, her team can come up with a clever response. 🙂

This section is for comments from tammybruce.com's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Tammy agrees with or endorses any particular comment just because she lets it stand.
8 Comments | Leave a comment
  1. WalkStar says:

    Hillary can tweet back, “What difference, at this point, does it make?!” #pantsuitpolitics

  2. WalkStar says:

    Where can you find a browsing category called “Liberal Idiocy?” Only at tammybruce.com! I love us!

  3. Alain41 says:

    One answer to, Ready for Hillary – Yes,Tom Cotton is!

  4. Rob_W says:

    Thanks, Shifra

    Hillary will run and hide now. She’s nothing more than a spoiled brat bully used to getting her way without any push back. It’s a new day, and thankfully we now have Republicans that will not just lie down and take it.

  5. barjo4 says:

    I am not concerned about Cotton, but I am not so sure about the possible GOP nominee in 2016. We need someone who will not pull any punches and I don’t believe Jeb Bush is that kind of candidate.

  6. Maynard says:

    A Tammy tweet cited Donna Brazile, who apparently said something about the 47 Senators violating the Logan Act. This is another of the senseless Democrat talking points. Taranto offered this comment:

    Another claim is that the senators have committed a crime—specifically, that they have violated the Logan Act of 1798, which provides:

    Any citizen of the United States, wherever he may be, who, without authority of the United States, directly or indirectly commences or carries on any correspondence or intercourse with any foreign government or any officer or agent thereof, with intent to influence the measures or conduct of any foreign government or of any officer or agent thereof, in relation to any disputes or controversies with the United States, or to defeat the measures of the United States, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both.

    Even the liberal New Republic scoffs at this. Lawyer Cristian Farias notes that the Logan Act hasn’t been enforced since 1803 and that it “likely violates the First Amendment”—especially in this case, in which the “correspondence or intercourse” is an open letter.

  7. Dave says:

    We need 99 more Senators just like Tom Cotton.

  8. Maynard says:

    I’m hearing rumors that the deleted “personal” correspondence includes some pretty steamy dialogue with an associate identified only by his pen name of “Carlos Danger”. Does anyone have any idea who this might be??

You must be logged in to post a comment.